OBJECTIVE: To study the association between baseline retinal microaneurysm score and progression and regression of diabetic retinopathy, and response to treatment with candesartan in people with diabetes. METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial. The progression analysis included 893 patients with Type 1 diabetes and 526 patients with Type 2 diabetes with retinal microaneurysms only at baseline. For regression, 438 with Type 1 and 216 with Type 2 diabetes qualified. Microaneurysms were scored from yearly retinal photographs according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Retinopathy progression and regression was defined as two or more step change on the ETDRS scale from baseline. Patients were normoalbuminuric, and normotensive with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes or treated hypertensive with Type 2 diabetes. They were randomized to treatment with candesartan 32 mg daily or placebo and followed for 4.6 years. RESULTS: A higher microaneurysm score at baseline predicted an increased risk of retinopathy progression (HR per microaneurysm score 1.08, P < 0.0001 in Type 1 diabetes; HR 1.07, P = 0.0174 in Type 2 diabetes) and reduced the likelihood of regression (HR 0.79, P < 0.0001 in Type 1 diabetes; HR 0.85, P = 0.0009 in Type 2 diabetes), all adjusted for baseline variables and treatment. Candesartan reduced the risk of microaneurysm score progression. CONCLUSIONS: Microaneurysm counts are important prognostic indicators for worsening of retinopathy, thus microaneurysms are not benign. Treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is effective in the early stages and may improve mild diabetic retinopathy. Microaneurysm scores may be useful surrogate endpoints in clinical trials.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To study the association between baseline retinal microaneurysm score and progression and regression of diabetic retinopathy, and response to treatment with candesartan in people with diabetes. METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial. The progression analysis included 893 patients with Type 1 diabetes and 526 patients with Type 2 diabetes with retinal microaneurysms only at baseline. For regression, 438 with Type 1 and 216 with Type 2 diabetes qualified. Microaneurysms were scored from yearly retinal photographs according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Retinopathy progression and regression was defined as two or more step change on the ETDRS scale from baseline. Patients were normoalbuminuric, and normotensive with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes or treated hypertensive with Type 2 diabetes. They were randomized to treatment with candesartan 32 mg daily or placebo and followed for 4.6 years. RESULTS: A higher microaneurysm score at baseline predicted an increased risk of retinopathy progression (HR per microaneurysm score 1.08, P < 0.0001 in Type 1 diabetes; HR 1.07, P = 0.0174 in Type 2 diabetes) and reduced the likelihood of regression (HR 0.79, P < 0.0001 in Type 1 diabetes; HR 0.85, P = 0.0009 in Type 2 diabetes), all adjusted for baseline variables and treatment. Candesartan reduced the risk of microaneurysm score progression. CONCLUSIONS:Microaneurysm counts are important prognostic indicators for worsening of retinopathy, thus microaneurysms are not benign. Treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is effective in the early stages and may improve mild diabetic retinopathy. Microaneurysm scores may be useful surrogate endpoints in clinical trials.
Authors: Diana V Do; Xue Wang; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Michael Marrone; Gina Sleilati; Barbara S Hawkins; Robert N Frank Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-01-31
Authors: Stefan B Ploner; Eric M Moult; WooJhon Choi; Nadia K Waheed; ByungKun Lee; Eduardo A Novais; Emily D Cole; Benjamin Potsaid; Lennart Husvogt; Julia Schottenhamml; Andreas Maier; Philip J Rosenfeld; Jay S Duker; Joachim Hornegger; James G Fujimoto Journal: Retina Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: WooJhon Choi; Nadia K Waheed; Eric M Moult; Mehreen Adhi; ByungKun Lee; Talisa De Carlo; Vijaysekhar Jayaraman; Caroline R Baumal; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto Journal: Retina Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Michael Dubow; Alexander Pinhas; Nishit Shah; Robert F Cooper; Alexander Gan; Ronald C Gentile; Vernon Hendrix; Yusufu N Sulai; Joseph Carroll; Toco Y P Chui; Joseph B Walsh; Rishard Weitz; Alfredo Dubra; Richard B Rosen Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Alexander Pinhas; Alexander Gan; Moataz Razeen; Nishit Shah; Eric Cheang; Chun L Liu; Alfredo Dubra; Richard B Rosen Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2016-01-24 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: M L Rasmussen; R Broe; U Frydkjaer-Olsen; B S Olsen; H B Mortensen; T Peto; J Grauslund Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Douglas A Stram; Xuejuan Jiang; Rohit Varma; Mina Torres; Bruce S Burkemper; Farzana Choudhury; Ronald Klein; W James Gauderman; Roberta McKean-Cowdin Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2017-08-16