Literature DB >> 21305893

Impact of biogenic emission uncertainties on the simulated response of ozone and fine particulate matter to anthropogenic emission reductions.

Christian Hogrefe1, Sastry S Isukapalli, Xiaogang Tang, Panos G Georgopoulos, Shan He, Eric E Zalewsky, Winston Hao, Jia-Yeong Ku, Tonalee Key, Gopal Sistla.   

Abstract

The role of emissions of volatile organic compounds and nitric oxide from biogenic sources is becoming increasingly important in regulatory air quality modeling as levels of anthropogenic emissions continue to decrease and stricter health-based air quality standards are being adopted. However, considerable uncertainties still exist in the current estimation methodologies for biogenic emissions. The impact of these uncertainties on ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels for the eastern United States was studied, focusing on biogenic emissions estimates from two commonly used biogenic emission models, the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) and the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS). Photochemical grid modeling simulations were performed for two scenarios: one reflecting present day conditions and the other reflecting a hypothetical future year with reductions in emissions of anthropogenic oxides of nitrogen (NOx). For ozone, the use of MEGAN emissions resulted in a higher ozone response to hypothetical anthropogenic NOx emission reductions compared with BEIS. Applying the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidance on regulatory air quality modeling in conjunction with typical maximum ozone concentrations, the differences in estimated future year ozone design values (DVF) stemming from differences in biogenic emissions estimates were on the order of 4 parts per billion (ppb), corresponding to approximately 5% of the daily maximum 8-hr ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) of 75 ppb. For PM2.5, the differences were 0.1-0.25 microg/m3 in the summer total organic mass component of DVFs, corresponding to approximately 1-2% of the value of the annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15 microg/m3. Spatial variations in the ozone and PM2.5 differences also reveal that the impacts of different biogenic emission estimates on ozone and PM2.5 levels are dependent on ambient levels of anthropogenic emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305893      PMCID: PMC3079461          DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.1.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  7 in total

1.  Cross influences of ozone and sulfate precursor emissions changes on air quality and climate.

Authors:  Nadine Unger; Drew T Shindell; Dorothy M Koch; David G Streets
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rethinking the assessment of photochemical modelin systems in air quality planning applications.

Authors:  Christian Hogrefe; Kevin L Civerolo; Winston Hao; Jia-Yeong Ku; Eric E Zalewsky; Gopal Sistla
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest.

Authors:  J Lelieveld; T M Butler; J N Crowley; T J Dillon; H Fischer; L Ganzeveld; H Harder; M G Lawrence; M Martinez; D Taraborrelli; J Williams
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study.

Authors:  W L Chameides; R W Lindsay; J Richardson; C S Kiang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Unexpected epoxide formation in the gas-phase photooxidation of isoprene.

Authors:  Fabien Paulot; John D Crounse; Henrik G Kjaergaard; Andreas Kürten; Jason M St Clair; John H Seinfeld; Paul O Wennberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Trends in speciated fine particulate matter and visibility across monitoring networks in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  Patricia F Brewer; Joseph P Adlhoch
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 7.  Plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ozone (O3) polluted atmospheres: the ecological effects.

Authors:  Delia M Pinto; James D Blande; Silvia R Souza; Anne-Marja Nerg; Jarmo K Holopainen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.626

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Biomass smoke in Burkina Faso: what is the relationship between particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and kitchen characteristics?

Authors:  S S Yamamoto; V R Louis; A Sié; R Sauerborn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Formaldehyde production from isoprene oxidation across NOx regimes.

Authors:  G M Wolfe; J Kaiser; T F Hanisco; F N Keutsch; J A de Gouw; J B Gilman; M Graus; C D Hatch; J Holloway; L W Horowitz; B H Lee; B M Lerner; F Lopez-Hilifiker; J Mao; M R Marvin; J Peischl; I B Pollack; J M Roberts; T B Ryerson; J A Thornton; P R Veres; C Warneke
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.133

3.  Co-benefits of global and regional greenhouse gas mitigation on U.S. air quality in 2050.

Authors:  Yuqiang Zhang; Jared H Bowden; Zachariah Adelman; Vaishali Naik; Larry W Horowitz; Steven J Smith; J Jason West
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.133

Review 4.  Bidirectional exchange of biogenic volatiles with vegetation: emission sources, reactions, breakdown and deposition.

Authors:  Ülo Niinemets; Silvano Fares; Peter Harley; Kolby J Jardine
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  Impact of intercontinental pollution transport on North American ozone air pollution: an HTAP phase 2 multi-model study.

Authors:  Min Huang; Gregory R Carmichael; R Bradley Pierce; Duseong S Jo; Rokjin J Park; Johannes Flemming; Louisa K Emmons; Kevin W Bowman; Daven K Henze; Yanko Davila; Kengo Sudo; Jan Eiof Jonson; Marianne Tronstad Lund; Greet Janssens-Maenhout; Frank J Dentener; Terry J Keating; Hilke Oetjen; Vivienne H Payne
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.133

6.  A fully integrated isoprenoid emissions model coupling emissions to photosynthetic characteristics.

Authors:  Rüdiger Grote; Catherine Morfopoulos; Ülo Niinemets; Zhihong Sun; Trevor F Keenan; Federica Pacifico; Tim Butler
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 7.228

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.