| Literature DB >> 21311213 |
Sabry M Attia1, Saleh A Al-Bakheet, Nouf M Al-Rasheed.
Abstract
This study has been initiated to determine whether proanthocyanidins can protect against doxorubicin-induced mutagenicity in mice and to elucidate the potential mechanism of this protection. Pretreatment of mice with proanthocyanidins (100 mg/kg/day, orally) for 7 days and simultaneously with doxorubicin (12 mg/kg, i.p.) for another day, significantly reduced the frequency of bone marrow DNA strand breaks and micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes compared to doxorubicin-treated mice alone. Furthermore, proanthocyanidins caused a reduction in bone marrow suppression induced by doxorubicin treatment. In male germline, orally administration of proanthocyanidins (100 mg/kg/day, orally) for 7 consecutive days before and 7 consecutive days after treatment with doxorubicin (12 mg/kg, i.p.), significantly elevated the levels of sperm count and motility reduced by doxorubicin treatment. Furthermore, proanthocyanidins significantly decreased the elevated levels of spermatogonial and spermatocyte chromosomal aberrations and sperm head abnormality induced by doxorubicin. Prior administration of proanthocyanidins ahead of doxorubicin reduced the doxorubicin induced testicular lipid peroxidation and prevented the reduction in testicular non-protein sulfhydryl significantly. Conclusively, this study provides for the first time that proanthocyanidins have a protective role in the abatement of doxorubicin-induced mutagenesis and cell proliferation changes in germinal cells of mice that reside, at least in part, in their radical scavenger activity. Therefore, proanthocyanidins can be a promising chemopreventive agent to avert secondary malignancy and abnormal reproductive outcomes risks in cancer patients receiving doxorubicin-involved treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21311213 PMCID: PMC3154042 DOI: 10.4161/oxim.3.6.14418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Level of DNA damaged (A) tail moment, (B) tail DNA, (C) tail length and (D) olive moment induced by proanthocyanidins (Pas) and/or doxorubicin (DOX) or cyclophosphamide (CP) (mean ± SD). ∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗p < 0.01 versus control (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test); #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 versus control; ap < 0.01 and bp < 0.01 versus doxorubicin alone (Mann-Whitney U test).
Frequency of MNpCe and mitotic activity (% pCe) in bone mar- row of mice treated with proanthocyanidins (pas) and/or doxorubicin (DOX) or cyclophosphamide (Cp) (mean ± sD).
| Treatment groups | %MNPCE (mean ± SD) | %PCE (mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.30 ± 0.10 | 48.6 ± 2.6 |
| pas | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 48.2 ± 2.1 |
| DOX | 2.14 ± 0.22** | 35.0 ± 3.3** |
| pas + DOX | 0.86 ± 0.24b | 40.6 ± 4.2 |
| Cp | 1.48 ± 0.35# | 42.2 ± 3.4# |
∗∗p < 0.01 versus control (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test); #p < 0.01 versus control; bp < 0.01 versus doxorubicin alone (Mann-Whitney U test).
Frequency of spermatogonial chromosomal aberrations induced by proanthocyanidins (pas) and/or doxorubicin (DOX) or cyclophosphamide (Cp) (mean ± sD).
| Treatment groups | Average % of aberrant spermatogonial metaphases | Types and number of chromosomal aberrations | Total aberrations(excluding gaps) | Average aber- rations/100 spermatogonial metaphases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromatid type | Chromosome type | F/M | ||||||
| G | B | G | B | |||||
| Control | 4.80 ± 1.09 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 3.20 ± 1.09 |
| Pas | 3.60 ± 1.60 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 2.49 ± 0.84 |
| DOX | 11.2 ± 3.60 | 24 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 18 | 40 | 18.0 ± 3.93* |
| pas + DOX | 6.40 ± 1.60 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 19 | 8.35 ± 2.31b |
| Cp | 42.0 ± 7.07 | 48 | 47 | 6 | 7 | 28 | 82 | 38.4 ± 7.77# |
Fifty metaphases were scored for chromosomal aberrations per mouse, for a total of 250 metaphases per treatment. ∗p < 0.05 versus control (Kruskal- Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test); #p < 0.01 versus control; bp < 0.01 versus doxorubicin alone (Mann-Whitney U test). G, gaps; B, breaks; F, fragments; M, minutes.
Frequency of spermatocyte chromosomal aberrations induced by proanthocyanidins (pas) and/or doxorubicin (DOX) or cyclophosphamide (Cp) (mean ± sD).
| Treatment groups | Different structural chromosomal aberrations screened | Total structural aberrations (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X-Y univalents | Autosomal univalents | F/B | Polyploidy | MV | ||
| Control | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.80 ± 1.09 |
| Pas | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.20 ± 0.44 |
| DOX | 41 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 13.2 ± 1.4** |
| pas + DOX | 15 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7.20 ± 1.0b |
| Cp | 32 | 25 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 14.0 ± 2.2# |
∗∗p < 0.01 versus control (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test); #p < 0.01 versus control; bp < 0.01 versus doxorubicin alone (Mann-Whitney U test). F, fragments; B, breaks; MV, multivalents having a chain of four chromosomes.
Frequency of spermatozoa count, motility and abnormalities of mice after treatment with proanthocyanidins (pas) and/or doxorubi- cin (DOX) or cyclophosphamide (Cp) (mean ± sD).
| Treatment groups | Sperm count (x106/couda epididymis) | Sperm motility (%) | Sperm abnormalities (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 50.2 ± 6.7 | 78.4 ± 7.4 | 3.2 ± 1.0 |
| Pas | 53.0 ± 7.3 | 81.0 ± 9.4 | 2.3 ± 0.8 |
| DOX | 34.8 ± 3.3* | 55.6 ± 11.8* | 9.1 ± 2.3* |
| pas + DOX | 38.0 ± 5.7 | 64.6 ± 8.5 | 5.0 ± 1.3a |
| Cp | 41.0 ± 3.6# | 47.0 ± 5.8# | 12.4 ± 2.9# |
∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01 versus control (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparisons test); #p < 0.01 versus control; ap < 0.01 versus doxorubicin alone (Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 2Effect of proanthocyanidins (Pas) and/or doxorubicin (DOX) on testicular lipid peroxidation and non-protein sulfhydryl (GSH ) concentrations in mice (mean ± SD). ∗∗p < 0.01 versus control; bp < 0.01 versus doxorubicin alone (One way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test).