PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and prevalence of different glaucoma types among Asian Americans and other races, and evaluate the hazard for glaucoma among different races and Asian ethnicities. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A group of 2,259,061 eye care recipients, aged ≥ 40, who were enrolled in a US managed-care network in 2001-2007. METHODS: Incidence and prevalence rates of open-angle glaucoma (OAG), narrow-angle glaucoma (NAG), and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) were calculated and stratified by race and Asian ethnicity. Cox regression was performed to assess the hazard of developing OAG, NAG, and NTG for Asian Americans and other races, and among different Asian ethnicities, with adjustment for potentially confounding variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariable adjusted hazard of OAG, NAG, and NTG among different races and Asian ethnicities. RESULTS: The OAG prevalence rate for Asian Americans, 6.52%, was similar to that of Latinos (6.40%) and higher than that of non-Hispanic whites (5.59%). The NAG and NTG prevalence rates were considerably higher among Asian Americans (3.01% and 0.73%, respectively) relative to other races. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, Asian Americans had a 51% increased hazard of OAG (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-1.60]), a 123% increased hazard of NAG (adjusted HR, 2.23; CI, 2.07-2.41), and a 159% increased hazard of NTG (adjusted HR, 2.59; CI, 2.22-3.02) compared with non-Hispanic whites. Vietnamese Americans (adjusted HR, 3.78; CI, 3.19-4.48), Pakistani Americans (adjusted HR, 2.45, CI 1.50-4.01), and Chinese Americans (adjusted HR, 2.31, CI 2.06-2.59) had considerably higher hazards of NAG, whereas Japanese Americans (adjusted HR, 4.37, CI 3.24-5.89) had a substantially higher hazard of NTG, compared with non-Asian Americans. CONCLUSIONS: Given the rapid rise in the number of Asian Americans in the US population, resources should be devoted to identifying and treating glaucoma in these patients. Eye-care providers should be aware of the increased risk for OAG, NAG, and NTG among Asian Americans relative to other races. Knowing Asian-American patients' ancestral country of origin may permit more precise estimation of their risks for OAG, NAG, and NTG. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and prevalence of different glaucoma types among Asian Americans and other races, and evaluate the hazard for glaucoma among different races and Asian ethnicities. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A group of 2,259,061 eye care recipients, aged ≥ 40, who were enrolled in a US managed-care network in 2001-2007. METHODS: Incidence and prevalence rates of open-angle glaucoma (OAG), narrow-angle glaucoma (NAG), and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) were calculated and stratified by race and Asian ethnicity. Cox regression was performed to assess the hazard of developing OAG, NAG, and NTG for Asian Americans and other races, and among different Asian ethnicities, with adjustment for potentially confounding variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariable adjusted hazard of OAG, NAG, and NTG among different races and Asian ethnicities. RESULTS: The OAG prevalence rate for Asian Americans, 6.52%, was similar to that of Latinos (6.40%) and higher than that of non-Hispanic whites (5.59%). The NAG and NTG prevalence rates were considerably higher among Asian Americans (3.01% and 0.73%, respectively) relative to other races. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, Asian Americans had a 51% increased hazard of OAG (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-1.60]), a 123% increased hazard of NAG (adjusted HR, 2.23; CI, 2.07-2.41), and a 159% increased hazard of NTG (adjusted HR, 2.59; CI, 2.22-3.02) compared with non-Hispanic whites. Vietnamese Americans (adjusted HR, 3.78; CI, 3.19-4.48), Pakistani Americans (adjusted HR, 2.45, CI 1.50-4.01), and Chinese Americans (adjusted HR, 2.31, CI 2.06-2.59) had considerably higher hazards of NAG, whereas Japanese Americans (adjusted HR, 4.37, CI 3.24-5.89) had a substantially higher hazard of NTG, compared with non-Asian Americans. CONCLUSIONS: Given the rapid rise in the number of Asian Americans in the US population, resources should be devoted to identifying and treating glaucoma in these patients. Eye-care providers should be aware of the increased risk for OAG, NAG, and NTG among Asian Americans relative to other races. Knowing Asian-American patients' ancestral country of origin may permit more precise estimation of their risks for OAG, NAG, and NTG. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Authors: Mingguang He; Paul J Foster; Jian Ge; Wenyong Huang; Yingfeng Zheng; David S Friedman; Pak Sang Lee; Peng T Khaw Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alicja R Rudnicka; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Christopher G Owen; Derek G Cook; Deborah Ashby Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sunny Y Shen; Tien Y Wong; Paul J Foster; Jing-Liang Loo; Mohamad Rosman; Seng-Chee Loon; Wan Ling Wong; Seang-Mei Saw; Tin Aung Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Lingam Vijaya; Ronnie George; M Baskaran; Hemamalini Arvind; Prema Raju; S Ve Ramesh; Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel; Catherine McCarty Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-07-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Melike Pekmezci; Baotran Vo; Annie K Lim; Dean R Hirabayashi; George H Tanaka; Robert N Weinreb; Shan C Lin Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-02
Authors: R J Casson; H S Newland; J Muecke; S McGovern; L Abraham; W K Shein; D Selva; T Aung Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Lingam Vijaya; Ronnie George; Hemamalini Arvind; M Baskaran; S Ve Ramesh; Prema Raju; Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel; Catherine McCarty Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-09-17 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jessica T DeFrank; J Michael Bowling; Barbara K Rimer; Jennifer M Gierisch; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Joshua D Stein; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Nidhi Talwar; Bin Nan; Julia E Richards; David C Musch Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Maxwell Stem; Nidhi Talwar; David C Musch; Cagri G Besirli; Joshua D Stein Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Pooyan Kazemian; Jonathan E Helm; Mariel S Lavieri; Joshua D Stein; Mark P Van Oyen Journal: Prod Oper Manag Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Shilpa Gulati; Chris A Andrews; Alexandra O Apkarian; David C Musch; Paul P Lee; Joshua D Stein Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Lisa Hark; Michael Waisbourd; Jonathan S Myers; Jeffrey Henderer; John E Crews; Jinan B Saaddine; Jeanne Molineaux; Deiana Johnson; Harjeet Sembhi; Shayla Stratford; Ayman Suleiman; Laura Pizzi; George L Spaeth; L Jay Katz Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 1.648
Authors: Ronald L Fellman; Cynthia Mattox; Kuldev Singh; Brian Flowers; Brian A Francis; Alan L Robin; Michelle R Butler; Manjool M Shah; JoAnn A Giaconi; Arsham Sheybani; Brian J Song; Joshua D Stein Journal: Ophthalmol Glaucoma Date: 2020 Jan - Feb