Literature DB >> 21307144

HER2 protein and gene variation between primary and metastatic breast cancer: significance and impact on patient care.

Alessandra Fabi1, Anna Di Benedetto, Giulio Metro, Letizia Perracchio, Cecilia Nisticò, Franco Di Filippo, Cristiana Ercolani, Gianluigi Ferretti, Elisa Melucci, Simonetta Buglioni, Isabella Sperduti, Paola Papaldo, Francesco Cognetti, Marcella Mottolese.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze HER2 status in primary breast cancer (PBC) compared with correspondent metachronous metastases and to investigate whether BC phenotype may be predictive of change in HER2 expression. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: HER2 was investigated by immunohistochemistry, silver in situ hybridization (SISH), and FISH, in a series of 137 tumors, building up a tissue microarray to concurrently analyze each single PBC and metastatic (MBC) on the same slide.
RESULTS: HER2 status was discordant in 14 cases (10%): 12 negative in PBC and positive in metastases and two positive in PBC and negative in metastases (P = 0.04). These findings were confirmed by a PCR based test termed Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). HER2 status changed in hormone receptor-positive BC more frequently than in negative ones (P = 0.002). In addition, we evaluated HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number by SISH in the 123 cases with unchanged HER2 status during progression. We found consistent HER2 gene copy number stability in the 100 nonamplified cases. Conversely, of the 23 amplified PBC, 13 (57%) demonstrated a significant increase in the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number in their paired metastases (P = 0.01), as defined by SISH (k = 0.54, P < 0.0001) and MLPA. Patients who changed HER2 status from negative to positive, presented significant longer time to progression when treated with trastuzumab compared to those who were untreated (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: When feasible, HER2 reassessment in metastatic lesions should be carefully taken into account, especially for metastases coming from primary hormone receptor-positive BC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21307144     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  37 in total

1.  Metastatic breast cancer, version 1.2012: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.

Authors:  Robert W Carlson; D Craig Allred; Benjamin O Anderson; Harold J Burstein; Stephen B Edge; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Lori J Goldstein; William J Gradishar; Daniel F Hayes; Clifford A Hudis; Steven Jay Isakoff; Britt-Marie E Ljung; David A Mankoff; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Richard L Theriault; John H Ward; Antonio C Wolff; Richard Zellars; Rashmi Kumar; Dorothy A Shead
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Preclinical Evaluation of 18F-Labeled Anti-HER2 Nanobody Conjugates for Imaging HER2 Receptor Expression by Immuno-PET.

Authors:  Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Darryl McDougald; Jaeyeon Choi; Eftychia Koumarianou; Douglas Weitzel; Takuya Osada; H Kim Lyerly; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Characterization of HER2 gene amplification heterogeneity in invasive and in situ breast cancer using bright-field in situ hybridization.

Authors:  António Polónia; Guilherme Oliveira; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer.

Authors:  Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Relationship between Tumor Biomarkers and Efficacy in EMILIA, a Phase III Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Gail D Lewis Phillips; Sunil Verma; Jungsil Ro; Jens Huober; Alice E Guardino; Meghna K Samant; Steve Olsen; Sanne L de Haas; Mark D Pegram
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Therapeutic applications of an expanded genetic code.

Authors:  Sophie B Sun; Peter G Schultz; Chan Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.164

Review 7.  Emergence of ERBB2 Mutation as a Biomarker and an Actionable Target in Solid Cancers.

Authors:  Janakiraman Subramanian; Archana Katta; Ashiq Masood; Dashavantha Reddy Vudem; Rama Krishna Kancha
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-07-10

8.  Biomarkers in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and the PRAEGNANT Study Network.

Authors:  P A Fasching; S Y Brucker; T N Fehm; F Overkamp; W Janni; M Wallwiener; P Hadji; E Belleville; L Häberle; F-A Taran; D Lüftner; M P Lux; J Ettl; V Müller; H Tesch; D Wallwiener; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Cancer Signature Investigation: ERBB2 (HER2)-Activating Mutation and Amplification-Positive Breast Carcinoma Mimicking Lung Primary.

Authors:  Jennifer Shih; Babar Bashir; Karen S Gustafson; Mark Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack; Lori J Goldstein; Yanis Boumber
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.908

10.  Prognostic and predictive value of tumor vascular endothelial growth factor gene amplification in metastatic breast cancer treated with paclitaxel with and without bevacizumab; results from ECOG 2100 trial.

Authors:  Bryan P Schneider; Robert J Gray; Milan Radovich; Fei Shen; Gail Vance; Lang Li; Guanglong Jiang; Kathy D Miller; Julie R Gralow; Maura N Dickler; Melody A Cobleigh; Edith A Perez; Tamara N Shenkier; Kirsten Vang Nielsen; Sven Müller; Ann Thor; George W Sledge; Joseph A Sparano; Nancy E Davidson; Sunil S Badve
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.