| Literature DB >> 21307318 |
Irina Kirillova1, Vanessa H Rausch, Jan Tode, Ralf Baron, Wilfrid Jänig.
Abstract
Injury of limb nerves leading to neuropathic pain mostly affects deep somatic nerves including muscle nerves. Here, we investigated the functional properties of injured afferent fibers innervating the lateral gastrocnemius-soleus muscle 4-13 h [time period (TP) I] and 4-7 days (TP II) after nerve crush in anesthetized rats using neurophysiological recordings from either the sciatic nerve (165 A-, 137 C-fibers) or the dorsal root L(5) (43 A-, 28 C-fibers). Ongoing activity and responses to mechanical or thermal stimulation of the injury site of the nerve were studied quantitatively. Of the electrically identified A- and C-fibers, 5 and 38% exhibited ectopic activity, respectively, in TP I and 51 and 61%, respectively, in TP II. Thus all afferent fibers in an injured muscle nerve developed ectopic activity since ∼ 50% of the fibers in a muscle nerve are somatomotor or sympathetic postganglionic. Ongoing activity was present in 50% of the afferent A-fibers (TP II) and in 53-56% of the afferent C-fibers (TP I and II). In TP II, mechanical, cold, and heat sensitivity were present in 91, 63, and 52% of the afferent A-fibers and in 50, 40, and 66% of the afferent C-fibers. The cold and heat activation thresholds were 5-27 and 35-48°C, respectively, covering the noxious and innocuous range. Most afferent fibers showed combinations of these sensitivities. Mechano- and cold sensitivity had a significantly higher representation in A- than in C-fibers, but heat sensitivity had a significantly higher representation in C- than in A-fibers. These functional differences between A- and C-fibers applied to large- as well as small-diameter A-fibers. Comparing the functional properties of injured muscle A- and C-afferents with those of injured cutaneous A- and C-afferents shows that both populations of injured afferent neurons behave differently in several aspects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21307318 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00938.2010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurophysiol ISSN: 0022-3077 Impact factor: 2.714