Literature DB >> 21305329

Perceptual mechanism underlying gaze guidance in chimpanzees and humans.

Fumihiro Kano1, Masaki Tomonaga.   

Abstract

Previous studies comparing eye movements between humans and their closest relatives, chimpanzees, have revealed similarities and differences between the species in terms of where individuals fixate their gaze during free viewing of a naturalistic scene, including social stimuli (e.g. body and face). However, those results were somewhat confounded by the fact that gaze behavior is influenced by low-level stimulus properties (e.g., color and form) and by high-level processes such as social sensitivity and knowledge about the scene. Given the known perceptual and cognitive similarities between chimpanzees and humans, it is expected that such low-level effects do not play a critical role in explaining the high-level similarities and differences between the species. However, there is no quantitative evidence to support this assumption. To estimate the effect of local stimulus saliency on such eye-movement patterns, this study used a well-established bottom-up saliency model. In addition, to elucidate the cues that the viewers use to guide their gaze, we presented scenes in which we had manipulated various stimulus properties. As expected, the saliency model did not fully predict the fixation patterns actually observed in chimpanzees and humans. In addition, both species used multiple cues to fixate socially significant areas such as the face. There was no evidence suggesting any differences between chimpanzees and humans in their responses to low-level saliency. Therefore, this study found a substantial amount of similarity in the perceptual mechanisms underlying gaze guidance in chimpanzees and humans and thereby offers a foundation for direct comparisons between them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21305329     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-010-0372-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Roberto A Gulli; Lauren H Howard; Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Amy M Ryan; Annika Paukner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06

2.  GraFIX: a semiautomatic approach for parsing low- and high-quality eye-tracking data.

Authors:  Irati R Saez de Urabain; Mark H Johnson; Tim J Smith
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-03

3.  Comparison of dogs and humans in visual scanning of social interaction.

Authors:  Heini Törnqvist; Sanni Somppi; Aija Koskela; Christina M Krause; Outi Vainio; Miiamaaria V Kujala
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  A model of face selection in viewing video stories.

Authors:  Yuki Suda; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Individual Differences in Infant Oculomotor Behavior During the Viewing of Complex Naturalistic Scenes.

Authors:  Sam V Wass; Tim J Smith
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014-07

6.  Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Cordelia Mühlenbeck; Thomas Jacobsen; Carla Pritsch; Katja Liebal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-23

7.  Preferential Processing of Social Features and Their Interplay with Physical Saliency in Complex Naturalistic Scenes.

Authors:  Albert End; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.