Literature DB >> 21310275

Development and validation of a computational method for assessment of missense variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Daniel M Jordan1, Adam Kiezun, Samantha M Baxter, Vineeta Agarwala, Robert C Green, Michael F Murray, Trevor Pugh, Matthew S Lebo, Heidi L Rehm, Birgit H Funke, Shamil R Sunyaev.   

Abstract

Assessing the significance of novel genetic variants revealed by DNA sequencing is a major challenge to the integration of genomic techniques with medical practice. Many variants remain difficult to classify by traditional genetic methods. Computational methods have been developed that could contribute to classifying these variants, but they have not been properly validated and are generally not considered mature enough to be used effectively in a clinical setting. We developed a computational method for predicting the effects of missense variants detected in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We used a curated clinical data set of 74 missense variants in six genes associated with HCM to train and validate an automated predictor. The predictor is based on support vector regression and uses phylogenetic and structural features specific to genes involved in HCM. Ten-fold cross validation estimated our predictor's sensitivity at 94% (95% confidence interval: 83%-98%) and specificity at 89% (95% confidence interval: 72%-100%). This corresponds to an odds ratio of 10 for a prediction of pathogenic (95% confidence interval: 4.0-infinity), or an odds ratio of 9.9 for a prediction of benign (95% confidence interval: 4.6-21). Coverage (proportion of variants for which a prediction was made) was 57% (95% confidence interval: 49%-64%). This performance exceeds that of existing methods that are not specifically designed for HCM. The accuracy of this predictor provides support for the clinical use of automated predictions alongside family segregation and population frequency data in the interpretation of new missense variants and suggests future development of similar tools for other diseases.
Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21310275      PMCID: PMC3035712          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  29 in total

1.  Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions.

Authors:  P C Ng; S Henikoff
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Crystallographic findings on the internally uncoupled and near-rigor states of myosin: further insights into the mechanics of the motor.

Authors:  D M Himmel; S Gourinath; L Reshetnikova; Y Shen; A G Szent-Györgyi; C Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Pathogenic or not? And if so, then how? Studying the effects of missense mutations using bioinformatics methods.

Authors:  Janita Thusberg; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 4.  Human allelic variation: perspective from protein function, structure, and evolution.

Authors:  Daniel M Jordan; Vasily E Ramensky; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Narrative review: harnessing molecular genetics for the diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Libin Wang; Jonathan G Seidman; Christine E Seidman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  In silico analysis of missense substitutions using sequence-alignment based methods.

Authors:  Sean V Tavtigian; Marc S Greenblatt; Fabienne Lesueur; Graham B Byrnes
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Do common in silico tools predict the clinical consequences of amino-acid substitutions in the CFTR gene?

Authors:  R Dorfman; T Nalpathamkalam; C Taylor; T Gonska; K Keenan; X W Yuan; M Corey; L-C Tsui; J Zielenski; P Durie
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations.

Authors:  Ivan A Adzhubei; Steffen Schmidt; Leonid Peshkin; Vasily E Ramensky; Anna Gerasimova; Peer Bork; Alexey S Kondrashov; Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Evidence from human myectomy samples that MYBPC3 mutations cause hypertrophic cardiomyopathy through haploinsufficiency.

Authors:  Steven Marston; O'Neal Copeland; Adam Jacques; Karen Livesey; Victor Tsang; William J McKenna; Shapour Jalilzadeh; Sebastian Carballo; Charles Redwood; Hugh Watkins
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results.

Authors:  Sharon E Plon; Diana M Eccles; Douglas Easton; William D Foulkes; Maurizio Genuardi; Marc S Greenblatt; Frans B L Hogervorst; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Amanda B Spurdle; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  35 in total

1.  Consensus: a framework for evaluation of uncertain gene variants in laboratory test reporting.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Perry G Ridge; Andrew R Wilson; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Deleterious nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in human solute carriers: the first comparison of three prediction methods.

Authors:  Da-Cheng Hao; Bing Xiao; Ying Xiang; Xue-Wei Dong; Pei-Gen Xiao
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 3.  Inferring causality and functional significance of human coding DNA variants.

Authors:  Shamil R Sunyaev
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Multiple gene mutations, not the type of mutation, are the modifier of left ventricle hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yubao Zou; Jizheng Wang; Xuan Liu; Yilu Wang; Yi Chen; Kai Sun; Shuo Gao; Channa Zhang; Zhimin Wang; Yin Zhang; Xinxing Feng; Ying Song; Yajie Wu; Hongju Zhang; Lei Jia; Hu Wang; Dong Wang; Chaowu Yan; Minjie Lu; Xianliang Zhou; Lei Song; Rutai Hui
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Management of incidental findings in clinical genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Joel B Krier; Robert C Green
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2013

6.  Utility of gene-specific algorithms for predicting pathogenicity of uncertain gene variants.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Biomedical informatics and machine learning for clinical genomics.

Authors:  James A Diao; Isaac S Kohane; Arjun K Manrai
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Gene-Specific Variant Classifier (DPYD-Varifier) to Identify Deleterious Alleles of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Shikshya Shrestha; Cheng Zhang; Calvin R Jerde; Qian Nie; Hu Li; Steven M Offer; Robert B Diasio
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  New approaches to establish genetic causality.

Authors:  Elizabeth M McNally; Alfred L George
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.677

10.  Using exome data to identify malignant hyperthermia susceptibility mutations.

Authors:  Stephen G Gonsalves; David Ng; Jennifer J Johnston; Jamie K Teer; Peter D Stenson; David N Cooper; James C Mullikin; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.