Literature DB >> 21309841

Improved quality of Type 2 diabetes care following electronic feedback of treatment status to general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

T L Guldberg1, P Vedsted, J K Kristensen, T Lauritzen.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of an electronic feedback system to general practitioners on quality of Type 2 diabetes care.
METHODS: A cluster randomized, controlled trial with 15 months follow-up. Eighty-six general practices (158 general practitioners) in a Danish county caring for 2458 people 40-70 years old with Type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive or not to receive electronic feedback on quality of care. People with Type 2 diabetes were identified using a validated algorithm. Primary end-points were processes of care according to guidelines on prescriptions redeemed for Type 2 diabetes treatments, measuring of glycated haemoglobin and cholesterol and visits to ophthalmologists. Secondary end-points were changes in level of glycated haemoglobin and serum cholesterol. Data were analysed using generalized linear models accounting for clustering at practice level.
RESULTS: During follow-up, people with Type 2 diabetes in the intervention group more often redeemed recommended prescriptions than people in the control group, respectively, as follows: oral antidiabetic treatment (32.8 vs. 12.0%, P =0.002), insulin treatment (33.8 vs. 12.4%, P < 0.001), lipid-lowering medication (38.3 vs. 18.6%, 0.004) and blood pressure medication (27.6 vs. 16.3%, P = 0.026). There were no differences in mean glycated haemoglobin and serum cholesterol between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic feedback to general practitioners on the quality of Type 2 diabetes care resulted in significantly improved quality regarding processes of care according to guidelines. It was not possible to demonstrate any effect on secondary end-point measures within the follow-up period. Electronic feedback on quality of diabetes care can be effective in improving adherence to treatment according to evidence-based guidelines.
© 2011 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2011 Diabetes UK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21309841     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03178.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  11 in total

1.  Personalized medicine for osteoarthritis: where are we now?

Authors:  Allen Dale Sawitzke
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 2.  Public health interventions on prescription redemptions and secondary medication adherence among type 2 diabetes patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Bayu Begashaw Bekele; Biruk Bogale; Samuel Negash; Melkamsew Tesfaye; Dawit Getachew; Fekede Weldekidan; Tewodros Yosef
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2021-09-02

3.  Variation in prescribing of lipid-lowering medication in primary care is associated with incidence of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in people with screen-detected diabetes: findings from the ADDITION-Denmark trial.

Authors:  R K Simmons; A H Carlsen; S J Griffin; M Charles; J S Christiansen; K Borch-Johnsen; A Sandbaek; T Lauritzen
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 4.  A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory.

Authors:  Timothy Tuti; Jacinta Nzinga; Martin Njoroge; Benjamin Brown; Niels Peek; Mike English; Chris Paton; Sabine N van der Veer
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  How Do Interventions That Exemplify the Joint Principles of the Patient Centered Medical Home Affect Hemoglobin A1C in Patients With Diabetes: A Review.

Authors:  Toyosi O Morgan; Darcie L Everett; Anne L Dunlop
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-31

6.  What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  C Keyworth; J Hart; C J Armitage; M P Tully
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  The danish model for improvement of diabetes care in general practice: impact of automated collection and feedback of patient data.

Authors:  Henrik Schroll; René Depont Christensen; Janus Laust Thomsen; Morten Andersen; Søren Friborg; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2012-07-24

Review 8.  Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.

Authors:  John G Lawrenson; Ella Graham-Rowe; Fabiana Lorencatto; Jennifer Burr; Catey Bunce; Jillian J Francis; Patricia Aluko; Stephen Rice; Luke Vale; Tunde Peto; Justin Presseau; Noah Ivers; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-01-15

9.  Statin use and cardiovascular risk factors in diabetic patients developing a first myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Martin Bødtker Mortensen; Imra Kulenovic; Erling Falk
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Interface design recommendations for computerised clinical audit and feedback: Hybrid usability evidence from a research-led system.

Authors:  Benjamin Brown; Panos Balatsoukas; Richard Williams; Matthew Sperrin; Iain Buchan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.