Literature DB >> 21306315

Ectopic pregnancy: using the hCG ratio to select women for expectant or medical management.

Emma Kirk1, Ben Van Calster, George Condous, Aris T Papageorghiou, Olivier Gevaert, Sabine Van Huffel, Bart De Moor, Dirk Timmerman, Tom Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables that can be used to select women with an ectopic pregnancy for expectant or medical management with systemic methotrexate.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Early Pregnancy Unit of a London teaching hospital. POPULATION: Women with a tubal ectopic pregnancy managed non-surgically.
METHODS: The diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy was made using transvaginal sonography. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels had to be taken at 0 hour and 48 hours pre-treatment. Other recorded variables include presenting complaints, gestational age, progesterone levels, size of the ectopic mass and appearance of the ectopic on transvaginal sonography. Women were followed up until the outcome (success or failure) of management was known. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Univariable analysis was performed to identify the variables associated with successful management using area under curves and relative risks.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine women underwent expectant management (overall success rate 71.8%) and 42 had medical management (overall success rate 76.2%). The pre-treatment hCG ratio (hCG 48 hours/hCG 0 hour) was related to the failure of both expectant (area under curve 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-0.94) and medical (area under curve 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-0.90) management. History of ectopic pregnancy was related to failure of expectant management only (relative risk 0.46, 95% CI 0.16-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS: The most important variable for predicting the likelihood of successful non-surgical management was the pre-treatment hCG ratio. New studies are required to validate the use of this variable and of history of ectopic pregnancy to predict the likelihood of successful non-surgical management in clinical practice.
© 2011 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica© 2011 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306315     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01053.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

Review 1.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-11-16

Review 3.  Efficacy and safety of expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G E Colombo; M Leonardi; M Armour; H Di Somma; T Dinh; F da Silva Costa; L Wong; S Armour; G Condous
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-10-25

4.  A Clinical Experience of Ectopic Pregnancies with Initial Free Intraperitoneal Fluid.

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Sargin; Murat Yassa; Bilge Dogan Taymur; Ayhan Çelik; Sibel Aydin; Emrah Orhan; Niyazi Tug
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

Review 5.  Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies.

Authors:  Bassem Refaat; Elizabeth Dalton; William L Ledger
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Comparison of Four Methods of Treating Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zeynep Ozturk Inal; Hasan Ali Inal
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.915

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.