Literature DB >> 21310171

Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load.

Michi Matsukura1, James R Brockmole, Walter R Boot, John M Henderson.   

Abstract

It has been claimed that gaze control during scene viewing is largely governed by stimulus-driven, bottom-up selection mechanisms. Recent research, however, has strongly suggested that observers' top-down control plays a dominant role in attentional prioritization in scenes. A notable exception to this strong top-down control is oculomotor capture, where visual transients in a scene draw the eyes. One way to test whether oculomotor capture during scene viewing is independent of an observer's top-down goal setting is to reduce observers' cognitive resource availability. In the present study, we examined whether increasing observers' cognitive load influences the frequency and speed of oculomotor capture during scene viewing. In Experiment 1, we tested whether increasing observers' cognitive load modulates the degree of oculomotor capture by a new object suddenly appeared in a scene. Similarly, in Experiment 2, we tested whether increasing observers' cognitive load modulates the degree of oculomotor capture by an object's color change. In both experiments, the degree of oculomotor capture decreased as observers' cognitive resources were reduced. These results suggest that oculomotor capture during scene viewing is dependent on observers' top-down selection mechanisms.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21310171     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Active Listening Delays Attentional Disengagement and Saccadic Eye Movements.

Authors:  Benjamin D Lester; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

2.  A load on my mind: evidence that anhedonic depression is like multi-tasking.

Authors:  Keith Bredemeier; Howard Berenbaum; James R Brockmole; Walter R Boot; Daniel J Simons; Steven B Most
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-12-07

3.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

4.  Salient object changes influence overt attentional prioritization and object-based targeting in natural scenes.

Authors:  Nicola C Anderson; Mieke Donk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual search in virtual 3D space: the relation of multiple targets and distractors.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-02

6.  Dual processes of oculomotor capture by abrupt onset: rapid involuntary capture and sluggish voluntary prioritization.

Authors:  Feng Du; Yue Qi; Xingshan Li; Kan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Blur Detection is Unaffected by Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Lester C Loschky; Ryan V Ringer; Aaron P Johnson; Adam M Larson; Mark Neider; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-03-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.