Literature DB >> 21306336

Measuring and improving quality in obstetrics--the implementation of national indicators in Denmark.

Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel1, Line Riis Jølving.   

Abstract

From September 2010, all births in Denmark will be monitored from a quality perspective with the Danish National Indicator Project in order to document and develop the quality of the care provided during delivery. We describe the process of selecting the indicators based on relevance, scientific evidence, usefulness and applicability, acceptability and patient safety. Eight indicators were selected covering different aspects of delivery: anesthesia/pain relief; continuous support for women in the delivery room; lacerations, 3rd or 4th degree; acute cesarean section; post-partum hemorrhage; establishment of skin-to-skin contact between mother and newborn infant; severe fetal hypoxia; delivery of a healthy child after uncomplicated delivery. Registration will be mandatory for all delivery units in Denmark. Subsequently, the clinical units will receive feedback in the form of real-time monthly and quarterly standard reports including unadjusted results that may be used for the unit's own internal monitoring and development of quality.
© 2011 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica© 2011 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306336     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01078.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  13 in total

1.  Development and Measurement of Guidelines-Based Quality Indicators of Caesarean Section Care in the Netherlands: A RAND-Modified Delphi Procedure and Retrospective Medical Chart Review.

Authors:  Sonja Melman; Ellen C N Schoorel; Karin de Boer; Henriëtte Burggraaf; Jan B Derks; Det van Dijk; Jeroen van Dillen; Carmen D Dirksen; Johannes J Duvekot; Arie Franx; Tom H M Hasaart; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Diny Kolkman; Sander van Kuijk; Anneke Kwee; Ben W Mol; Mariëlle G van Pampus; Alieke de Roon-Immerzeel; Jos J M van Roosmalen; Frans J M E Roumen; Ellen Smid-Koopman; Luc Smits; Wilbert A Spaans; Harry Visser; Wim J van Wijngaarden; Christine Willekes; Maurice G A J Wouters; Jan G Nijhuis; Rosella P M G Hermens; Hubertina C J Scheepers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  The Danish National Quality Database for Births.

Authors:  Charlotte Brix Andersson; Christina Flems; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Risk factors and between-hospital variation of caesarean section in Denmark: a cohort study.

Authors:  Sonja Wehberg; Rikke Guldberg; Kim Oren Gradel; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Lis Munk; Charlotte Brix Andersson; Line Riis Jølving; Jan Nielsen; Bente Mertz Nørgård
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method.

Authors:  Kayo Ueda; Shosuke Ohtera; Misato Kaso; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal.

Authors:  Malini Anand Nijagal; Stephanie Wissig; Caleb Stowell; Elizabeth Olson; Isis Amer-Wahlin; Gouke Bonsel; Allyson Brooks; Matthew Coleman; Shamala Devi Karalasingam; James M N Duffy; Tracy Flanagan; Stefan Gebhardt; Meridith E Greene; Floris Groenendaal; J Ravichandran R Jeganathan; Tessa Kowaliw; Marije Lamain-de-Ruiter; Elliott Main; Michelle Owens; Rod Petersen; Irwin Reiss; Carol Sakala; Anna Maria Speciale; Rachel Thompson; Oluwakemi Okunade; Arie Franx
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the effect of a "birth environment room" versus a standard labour room on birth outcomes and the birth experience.

Authors:  Iben Lorentzen; Charlotte Sander Andersen; Henriette Svenstrup Jensen; Ann Fogsgaard; Maralyn Foureur; Finn Friis Lauszus; Ellen Aagaard Nohr
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-02-15

7.  Monitoring quality of obstetric care from hospital discharge databases: A Delphi survey to propose a new set of indicators based on maternal health outcomes.

Authors:  Priscille Sauvegrain; Anne Alice Chantry; Coralie Chiesa-Dubruille; Hawa Keita; François Goffinet; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Involving patients in quality indicator development - a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Kötter; Friederike Anna Schaefer; Martin Scherer; Eva Blozik
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Quality of obstetric care in the sparsely populated sub-arctic area of Norway 2009-2011.

Authors:  Jan Norum; Anca Heyd; Bente Hjelseth; Tove Svee; Fred A Mürer; Randi Erlandsen; Barthold Vonen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Assessing the quality of record keeping for cesarean deliveries: results from a multicenter retrospective record review in five low-income countries.

Authors:  Evelyn Landry; Celia Pett; Renee Fiorentino; Joseph Ruminjo; Cristina Mattison
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.