Keisuke Nagasaki1, Tadashi Asami, Yohei Ogawa, Toru Kikuchi, Makoto Uchiyama. 1. Division of Pediatrics, Department of Homeostatic Regulation and Development, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. nagasaki@med.niigata-u.ac.jp
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) increased during the period 1994-2002 in Japan. The reasons for these recently described increases in the prevalence of CH remain unclear. Moreover, the proportion of patients with different etiologies CH in the more recently diagnosed patients has not been established. In this study, we determined the etiologies of CH that were detected by neonatal screening in Niigata refecture, Japan. METHODS: A total of 100 patients having a diagnosis of CH (41 men and 59 women, aged 5-19 years old) were evaluated. To determine the etiology of CH, the patients underwent a ¹²³I thyroidal radioiodine uptake test, a scintigram, a saliva to plasma radioiodine ratio analysis, a perchlorate discharge test, thyroid ultrasonography, measurements of thyroidal function and thyroglobulin, and a thyrotropin (TSH)-releasing hormone tolerance test. RESULTS: Patients with overt CH (n=34, elevated TSH levels with low free thyroxine levels) made up 34% of the total group, 56% of the patients had subclinical CH (n=56, elevated TSH levels with normal free thyroxinelevels), and 10% had normal thyroid function. These were patients who were considered to have transient hypothyroidism or hyperthyrotropinemia. Thyroid dysgenesis was the diagnosis in 73% of patients with overt CH, and the most of these had ectopic thyroid tissue. In contrast, thyroid dysgenesis was the diagnosis in only 36% of the patients with subclinical CH. CONCLUSIONS: Only 50% of our patients with CH detected by neonatal screening had thyroid dysgenesis. With an increase in the percentage of patients with subclinical hypothyroidism, the prevalence of thyroid dyshormogenesis has increased. Studies of the frequency and etiology of CH should consider overt and subclinical CH separately.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) increased during the period 1994-2002 in Japan. The reasons for these recently described increases in the prevalence of CH remain unclear. Moreover, the proportion of patients with different etiologies CH in the more recently diagnosed patients has not been established. In this study, we determined the etiologies of CH that were detected by neonatal screening in Niigata refecture, Japan. METHODS: A total of 100 patients having a diagnosis of CH (41 men and 59 women, aged 5-19 years old) were evaluated. To determine the etiology of CH, the patients underwent a ¹²³I thyroidal radioiodine uptake test, a scintigram, a saliva to plasma radioiodine ratio analysis, a perchlorate discharge test, thyroid ultrasonography, measurements of thyroidal function and thyroglobulin, and a thyrotropin (TSH)-releasing hormone tolerance test. RESULTS:Patients with overt CH (n=34, elevated TSH levels with low free thyroxine levels) made up 34% of the total group, 56% of the patients had subclinical CH (n=56, elevated TSH levels with normal free thyroxinelevels), and 10% had normal thyroid function. These were patients who were considered to have transient hypothyroidism or hyperthyrotropinemia. Thyroid dysgenesis was the diagnosis in 73% of patients with overt CH, and the most of these had ectopic thyroid tissue. In contrast, thyroid dysgenesis was the diagnosis in only 36% of the patients with subclinical CH. CONCLUSIONS: Only 50% of our patients with CH detected by neonatal screening had thyroid dysgenesis. With an increase in the percentage of patients with subclinical hypothyroidism, the prevalence of thyroid dyshormogenesis has increased. Studies of the frequency and etiology of CH should consider overt and subclinical CH separately.