Literature DB >> 21306916

A comparison of training intensity between whole-body vibration and conventional squat exercise.

Pedro J Marín1, Alejandro Santos-Lozano, Fernanda Santin-Medeiros, Christophe Delecluse, Nuria Garatachea.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate surface electromyographic activity (sEMG) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) during semi-squat exercise on vibration platform compared with semi-squat exercise performed on a Smith machine. Twenty-three recreationally active students (15 males and 8 females) were exposed to six different loads in one of both exercise modes: vibration or Smith machine. The subject performed a squat in six experimental conditions; the load differed per experimental condition. For each subject the exercise mode (n=2) and the different loads per mode (n=6) were assigned in a random order to check the influence of vibration magnitude (acceleration: ms(-2)) as well as weight (kg) on sEMG and RPE. Two-way ANOVA for RPE, lumbar and lower-body sEMG revealed a significant weight main effect (P<0.01) and a significant acceleration main effect (P<0.01). The results from this study demonstrate that the training stimulus resulting from an isometric semi-squat exercise on a vibration platform (acceleration: from 12 to 89 ms(-2)) is similar to the training stimulus of an isometric semi-squat exercise on Smith machine (weight: from 20 to 70 kg) according to lower-body sEMG and RPE. However, the impact of semi-squat on vibration platform exercise for lumbar muscle is relatively small compared with semi-squat on Smith machine. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306916     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  7 in total

1.  Vibration as an adjunct to exercise: its impact on shoulder muscle activation.

Authors:  Michael J Grant; David H Hawkes; Jessica McMahon; Ian Horsley; Omid A Khaiyat
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Strength training with superimposed whole body vibration does not preferentially modulate cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Ashleigh T Weier; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

3.  Analysis of muscle activation in each body segment in response to the stimulation intensity of whole-body vibration.

Authors:  Dae-Yeon Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Activation of back and lower limb muscles during squat exercises with different trunk flexion.

Authors:  Tae-Sik Lee; Min-Young Song; Yu-Jeong Kwon
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27

5.  Managing Vibration Training Safety by Using Knee Flexion Angle and Rating Perceived Exertion.

Authors:  Long-Ren Chuang; Wen-Wen Yang; Po-Ling Chang; Vincent Chiun-Fan Chen; Chiang Liu; Tzyy-Yuang Shiang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  John W D Lea; Jamie M O'Driscoll; Sabina Hulbert; James Scales; Jonathan D Wiles
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-08

7.  Feasibility of whole body vibration during intensive chemotherapy in patients with hematological malignancies - a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Antonia Pahl; Anja Wehrle; Sarah Kneis; Albert Gollhofer; Hartmut Bertz
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.