W Wang1, D Z Xu2, Y F Li1, Y X Guan1, X W Sun1, Y B Chen1, R Kesari1, C Y Huang1, W Li1, Y Q Zhan1, Z W Zhou1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou; Department of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou; Department of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: zhouzhw@sysucc.org.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR), established a hypothetical tumor-ratio-metastasis (TRM) staging system and compared it with the 7th edition International Union Against Cancer pathological N (pN) and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1343 gastric cancer patients undergoing D2 resection were staged using the TRM staging system and the 7th edition TNM system. Optimal cut points of LNR were calculated using X-tile software and validated by bootstrapping. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients of the TRM and TNM systems were compared using linear trend χ(2), likelihood ratio χ(2) statistics, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations. RESULTS: Optimal cut points classified patients into LNR0 (0%), LNR1 (1%-30%), LNR2 (31%-60%), and LNR3 (61%-100%) groups. In univariate, multivariate and stratified analyses, the LNR staging showed superiority to the 7th edition pN staging. The TRM staging system had higher linear trend and likelihood ratio χ(2) scores and smaller AIC values compared with those for the TNM system, which represented the optimum prognostic stratification. CONCLUSIONS: The novel TRM staging system predicts survival of gastric cancer more accurately than the 7th edition TNM system. It may be considered as an alternative to TNM system.
BACKGROUND: In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR), established a hypothetical tumor-ratio-metastasis (TRM) staging system and compared it with the 7th edition International Union Against Cancer pathological N (pN) and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1343 gastric cancerpatients undergoing D2 resection were staged using the TRM staging system and the 7th edition TNM system. Optimal cut points of LNR were calculated using X-tile software and validated by bootstrapping. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients of the TRM and TNM systems were compared using linear trend χ(2), likelihood ratio χ(2) statistics, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations. RESULTS: Optimal cut points classified patients into LNR0 (0%), LNR1 (1%-30%), LNR2 (31%-60%), and LNR3 (61%-100%) groups. In univariate, multivariate and stratified analyses, the LNR staging showed superiority to the 7th edition pN staging. The TRM staging system had higher linear trend and likelihood ratio χ(2) scores and smaller AIC values compared with those for the TNM system, which represented the optimum prognostic stratification. CONCLUSIONS: The novel TRM staging system predicts survival of gastric cancer more accurately than the 7th edition TNM system. It may be considered as an alternative to TNM system.
Authors: Shahid G Farid; Gavin A Falk; Daniel Joyce; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh; Andrew M Smith; Gareth Morris-Stiff Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 3.647