Literature DB >> 21311293

Large between-center differences in outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in the international mission on prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury (IMPACT) study.

Hester F Lingsma1, Bob Roozenbeek, Bayoue Li, Juan Lu, James Weir, Isabella Butcher, Anthony Marmarou, Gordon D Murray, Andrew I R Maas, Ewout W Steyerberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differences between centers in patient outcome after traumatic brain injury are of importance for multicenter studies and have seldom been studied.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the differences in centers enrolling patients in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and surveys.
METHODS: We analyzed individual patient data from 9578 patients with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury enrolled in 10 RCTs and 3 observational studies. We used random-effects logistic regression models to estimate the between-center differences in unfavorable outcome (dead, vegetative state, or severe disability measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale) at 6 months adjusted for differences in patient characteristics. We calculated the difference in odds of unfavorable outcome between the centers at the higher end vs those at the lower end of the outcome distribution. We analyzed the total database, Europe and the United States separately, and 4 larger RCTs.
RESULTS: The 9578 patients were enrolled at 265 centers, and 4629 (48%) had an unfavorable outcome. After adjustment for patient characteristics, there was a 3.3-fold difference in the odds of unfavorable outcome between the centers at the lower end of the outcome distribution (2.5th percentile) vs those at the higher end of the outcome distribution (97.5th percentile; P<.001). In the 4 larger RCTs, the differences between centers were similar. However, differences were smaller between centers in the United States (2.4-fold) than between centers in Europe (3.8-fold).
CONCLUSION: Outcome after traumatic brain injury differs substantially between centers, particularly in Europe. Further research is needed to study explanations for these differences to suggest where quality of care might be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21311293     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209333b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  36 in total

1.  Bringing attention into higher focus within the traumatic brain injury research agenda.

Authors:  Christopher M Horvat; Michael J Bell
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-10

2.  Research priorities in neurocritical care.

Authors:  R G Geocadin; T P Bleck; W J Koroshetz; C S Robertson; O O Zaidat; P D LeRoux; C A C Wijman; J I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development of prognostic scores based on the IMPACT and the APACHE II.

Authors:  Rahul Raj; Jari Siironen; Riku Kivisaari; Juha Hernesniemi; Markus B Skrifvars
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 4.  Alternative clinical trial design in neurocritical care.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis; Andrew I R Maas; Michael J Souter; Renee H Martin; Randal M Chesnut; Stacia M DeSantis; Gene Sung; Peter D Leroux; Jose I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  The Outcome of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Latin America.

Authors:  Robert H Bonow; Jason Barber; Nancy R Temkin; Walter Videtta; Carlos Rondina; Gustavo Petroni; Silvia Lujan; Victor Alanis; Gustavo La Fuente; Arturo Lavadenz; Roberto Merida; Manuel Jibaja; Luis Gonzáles; Antonio Falcao; Ricardo Romero; Sureyya Dikmen; James Pridgeon; Randall M Chesnut
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Structure, Process, and Culture Differences of Pediatric Trauma Centers Participating in an International Comparative Effectiveness Study of Children with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Gitte Y Larsen; Michelle Schober; Anthony Fabio; Stephen R Wisniewski; Mary Jo C Grant; Nadeem Shafi; Tellen D Bennett; Deborah Hirtz; Michael J Bell
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Initiating Nutritional Support Before 72 Hours Is Associated With Favorable Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Hypothermia.

Authors:  Elizabeth Meinert; Michael J Bell; Sandra Buttram; Patrick M Kochanek; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Stephen R Wisniewski; P David Adelson
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.624

8.  Biomarkers improve clinical outcome predictors of mortality following non-penetrating severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Claudia S Robertson; Kevin K W Wang; Gretchen M Brophy; H Julia Hannay; Shelley Heaton; Ilona Schmalfuss; Andrea Gabrielli; Ronald L Hayes; Steven A Robicsek
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Aziz S Alali; Robert A Fowler; Todd G Mainprize; Damon C Scales; Alexander Kiss; Charles de Mestral; Joel G Ray; Avery B Nathens
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 10.  Severe traumatic brain injury in children: a vision for the future.

Authors:  Michael J Bell; Stephen R Wisniewski
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.