Literature DB >> 21306061

Developing a policy for do not resuscitate orders within a framework of goals of care.

Lauris C Kaldjian1, Ann Broderick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discussions about DNR (do not resuscitate) orders or code status are common but can be difficult and may not lead to accurate understanding between clinicians and patients. These discussion are often isolated from the larger context of a patient's plan of care. Addressing patients goals of care, which provide a basic orientation for clinical and ethical decision making, may improve clinicians' understanding about patients' code-status preferences. A POLICY FOR DNR ORDERS WITHIN A FRAMEWORK OF GOALS OF CARE: On the basis of experience at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, which entailed incorporating goals of care in ethics education, identifying six goals of care through a structured literature review, surveying hospitalized adults, and integrating goals of care into palliative care education, the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics ethics committee revised the hospital policy regarding DNR orders. The intention was to avoid treating DNR orders as an isolated clinical phenomenon and to instead place the discussion of DNR orders in the more general context of end-of-life discussions and to place both of these discussions within an even more general framework of goals of care.
CONCLUSIONS: The DNR order policy represents an effort to translate conceptual analysis, empirical research, and clinical experience into hospital policy so that clinicians are encouraged to place code-status discussions within a larger, goal-oriented context. Using goals of care to guide decision making about DNR orders and other treatments should enhance the quality of patient care by improving the fit between the biomedical information we provide patients and the values our patients rely on to make their medical decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306061     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37002-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  8 in total

1.  Seriously ill hospitalized patients' perspectives on the benefits and harms of two models of hospital CPR discussions.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Jenica W Cimino; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

2.  The value of history and goals of care with code status; even in an emergency setting.

Authors:  Affan Irfan; Siddharth Hublikar; Jae Hyung Cho; John Hill
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-25

3.  Should a reversible, but lethal, incident not be treated when a patient has a do-not-resuscitate order?

Authors:  Philip C Hébert; Debbie Selby
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Levels of Intervention: How Are They Used in Quebec Hospitals?

Authors:  Marjolaine Frenette; Jocelyne Saint-Arnaud; Karim Serri
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Code status orders and goals of care in the medical ICU.

Authors:  Thomas G Gehlbach; Laura A Shinkunas; Valerie L Forman-Hoffman; Karl W Thomas; Gregory A Schmidt; Lauris C Kaldjian
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Shifting paradigm: From "No Code" and "Do-Not-Resuscitate" to "Goals of Care" policies.

Authors:  Yaseen M Arabi; Abdulla A Al-Sayyari; Mohamed S Al Moamary
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.219

7.  Do not intubate order, is the misunderstanding finally over?

Authors:  Cristoforo Incorvaia; Paolo Scarpazza; Gian Galeazzo Riario-Sforza
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 8.  Implementing communication and decision-making interventions directed at goals of care: a theory-led scoping review.

Authors:  Amanda Cummings; Susi Lund; Natasha Campling; Carl R May; Alison Richardson; Michelle Myall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.