Literature DB >> 21305524

The effects of golimumab on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: results of randomized controlled studies of golimumab before methotrexate therapy and golimumab after methotrexate therapy.

Paul Emery1, Roy Fleischmann, Désirée van der Heijde, Edward C Keystone, Mark C Genovese, Philip G Conaghan, Elizabeth C Hsia, Weichun Xu, Anna Baratelle, Anna Beutler, Mahboob U Rahman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of golimumab on radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients (in the Golimumab Before Employing Methotrexate as theFirst-Line Option in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of Early Onset [GO-BEFORE] study; n = 637)and patients with active RA despite MTX therapy (in the Golimumab in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy [GO-FORWARD] study; n =444) were randomly assigned to receive placebo plus MTX (group 1), golimumab 100 mg plus placebo (group 2), golimumab 50 mg plus MTX (group 3), or golimumab 100 mg plus MTX (group 4). Golimumab orplacebo was administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks. Radiographs of the hands and feet were taken at baseline, week 28, and week 52 in the GO-BEFORE study and at baseline, week 24 (week 16 for patients who entered early escape), and week 52 in the GO-FORWARD study. Radiographs were scored by 2 independent readers in each study using the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp score.
RESULTS: In the GO-BEFORE study, the mean ± SD changes in the modified Sharp score from base line to week 52 (control period) were 1.4 ± 4.6 in group 1, 1.3 ± 6.2 in group 2 (P = 0.266), 0.7 ± 5.2 in group 3 (P = 0.015), and 0.1 ± 1.8 in group 4 (P = 0.025). In the GO-FORWARD study, changes from baseline to week 24 (control period) were 0.6 ± 2.4 in group 1, 0.3 ± 1.6 in group 2 (P = 0.361), 0.6 ± 2.7 in group 3 (P = 0.953), and 0.2 ± 1.3 in group 4 (P = 0.293).
CONCLUSION: Golimumab in combination with MTX inhibited radiographic progression significantly better than did MTX alone in the GO-BEFORE study. Radiographic progression in the GO-FORWARD study was minimal in all treatment arms, precluding an adequate assessment of the effect of golimumab on radiographic progression in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305524     DOI: 10.1002/art.30263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  34 in total

Review 1.  Radiological outcomes in randomized controlled trials on biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review.

Authors:  E Bizzi; U Massafra; B Laganà; V Bruzzese; A Picchianti Diamanti; M Cassol; A Migliore
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  [Systematic literature research for S1 guidelines on sequential medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  K Albrecht; K Krüger; U Müller-Ladner; J Wollenhaupt
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 3.  Differential Effects of Inflammation on Bone and Response to Biologics in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Zheni Stavre; Katherine Upchurch; Jonathan Kay; Ellen M Gravallese
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Assessment of clinical efficacy and safety in a randomized double-blind study of etanercept and sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis from Eastern/Central Europe, Latin America, and Asia.

Authors:  Nemanja Damjanov; Waleed Al Shehhi; Feng Huang; Sameer Kotak; Ruben Burgos-Vargas; Khalid Shirazy; Eustratios Bananis; Annette Szumski; Lyndon J Q Llamado; Ehab Mahgoub
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: new insights from old clinical data?

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha; Kurt Redlich
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Validity of early MRI structural damage end points and potential impact on clinical trial design in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Joshua F Baker; Philip G Conaghan; Paul Emery; Daniel G Baker; Mikkel Østergaard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glen S Hazlewood; Cheryl Barnabe; George Tomlinson; Deborah Marshall; Daniel J A Devoe; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-29

8.  Regional differences in baseline disease activity and remission rates following golimumab treatment for RA: results from the GO-MORE trial.

Authors:  Patrick Durez; Karel Pavelka; Maria Alicia Lazaro; Abraham Garcia-Kutzbach; Robert J Moots; Howard Amital; Marinella Govoni; Nathan Vastesaeger
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  The role of biologic agents in damage progression in rheumatoid arthritis: indirect comparison of data coming from randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ennio Giulio Favalli; Francesca Pregnolato; Martina Biggioggero; Pier Luigi Meroni
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.346

10.  Efficacy of golimumab plus methotrexate in methotrexate-naïve patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Paul Emery; Roy M Fleischmann; Elizabeth C Hsia; Stephen Xu; Yiying Zhou; Daniel Baker
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.