Literature DB >> 21304733

Non-contiguous finished genome sequence of Aminomonas paucivorans type strain (GLU-3).

Sam Pitluck, Montri Yasawong, Brittany Held, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Alex Copeland, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Olga Chertkov, Lynne Goodwin, Roxane Tapia, Cliff Han, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Galina Ovchinnikova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Rüdiger Pukall, Stefan Spring, Manfred Rohde, Johannes Sikorski, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Aminomonas paucivorans Baena et al. 1999 is the type species of the genus Aminomonas, which belongs to the family Synergistaceae. The species is of interest because it is an asaccharolytic chemoorganotrophic bacterium which ferments quite a number of amino acids. This is the first finished genome sequence (with one gap in a rDNA region) of a member of the genus Aminomonas and the third sequence from the family Synergistaceae. The 2,630,120 bp long genome with its 2,433 protein-coding and 61 RNA genes is a part of the GenomicEncyclopedia ofBacteria andArchaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Gram-negative; Synergistaceae; asaccharolytic; chemoorganotrophic; mesophilic; nonmotile; obligate amino-acid-degrading; strictly anaerobic; ‘Synergistetes’

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304733      PMCID: PMC3035310          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1253298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain GLU-3T (= DSM 12260 = ATCC BAA-6) is the type strain of the species Aminomonas paucivorans, which in turn is the type and only species of the genus Aminomonas [1,2]. The generic name derives from the Latin word ‘aminum’ meaning ‘amine’ and the Greek word ‘monas’ meaning ‘a unit or monad’, referring to amine-degrading monads [2]. The species epithet is derived from the Latin word ‘paucus’ meaning ‘few or little’ and the Latin word ‘vorans’ meaning ‘digesting’, referring to digesting little [2]. Strain GLU-3T was isolated from anaerobic sludge of a dairy wastewater treatment plant in SantaFe de Bogota, Colombia [2]. So far, no further isolates have been obtained for A. paucivorans. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for A. paucivorans GLU-3T, together with the description of the non-contiguous finished genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The 16S rRNA gene of A. paucivorans GLU-3T shares 96% sequence identity with that of the type strain of Thermanaerovibrio acidaminovorans, which was isolated from an upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor of a sugar refinery, Breda, the Netherlands [3] (Figure 1), and 82.2-96.4% sequence identity with the type strains from the other members of the family Synergistaceae [11]. The sequences of four marine metagenomic clones in the env_nt database, 1096626071844 (AACY020063505), 1096626840052 (AACY020539193), 1096626748225 (AACY020105546) and 1096626774924 (AACY020274567) share 96% sequence identity with A. paucivorans GLU-3T (as of October 2010). A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of A. paucivorans was compared using NCBI BLAST under default values with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [12] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords, weighted by BLAST scores, were determined. The four most frequent genera were Thermanaerovibrio (65.5%), Aminomonas (18.0%), Anaerobaculum (9.0%) and Aminiphilus (7.6%). The species yielding the highest score was T. acidaminovorans. The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'anaerobic' (7.2%), 'sludge' (6.9%), 'wastewater' (6.8%), 'municipal' (6.8%) and 'digester' (6.7%). These keywords corroborate the physiological and ecological features on strain GLU-3T as depicted in the original description [2].The single most frequent keyword within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species was 'harbor/sediment' (50.0%).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. paucivorans GLU-3T relative to the other type strains within the family Synergistaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,347 aligned characters [4,5] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [6] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [7] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [8] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [3,9,10].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of A. paucivorans GLU-3T relative to the other type strains within the family Synergistaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,347 aligned characters [4,5] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [6] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [7] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [8] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold [3,9,10]. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of A. paucivorans GLU-3T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome of A. paucivorans differ from each other by up to one nucleotide, and differ by up to eleven nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AF072581), which contains 59 ambiguous base calls (ambiguous bases not count as differences). A. paucivorans GLU-3T is described as Gram-negative, slightly curved, rod-shaped bacterium (0.3 × 4.0-6.0 µm), which occurs singly or in pairs (Figure 2 and Table 1). Colonies of strain GLU-3T are round, smooth and white, with a diameter up to 1 mm [2]. Strain GLU-3T does not produce endospores [2]. The organism does not have flagella and motility is not observed [2], although plenty of motility genes are present in the genome. Strain GLU-3T is a strictly anaerobic, mesophilic, chemoorganotrophic and asaccharolytic bacterium [2]. The temperature range for growth is 20-40°C, with an optimum at 35°C [2]. The pH range for growth is 6.7-8.3, with an optimum at 7.5 [2]. The organism does not require NaCl for growth but tolerates up to 2.0% [2]. The optimum growth occurs in media with 0.05-0.5% of NaCl [2]. The species requires yeast extract for growth [2]. The organism is able to ferment arginine, histidine, glutamine, threonine, and glycine [2]. Arginine is fermented to acetate, formate and ornithine [2]. Histidine is fermented to acetate and formate [2]. Glutamate is fermented to acetate, formate and trace amounts of propionate [2]. Threonine and glycine are fermented to acetate [2]. Casamino acid, peptone and cysteine are only poorly used by the strain GLU-3T, and acetate is the end-product of the amino acid metabolism [2]. A mixed culture of strain GLU-3T and Methanobacterium formicicum does not extend the range of substrate utilization [2], as is observed for, e.g., Aminobacterium colombiense - [9]. Methane is not detectable in mixed cultures, when grown in glycine and threonine [2], however, the end-product profiles are the same as in pure culture [2]. The major end-product is shifted from acetate to propionate, when strain GLU-3T was grown together with M. formicicum on arginine, histidine and glutamate [2]. Ornithine is not accumulated during arginine degradation in mixed culture [2]. Strain GLU-3T does not degrade alanine and branched-chain amino acids, valine, leucine and isoleucine either in pure culture or in syntrophic growth with M. formicicum [2]. Also, the range of amino acid utilization is not increased in co-culture with M. formicicum [2]. Strain GLU-3T does not grow on carbohydrates, gelatin, casein, pyruvate, succinate, malate, fumarate, α-ketoglutarate, mesaconate, β-methylaspartate, oxaloacetate, glycerol, ethanol, acetate, propionate, butyrate, lactate, citrate, leucine, lysine, alanine, valine, proline, serine, methionine, asparagines, phenylalanine and aspartate [2]. The organism does not utilize sulfate, thiosulfate, elemental sulfur, sulfite, nitrate and fumarate as electron acceptors [2].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of A. paucivorans GLU-3T

Table 1

Classification and general features of A. paucivorans GLU-3T according to the MIGS recommendations [13].

MIGS ID   Property   Term   Evidence code
   Current classification   Domain Bacteria   TAS [14]
   Phylum “Synergistetes   TAS [15]
   Class Synergistia   TAS [15]
   Order Synergistales   TAS [15]
   Family Synergistaceae   TAS [15]
   Genus Aminomonas   TAS [2]
   Species Aminomonas paucivorans   TAS [2]
   Type strain GLU-3   TAS [2]
   Gram stain   negative   TAS [2]
   Cell shape   slightly curved rods occurring singly   or in pairs   TAS [2]
   Motility   none   TAS [2]
   Sporulation   none   TAS [2]
   Temperature range   20°C-40°C   TAS [2]
   Optimum temperature   35°C   TAS [2]
   Salinity   0-2% NaCl (optimum 0.05-0.50%)   TAS [2]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement   strictly anaerobic   TAS [2]
   Carbon source   amino acids   TAS [2]
   Energy source   chemoorganotroph   TAS [2]
MIGS-6   Habitat   wastewater   TAS [2]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship   free-living   NAS
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity   none   NAS
   Biosafety level   1   TAS [16]
   Isolation   anaerobic sludge of a dairy   wastewater treatment plant   TAS [2]
MIGS-4   Geographic location   SantaFe de Bogota, Colombia   TAS [2]
MIGS-5   Sample collection time   1996   NAS
MIGS-4.1   Latitude   4.60   NAS
MIGS-4.2   Longitude   74.08   NAS
MIGS-4.3   Depth   not reported
MIGS-4.4   Altitude   2620 m   NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [17]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of A. paucivorans GLU-3T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [17]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

No chemotaxonomic data are currently available for A. paucivorans or for other members of the genus Aminomonas.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [18], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [19]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [8,20] and the non-contiguous finished genome sequence has been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession AEIV00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, AEIV01000000. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID    Property    Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality    Non-contiguous finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used    Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,    454 PE library (12 kb insert size),    one Illumina standard library
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms    454 GS FLX Titanium, Illumina GAii
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage    202.0 × Illumina; 72.4× pyrosequence
MIGS-30    Assemblers    Newbler version 2.0.00.20-    PostRelease-11-05-2008-gcc-3.4.6,    phrap
MIGS-32    Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID    CM001022, AEIV00000000
    Genbank Date of Release    November 2, 2010
    GOLD ID    Gi02542
    NCBI project ID    33371
    Database: IMG-GEBA    2502790015
MIGS-13    Source material identifier    DSM 12260
    Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

A. paucivorans GLU-3T, DSM 12260, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 846 (Anaerobic Serine/Arginine medium) [21] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using the MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/LALM for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [19].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [22]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.0.00.20-PostRelease-11-05-2008-gcc-3.4.6 (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisted of 126 contigs in 103 scaffolds and was converted into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus for collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (525.3 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [23] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 190.7 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters were -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [24] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/), Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI) [25]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 259 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software (Polisher) developed at JGI [26]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 274.4× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 535, 052 pyrosequences and 15,007,632 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [27] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [28]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [29].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,630,120 bp long chromosome with an overall GC content of 67.6% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,494 genes predicted, 2,433 were protein-coding genes, and 61 RNAs; 34 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (77.2%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute   Value   % of Total
Genome size (bp)   2,630,120   100.00%
DNA Coding region (bp)   2,411,389   91.68%
DNA G+C content (bp)   1,777,554   67.59%
Number of replicons   1
Extrachromosomal elements   0
Total genes   2,494   100.00%
RNA genes   61   2.45%
rRNA operons   3
Protein-coding genes   2,433   97.55%
Pseudo genes   34   1.36%
Genes with function prediction   1,926   77.23%
Genes in paralog clusters   338   13.55%
Genes assigned to COGs   1,988   79.71%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   2,047   82.08%
Genes with signal peptides   446   17.88%
Genes with transmembrane helices   588   23.58%
CRISPR repeats   4
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value    %age    Description
J    158    7.2Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0    0.0RNA processing and modification
K    138    6.3Transcription
L    107    4.9Replication, recombination and repair
B    0    0.0Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    29    1.3Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0.0Nuclear structure
V    33    1.5Defense mechanisms
T    154    7.0Signal transduction mechanisms
M    123    5.6Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    90    4.1Cell motility
Z    0    0.0Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0Extracellular structures
U    48    2.2Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    64    2.9Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    161    7.3Energy production and conversion
G    104    4.7Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    251    11.4Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    71    3.2Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    111    5.0Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    35    1.6Lipid transport and metabolism
P    102    4.6Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    25    1.1Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    236    10.7General function prediction only
S    166    7.5Function unknown
-    506    20.3Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  22 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Complete genome sequence of Aminobacterium colombiense type strain (ALA-1).

Authors:  Olga Chertkov; Johannes Sikorski; Evelyne Brambilla; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; John C Detter; David Bruce; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Stefan Spring; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-06-15

9.  Complete genome sequence of Thermanaerovibrio acidaminovorans type strain (Su883).

Authors:  Mansi Chovatia; Johannes Sikorski; Maren Schröder; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Hope Tice; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Alex Copeland; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Feng Chen; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Galina Ovchinnikova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Patrick Chain; Elizabeth Saunders; John C Detter; Thomas Brettin; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Stefan Spring; Jim Bristow; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2009-11-22

10.  Permanent draft genome sequence of Dethiosulfovibrio peptidovorans type strain (SEBR 4207).

Authors:  Kurt Labutti; Shanmugam Mayilraj; Alicia Clum; Susan Lucas; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Matt Nolan; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Lynne Goodwin; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-08-20
View more
  3 in total

1.  Genome sequence of the moderately thermophilic, amino-acid-degrading and sulfur-reducing bacterium Thermovirga lienii type strain (Cas60314(T)).

Authors:  Markus Göker; Elisabeth Saunders; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; John C Detter; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-05-04

2.  Genome sequence of the moderately thermophilic sulfur-reducing bacterium Thermanaerovibrio velox type strain (Z-9701(T)) and emended description of the genus Thermanaerovibrio.

Authors:  Krishna Palaniappan; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Hazuki Teshima; Matt Nolan; Alla Lapidus; Hope Tice; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Jan-Fang Cheng; Cliff Han; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Manfred Rohde; Shanmugam Mayilraj; Stefan Spring; John C Detter; Markus Göker; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Tanja Woyke
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-10-02

3.  Complete genome sequence of the moderate thermophile Anaerobaculum mobile type strain (NGA(T)).

Authors:  Konstantinos Mavromatis; Erko Stackebrandt; Brittany Held; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; John C Detter; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-04-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.