BACKGROUND: To test potential differences between the actions of anti-diabetic medications, we examined the effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents versus glargine-apidra insulin therapy in T2DM. METHODS:T2DM subjects were randomized to either oral hypoglycaemic agents (pioglitazone, metformin and glipizide, n = 9) or insulin therapy (n = 12) for 6 months. Carotid intimal media thickness, vascular reactivity (flow-mediated vasodilatation; percent change in brachial artery basal diameter post-ischaemia) and sublingual nitrate were measured with ultrasonography. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m(2) ) clamp with [3]-3H-glucose and muscle biopsies were performed. RESULTS:Fasting plasma glucose (~257 to ~124 mg/dL, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~256 to ~142 mg/dL, IT) and HbA(1c) (~10.3 to ~6.4%, OHA and ~10.7 to ~7.1%, IT) improved comparably. Endogenous glucose production (~2.1 to ~1.7 mg/kg/min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~2.3 to ~2.0 mg/kg/min, insulin therapy) and endogenous glucose production suppression by insulin (~0.4 to ~0.3 mg/kg min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~0.5 to ~0.7 mg/kg min, insulin therapy) were different. Total glucose disposal × 100 increased in the oral hypoglycaemic agents group (~5.2 to ~8.1; p = 0.03), but not in insulin therapy (~6.0 to ~5.4 mg/kg/min/µU/mL × 100). OHA reduced CIMT (~0.080 to ~0.068 cm; p < 0.05), whereas insulin therapy did not (~0.075 to ~0.072 cm). After sublingual nitrate, brachial artery basal diameter increased in the OHA group (~8.7 to ~18.2%), but not in insulin therapy (~11.2 to ~15.0%; p < 0.02). Except for plasma adiponectin (~7 to ~15, oral hypoglycaemic agents versus ~6 to ~10, IT), changes in inflammatory markers in the circulation and in muscle (IκBα, super-oxidase dismutase 2, monocyte-chemo-attractant protein 1, p-ERK and JNK) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin therapy treated patients achieved adequate glycemic control and the effects on circulating and muscle inflammatory biomarkers were similar, but only oral hypoglycaemic agents improved insulin sensitivity, vascular function and carotid intimal media thickness. These findings in a small sample suggest that the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents provides additional benefits to patients with T2DM.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To test potential differences between the actions of anti-diabetic medications, we examined the effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents versus glargine-apidra insulin therapy in T2DM. METHODS: T2DM subjects were randomized to either oral hypoglycaemic agents (pioglitazone, metformin and glipizide, n = 9) or insulin therapy (n = 12) for 6 months. Carotid intimal media thickness, vascular reactivity (flow-mediated vasodilatation; percent change in brachial artery basal diameter post-ischaemia) and sublingual nitrate were measured with ultrasonography. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m(2) ) clamp with [3]-3H-glucose and muscle biopsies were performed. RESULTS: Fasting plasma glucose (~257 to ~124 mg/dL, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~256 to ~142 mg/dL, IT) and HbA(1c) (~10.3 to ~6.4%, OHA and ~10.7 to ~7.1%, IT) improved comparably. Endogenous glucose production (~2.1 to ~1.7 mg/kg/min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~2.3 to ~2.0 mg/kg/min, insulin therapy) and endogenous glucose production suppression by insulin (~0.4 to ~0.3 mg/kg min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~0.5 to ~0.7 mg/kg min, insulin therapy) were different. Total glucose disposal × 100 increased in the oral hypoglycaemic agents group (~5.2 to ~8.1; p = 0.03), but not in insulin therapy (~6.0 to ~5.4 mg/kg/min/µU/mL × 100). OHA reduced CIMT (~0.080 to ~0.068 cm; p < 0.05), whereas insulin therapy did not (~0.075 to ~0.072 cm). After sublingual nitrate, brachial artery basal diameter increased in the OHA group (~8.7 to ~18.2%), but not in insulin therapy (~11.2 to ~15.0%; p < 0.02). Except for plasma adiponectin (~7 to ~15, oral hypoglycaemic agents versus ~6 to ~10, IT), changes in inflammatory markers in the circulation and in muscle (IκBα, super-oxidase dismutase 2, monocyte-chemo-attractant protein 1, p-ERK and JNK) were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin therapy treated patients achieved adequate glycemic control and the effects on circulating and muscle inflammatory biomarkers were similar, but only oral hypoglycaemic agents improved insulin sensitivity, vascular function and carotid intimal media thickness. These findings in a small sample suggest that the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents provides additional benefits to patients with T2DM.
Authors: Theodore Mazzone; Peter M Meyer; Steven B Feinstein; Michael H Davidson; George T Kondos; Ralph B D'Agostino; Alfonso Perez; Jean-Claude Provost; Steven M Haffner Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: L J Mandarino; K S Wright; L S Verity; J Nichols; J M Bell; O G Kolterman; H Beck-Nielsen Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1987-09 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Steven E Nissen; Stephen J Nicholls; Kathy Wolski; Richard Nesto; Stuart Kupfer; Alfonso Perez; Horacio Jure; Robert De Larochellière; Cezar S Staniloae; Kreton Mavromatis; Jacqueline Saw; Bo Hu; A Michael Lincoff; E Murat Tuzcu Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Laura Montefusco; Moufida Ben Nasr; Francesca D'Addio; Cristian Loretelli; Antonio Rossi; Ida Pastore; Giuseppe Daniele; Ahmed Abdelsalam; Anna Maestroni; Marco Dell'Acqua; Elio Ippolito; Emma Assi; Vera Usuelli; Andy Joe Seelam; Roberta Maria Fiorina; Enrica Chebat; Paola Morpurgo; Maria Elena Lunati; Andrea Mario Bolla; Giovanna Finzi; Reza Abdi; Joseph V Bonventre; Stefano Rusconi; Agostino Riva; Domenico Corradi; Pierachille Santus; Manuela Nebuloni; Franco Folli; Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti; Massimo Galli; Paolo Fiorina Journal: Nat Metab Date: 2021-05-25
Authors: Eva M Lonn; Jackie Bosch; Rafael Diaz; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Ambady Ramachandran; Nicolae Hâncu; Markolf Hanefeld; Henry Krum; Lars Ryden; Sandra Smith; Matthew J McQueen; Leanne Dyal; Salim Yusuf; Hertzel C Gerstein Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 19.112