Literature DB >> 21305635

Imaging of gynecological disease (6): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian dysgerminoma.

S Guerriero1, A C Testa, D Timmerman, C Van Holsbeke, S Ajossa, D Fischerova, D Franchi, F P G Leone, E Domali, J L Alcazar, G Parodo, F Mascilini, B Virgilio, V N Demidov, J Lipatenkova, L Valentin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical history and ultrasound findings in patients with ovarian dysgerminoma.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian dysgerminoma who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination. The patients were identified from the databases of 11 ultrasound centers. The tumors were described by the principal investigator at each contributing center on the basis of ultrasound images, ultrasound reports and research protocols (when applicable) using the terms and definitions of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. In addition, three authors reviewed all available electronic ultrasound images (gray-scale images and color/power Doppler images were available for 18 patients and 14 patients, respectively) and described them using subjective evaluation of gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound findings (here called pattern recognition).
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with ovarian dysgerminoma were identified (including one woman with bilateral masses). Twenty patients had a primary ovarian dysgerminoma (including the one with bilateral masses) and one patient had a recurrence of dysgerminoma in her retained ovary. One of the 21 patients was pregnant. All tumors except one were pure dysgerminomas, one being a mixed germinal cell tumor with 30% dysgerminoma component. Median age was 20 (range, 16-31) years. Information on clinical symptoms was available for 18 patients. In four patients, the tumor was detected incidentally, whereas 14 patients presented with one or more of the following symptoms: acute pain (n = 4), chronic pain (n = 8), bloating (n = 8), menstrual disorders (n = 5) and infertility problems (n = 1). One (5%) patient had ascites. Using the IOTA terms and definitions, all but one dysgerminoma were moderately (43%) or very well (50%) vascularized solid tumors. One tumor was multilocular-solid. According to pattern recognition, most dysgerminomas were highly vascularized, purely solid tumors with heterogeneous internal echogenicity divided into several lobules, had a smooth and sometimes lobulated contour and were well-defined relative to the surrounding organs.
CONCLUSION: The ultrasound finding of a highly vascularized, large, solid, lobulated adnexal mass with irregular internal echogenicity in a woman 20-30 years old should raise the suspicion of ovarian dysgerminoma.
Copyright © 2011 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305635     DOI: 10.1002/uog.8958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  9 in total

1.  A pelvic mass on ultrasonography and high human chorionic gonadotropin level: not always an ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Alexandre Rozenholc; Jasmine Abdulcadir; Marie-Françoise Pelte; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric adnexal masses and mimics.

Authors:  Christopher Z Lam; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 3.  Ovarian dysgerminoma in pregnancy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Ying Luo; Cha Han; Wenyan Tian; Wen Yang; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Francesca Moro; Rosanna Esposito; Chiara Landolfo; Wouter Froyman; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin; Antonia Carla Testa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 5.  Non-Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: How Much Do We Really Know?

Authors:  Alison Cheung; Sidrah Shah; Jack Parker; Pavandeep Soor; Anu Limbu; Matin Sheriff; Stergios Boussios
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Uncommon Metastasis of Ovarian Dysgerminoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mihaela Camelia Tîrnovanu; Irina Daniela Florea; Adina Tănase; Bogdan Florin Toma; Elena Cojocaru; Carmen Ungureanu; Ludmila Lozneanu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 7.  ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound indicators of neoplastic risk in preoperative differentiation of adnexal masses.

Authors:  Nabil Abdalla; Michał Bachanek; Seweryn Trojanowski; Krzysztof Cendrowski; Włodzimierz Sawicki
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 9.  Pregnancy with giant ovarian dysgerminoma: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xi-Wen Zhang; Li-Rong Zhai; Dong-Wei Huang; Zhen-De Jiang; Tong Yu; Shu-Yan Liu; Man-Hua Cui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.