PURPOSE: To analyze HER2 status in primary breast cancer (PBC) compared with correspondent metachronous metastases and to investigate whether BC phenotype may be predictive of change in HER2 expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HER2 was investigated by immunohistochemistry, silver in situ hybridization (SISH), and FISH, in a series of 137 tumors, building up a tissue microarray to concurrently analyze each single PBC and metastatic (MBC) on the same slide. RESULTS: HER2 status was discordant in 14 cases (10%): 12 negative in PBC and positive in metastases and two positive in PBC and negative in metastases (P = 0.04). These findings were confirmed by a PCR based test termed Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). HER2 status changed in hormone receptor-positive BC more frequently than in negative ones (P = 0.002). In addition, we evaluated HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number by SISH in the 123 cases with unchanged HER2 status during progression. We found consistent HER2 gene copy number stability in the 100 nonamplified cases. Conversely, of the 23 amplified PBC, 13 (57%) demonstrated a significant increase in the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number in their paired metastases (P = 0.01), as defined by SISH (k = 0.54, P < 0.0001) and MLPA. Patients who changed HER2 status from negative to positive, presented significant longer time to progression when treated with trastuzumab compared to those who were untreated (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: When feasible, HER2 reassessment in metastatic lesions should be carefully taken into account, especially for metastases coming from primary hormone receptor-positive BC.
PURPOSE: To analyze HER2 status in primary breast cancer (PBC) compared with correspondent metachronous metastases and to investigate whether BC phenotype may be predictive of change in HER2 expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:HER2 was investigated by immunohistochemistry, silver in situ hybridization (SISH), and FISH, in a series of 137 tumors, building up a tissue microarray to concurrently analyze each single PBC and metastatic (MBC) on the same slide. RESULTS:HER2 status was discordant in 14 cases (10%): 12 negative in PBC and positive in metastases and two positive in PBC and negative in metastases (P = 0.04). These findings were confirmed by a PCR based test termed Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA). HER2 status changed in hormone receptor-positive BC more frequently than in negative ones (P = 0.002). In addition, we evaluated HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number by SISH in the 123 cases with unchanged HER2 status during progression. We found consistent HER2 gene copy number stability in the 100 nonamplified cases. Conversely, of the 23 amplified PBC, 13 (57%) demonstrated a significant increase in the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 copy number in their paired metastases (P = 0.01), as defined by SISH (k = 0.54, P < 0.0001) and MLPA. Patients who changed HER2 status from negative to positive, presented significant longer time to progression when treated with trastuzumab compared to those who were untreated (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: When feasible, HER2 reassessment in metastatic lesions should be carefully taken into account, especially for metastases coming from primary hormone receptor-positive BC.
Authors: Robert W Carlson; D Craig Allred; Benjamin O Anderson; Harold J Burstein; Stephen B Edge; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Lori J Goldstein; William J Gradishar; Daniel F Hayes; Clifford A Hudis; Steven Jay Isakoff; Britt-Marie E Ljung; David A Mankoff; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Richard L Theriault; John H Ward; Antonio C Wolff; Richard Zellars; Rashmi Kumar; Dorothy A Shead Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Darryl McDougald; Jaeyeon Choi; Eftychia Koumarianou; Douglas Weitzel; Takuya Osada; H Kim Lyerly; Michael R Zalutsky Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: José Baselga; Gail D Lewis Phillips; Sunil Verma; Jungsil Ro; Jens Huober; Alice E Guardino; Meghna K Samant; Steve Olsen; Sanne L de Haas; Mark D Pegram Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: P A Fasching; S Y Brucker; T N Fehm; F Overkamp; W Janni; M Wallwiener; P Hadji; E Belleville; L Häberle; F-A Taran; D Lüftner; M P Lux; J Ettl; V Müller; H Tesch; D Wallwiener; A Schneeweiss Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Jennifer Shih; Babar Bashir; Karen S Gustafson; Mark Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack; Lori J Goldstein; Yanis Boumber Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Bryan P Schneider; Robert J Gray; Milan Radovich; Fei Shen; Gail Vance; Lang Li; Guanglong Jiang; Kathy D Miller; Julie R Gralow; Maura N Dickler; Melody A Cobleigh; Edith A Perez; Tamara N Shenkier; Kirsten Vang Nielsen; Sven Müller; Ann Thor; George W Sledge; Joseph A Sparano; Nancy E Davidson; Sunil S Badve Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 12.531