Literature DB >> 21311163

Genetic background predicts poor prognosis in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

B Borroni1, M Grassi, S Archetti, A Papetti, R Del Bo, C Bonvicini, G P Comi, M Gennarelli, G Bellelli, M Di Luca, A Padovani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ruling out predictors of survival in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a clinical challenge for defining disease outcomes and monitoring therapeutic interventions. Little is known about determinants of survival in FTLD.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to identify whether genetic determinants are key, not only as risk factors but as predictors of survival in FTLD.
METHODS: Ninety-seven FTLD patients were considered in the present study. A clinical evaluation and a standardized assessment were carried out. Each patient underwent blood sampling for genetic testing, and mutations within the progranulin (PGRN) gene, microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) haplotype, apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype and 4 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) polymorphisms were evaluated. Discrete-time survival models were applied.
RESULTS: Monogenic FTLD due to PGRN mutations [odds ratio (OR) = 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-11.7; p = 0.032], and MAPT *H2 haplotype (OR = 3.23, 95% CI = 1.08-9.69; p = 0.036) were associated with an increased hazard risk of poor outcome. Conversely, APOE genotype, and VEGF polymorphisms were not associated with survival risk in the FTLD sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic background is not only crucial in disease pathogenesis, but it also modulates disease course. Genetic factors influencing prognosis should be taken into account to include homogeneous groups in future clinical trials and to monitor efficacy of future interventions.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21311163     DOI: 10.1159/000322790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurodegener Dis        ISSN: 1660-2854            Impact factor:   2.977


  5 in total

1.  Structural and functional characterization of H2 haplotype MAPT promoter: unique neurospecific domains and a hypoxia-inducible element would enhance rationally targeted tauopathy research for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Bryan Maloney; Debomoy K Lahiri
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Occupational attainment influences survival in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal degeneration.

Authors:  Lauren Massimo; Jarcy Zee; Sharon X Xie; Corey T McMillan; Katya Rascovsky; David J Irwin; Ann Kolanowski; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Prognosis of Patients with Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Who have Focal Versus Diffuse Frontal Atrophy.

Authors:  Jin San Lee; Na Yeon Jung; Young Kyoung Jang; Hee Jin Kim; Sang Won Seo; Juyoun Lee; Yeo Jin Kim; Jae Hong Lee; Byeong C Kim; Kyung Won Park; Soo Jin Yoon; Jee H Jeong; Sang Yun Kim; Seung Hyun Kim; Eun Joo Kim; Key Chung Park; David S Knopman; Duk L Na
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Differences and similarities between familial and sporadic frontotemporal dementia: An Italian single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Alberto Benussi; Ilenia Libri; Enrico Premi; Antonella Alberici; Valentina Cantoni; Yasmine Gadola; Jasmine Rivolta; Marta Pengo; Stefano Gazzina; Vince D Calhoun; Roberto Gasparotti; Henrik Zetterberg; Nicholas J Ashton; Kaj Blennow; Alessandro Padovani; Barbara Borroni
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2022-07-25

5.  Cognitive reserve in granulin-related frontotemporal dementia: from preclinical to clinical stages.

Authors:  Enrico Premi; Stefano Gazzina; Marco Bozzali; Silvana Archetti; Antonella Alberici; Mara Cercignani; Angelo Bianchetti; Roberto Gasparotti; Marinella Turla; Carlo Caltagirone; Alessandro Padovani; Barbara Borroni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.