Literature DB >> 21308473

Does lateral vertebral translation correspond to Cobb angle and relate in the same way to axial vertebral rotation and rib hump index? A radiographic analysis on idiopathic scoliosis.

T R Easwar1, Jae-Young Hong, Jae Hyuk Yang, Seung Woo Suh, Hitesh N Modi.   

Abstract

The deformity in idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is three dimensional in nature and effective correction involves all three planes. Even though the vertebral translation (VT) is an accepted element in the deformity along with vertebral rotation(VR) as reported by Asher and Cook (Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(12):1386-1391, 1995), Kotwicki et al. (Study Health Technol Inf 123:164-168, 2006) and Kotwicki and Napiontek (Pediatr Orthop 28(2):225-229, 2008), rib hump (rib hump index (RI)) and Cobb angle as reported by Aaro and Dahlborn (Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6(6):567-572, 1981), it was assumed that VT was represented by adequately by Cobb angle and it was not analysed individually. We hypothesized that the Cobb angle and the VT measured in axial plane on CT scan and may not represent the same measurement and factors like coronal plane vertebral tilt,VR and vertebral deformation might affect them in different ways. Hence, VT should be considered as a separate variable and its relationship with VR, RI and Cobb angle should be investigated. Since the newer implants depend on curve translation and derotation for correction studying the role of VT and the relationships is important. VT, VR and RI were measured in CT scans of 75 patients with IS and correlated with Cobb angle. Regression analysis was used to identify the influence of the variables on each other. All the variables significantly correlated with one another but the correlation of Cobb and VT is not perfectly linear and it cannot be used to represent VT. VT influences RI much more than Cobb angle or VR. VT, therefore, merits further study treating it as an independent variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21308473      PMCID: PMC3176709          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1702-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  A comparative study of computed tomographic and plain radiographic methods to measure vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  E K Ho; S S Upadhyay; L Ferris; F L Chan; J Bacon-Shone; L C Hsu; J C Leong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  New methods of measuring vertebral rotation from computed tomographic scans. An intraobserver and interobserver study on girls with scoliosis.

Authors:  E K Ho; S S Upadhyay; F L Chan; L C Hsu; J C Leong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Estimation of vertebral rotation in structural scoliosis by computer tomography.

Authors:  S Aaro; M Dahlborn; L Svensson
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1978

4.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The Double Rib Contour Sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: aetiologic implications for scoliosis.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Spyros Dangas; Basil D Polyzois; Panagiotis Samelis
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

6.  Study of the rib cage deformity in children with 10 degrees-20 degrees of Cobb angle late onset idiopathic scoliosis, using rib-vertebra angles--aetiologic implications.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Panagiotis Samelis; Theodoros Chadziargiropoulos; Basilios Polyzois
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

7.  The longitudinal axis rotation of the apical vertebra, the vertebral, spinal, and rib cage deformity in idiopathic scoliosis studied by computer tomography.

Authors:  S Aaro; M Dahlborn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The transverse plane evolution of the most common adolescent idiopathic scoliosis deformities. A cross-sectional study of 181 patients.

Authors:  M A Asher; L T Cook
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal and rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography.

Authors:  S Aaro; M Dahlborn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Vertebral rotation measurement: a summary and comparison of common radiographic and CT methods.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Lam; Doug L Hill; Lawrence H Le; Jim V Raso; Edmond H Lou
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2008-11-02
View more
  11 in total

1.  Migration of the penetrated rib head following deformity correction surgery without rib head excision in dystrophic scoliosis secondary to type 1 Neurofibromatosis.

Authors:  Saihu Mao; Benlong Shi; Shoufeng Wang; Chengyue Zhu; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Zhen Liu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Predicting preoperative pulmonary function in patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from spinal and thoracic radiographic parameters.

Authors:  James Farrell; Enrique Garrido
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A comprehensive review of thoracic deformity parameters in scoliosis.

Authors:  Jonathan A Harris; Oscar H Mayer; Suken A Shah; Robert M Campbell; Sriram Balasubramanian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Short apical rib resections thoracoplasty compared to conventional thoracoplasty in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Yang; Amit Wasudeo Bhandarkar; Hitesh N Modi; Si Young Park; Jae Min Cha; Jae Young Hong; Seung Woo Suh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Abnormal change of paravertebral muscle in adult degenerative scoliosis and its association with bony structural parameters.

Authors:  Dongxiao Xie; Jinniu Zhang; Wenyuan Ding; Sidong Yang; Dalong Yang; Lei Ma; Jingtao Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review.

Authors:  Fraser R Labrom; Maree T Izatt; Andrew P Claus; J Paige Little
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Magnetically controlled growing rods in the management of early onset scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Wai On Chiu; Raffaele Scrofani; Wai Kwong Chiu; Alice Baroncini; Giorgio Iaconetta; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  Vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis calculated by radiograph and back surface analysis-based methods: correlation between the Raimondi method and rasterstereography.

Authors:  Massimiliano Mangone; Paolo Raimondi; Marco Paoloni; Sabina Pellanera; Alessandra Di Michele; Sara Di Renzo; Mariangela Vanadia; Mauro Dimaggio; Massimiliano Murgia; Valter Santilli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Expressing Cobb Angle as Linear Measurement in Scoliosis and Its Significance: A Clinical and Geometrical Analysis of Scoliosis.

Authors:  Kishore Puthezhath
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-12-31

10.  Association between intra-operative hemodynamic changes and corrective procedures during posterior spinal fusion in adolescent patients with scoliosis: A case-control study.

Authors:  Kanichiro Wada; Gentaro Kumagai; Hitoshi Kudo; Sunao Tanaka; Toru Asari; Yuki Fjita; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.