Literature DB >> 21304710

Complete genome sequence of Brachyspira murdochii type strain (56-150).

Amrita Pati, Johannes Sikorski, Sabine Gronow, Christine Munk, Alla Lapidus, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Tio, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Feng Chen, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, John C Detter, David Bruce, Roxanne Tapia, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Stefan Spring, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.   

Abstract

Brachyspira murdochii Stanton et al. 1992 is a non-pathogenic, host-associated spirochete of the family Brachyspiraceae. Initially isolated from the intestinal content of a healthy swine, the 'group B spirochaetes' were first described as Serpulina murdochii. Members of the family Brachyspiraceae are of great phylogenetic interest because of the extremely isolated location of this family within the phylum 'Spirochaetes'. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first completed genome sequence of a type strain of a member of the family Brachyspiraceae and only the second genome sequence from a member of the genus Brachyspira. The 3,241,804 bp long genome with its 2,893 protein-coding and 40 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachyspiraceae; GEBA; Gram-negative; Spirochaetes; anaerobic; host-associated; motile; non-pathogenic

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304710      PMCID: PMC3035287          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.831993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain 56-150T (= DSM 12563 = ATCC 51284 = CIP 105832) is the type strain of the species Brachyspira murdochii. This strain was first described as Serpulina murdochii [1,2], and later transferred to the genus Brachyspira [3]. The genus Brachyspira currently consists of seven species, with Brachyspira aalborgi as the type species [4,5]. The genus Brachyspira is the only genus in the not yet formally described family ‘Brachyspiraceae’ [6,7]. The generic name derives from ‘brachys’, Greek for short, and ‘spira’, Latin for a coil, a helix, to mean ‘a short helix’ [5]. The species name for B. murdochii derives from the city of Murdoch, in recognition of work conducted at Murdoch University in Western Australia, where the type strain was identified [1]. Some species of the genus Brachyspira cause swine dysentery and porcine intestinal spirochetosis. Swine dysentery is a severe, mucohemorrhagic disease that sometimes leads to death of the animals [1]. B. murdochii is generally not considered to be a pathogen, although occasionally it has been seen in association with colitis in pigs [3,8], and was also associated with clinical problems on certain farms [9-11]. In 1992, a user-friendly and robust novel PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the Brachyspira nox-gene was developed, which allows one to identify, with high specificity, members of B. murdochii using only two restriction endonucleases [12]. More recently, a multi-locus sequence typing scheme was developed that facilitates the identification of Brachyspira species and reveals the intraspecies diversity of B. murdochii [13] (see also http://pubmlst.org/brachyspira/). Only one genome of a member of the family ‘Brachyspiraceae’ been sequenced to date: B. hyodysenteriae strain WA1 [14],. It is an intestinal pathogen of pigs. Based on 16S rRNA sequence this strain is 0.8% different from strain 56-150T. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. murdochii 56-150T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Brachyspira species colonize the lower intestinal tract (cecum and colons) of animals and humans [6]. The type of B. murdochii, 56-150T, was isolated from a healthy swine in Canada [1,15]. Other isolates have been obtained from wild rats in Ohio, USA, from laboratory rats in Murdoch, Western Australia [16], and from the joint fluid of a lame pig [17]. Further isolates have been obtained from the feces or gastrointestinal tract of pigs in Canada, Tasmania, Queensland, and Western Australia [2,15]. The type strains of the other species of the genus Brachyspira share 95.9-99.4% 16S rRNA sequence identity with strain 56-150T. GenBank contains 16S rRNA sequences for about 250 Brachyspira isolates, all of which share at least 96% sequence identity with strain 56-150T [18]. The closest related type strain of a species outside of the Brachyspira, but within the order Spirochaetales, is Turneriella parva [19], which exhibits only 75% 16S rRNA sequence similarity [18]. 16S rRNA sequences from environmental samples and metagenomic surveys do not exceed 78-79% sequence similarity to strain 56-150T, with the sole exception of one clone from a metagenome analysis of human diarrhea [20], indicating that members of the species, genus and even family are poorly represented in the habitats outside of various animal intestines screened thus far (status March 2010). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of B. murdochii 56-150T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequence of the single 16S rRNA gene in the genome sequence is identical with the previously published 16S rRNA gene sequence generated from DSM 12563 (AY312492).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of B. murdochii 56-150T relative to the other type strains within the genus and to the type strains of the other genera within the class Spirochaetes (excluding members of the Spirochaetaceae). The tree was inferred from 1,396 aligned characters [21,22] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [23] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if [24] larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [25] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of B. murdochii 56-150T relative to the other type strains within the genus and to the type strains of the other genera within the class Spirochaetes (excluding members of the Spirochaetaceae). The tree was inferred from 1,396 aligned characters [21,22] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [23] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if [24] larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [25] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. The cells of B. murdochii 56-l50T were 5 - 8 by 0.35 - 0.4 µm in size (Table 1 and Figure 2), and each cell possessed 22 to 26 flagella (11 to 13 inserted at each end) [1]. In brain/heart infusion broth containing 10% calf serum (BHIS) under an N2-O2 (99::l) atmosphere, strain 56-150T had optimum growth temperatures of 39 to 42°C (shortest population doubling times and highest final population densities) [1]. In BHIS broth at 39°C, the doubling times of strain 56-150T were 2 to 4 h, and the final population densities were 0.5 x l09 to 2.0 x l09 cells/ml. Strain 56-150T did not grow at 32 or 47°C [1].
Table 1

Classification and general features of B. murdochii 56-150T according to the MIGS recommendations [26]

MIGS ID    Property     Term   Evidence code
    Current classification     Domain Bacteria   TAS [27]
     Phylum Spirochaetes   TAS [28]
     Class Spirochaetes   TAS [28]
     Order Spirochaetales   TAS [29,30]
     Family Brachyspiraceae   TAS [31]
     Genus Brachyspira   TAS [5]
     Species Brachyspira murdochii   TAS [1]
     Type strain 56-150   TAS [1]
    Gram stain     negative   TAS [1]
    Cell shape     helical cells with regular coiling pattern   TAS [1]
    Motility     motile (periplasmic flagella)   TAS [1]
    Sporulation     non-sporulating   TAS [1]
    Temperature range     does not grow at 32°C or 47°C   TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature     39°C   TAS [1]
    Salinity     unknown   TAS
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement     anaerobic, aerotolerant   TAS [1]
    Carbon source     soluble sugars   TAS [1]
    Energy source     chemoorganotrophic   TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat     animal intestinal tract   TAS [6]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship     host-associated   TAS [32]
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity     no   TAS [33]
    Biosafety level     1   TAS [34]
    Isolation     swine   TAS [15]
MIGS-4    Geographic location     Quebec, Canada   TAS [15]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time     1992   TAS [15]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2    Latitude    Longitude     52.939     -73.549   TAS [1]   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.3    Depth     not reported   TAS
MIGS-4.4    Altitude     not reported   TAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [35]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of B. murdochii 56-150T

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [35]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements Scanning electron micrograph of B. murdochii 56-150T Substrates that support growth of strain 56-150T in HS broth (basal heart infusion broth containing 10% fetal calf serum) include glucose, fructose, sucrose, N-acetylglucosamine, pyruvate, L-fucose, cellobiose, trehalose, maltose, mannose, and lactose, but not galactose, D-fucose, glucosamine, ribose, raffinose, rhamnose, or xylose [1]. In HS broth supplemented with 0.4% glucose under an N2-O2 (99:l) atmosphere, the metabolic end products of strain 56-150T are acetate, butyrate, ethanol, CO2, and H2. Strain 56-150T produces more H2 than CO2 [1], which is indicative of NADH-ferredoxin oxidoreductase reaction [6]. The ethanol is likely to be formed from acetyl-CoA by the enzymes acetaldehyde dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase [6]. Strain 56-150T is weakly hemolytic, negative for indole production, does not hydrolyze hippurate, is negative for α-galactosidase and α-glucosidase activity, but positive for β-glucosidase activity [1]. Strain 56-150T is anaerobic but aerotolerant [1]. Minimal inhibitory concentrations have been determined for strain 56-150T for tiamulin hydrogen fumarate, tylosin tartrate, erythromycin, clindamycin hydrochloride, virginiamycin, and carbadox [36]. Several strains of B. murdochii have been described to be naturally resistant against the rifampicin [7,32]. Also, a ring test for quality assessment for diagnostics and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the genus Brachyspira has been reported [37].

Chemotaxonomy

At present there are no reports on the chemotaxonomy of B. murdochii. However, some data are available for B. innocens (formerly classified as Treponema innocens [6]), the species that is currently most closely related to B. murdochii [13]. B. innocens cellular phospholipids and glycolipids were found to contain acyl (fatty acids with ester linkage) with alkenyl (unsaturated alcohol with ether linkage) side chains [6,38]. The glycolipid of B. innocens contains monoglycosyldiglyceride (MGDG) and, in most strains, acylMGDG is also found, with galactose as the predominant sugar moiety [38].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [39], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [40]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [25] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID    Property      Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality      Finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used      Four genomic libraries: two Sanger 6kb      and 8 kb pMCL200 library,      one fosmid library, one 454 standard library
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms      ABI3730, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage      19.7× Sanger; 48.9× pyrosequence
MIGS-30    Assemblers      Newbler version 1.1.02.15, phrap
MIGS-32    Gene calling method      Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID      CP001959
    Genbank Date of Release      May 13, 2010
    GOLD ID      Gc01276
    NCBI project ID      29543
    Database: IMG-GEBA      2502422316
MIGS-13    Source material identifier      DSM 12563
    Project relevance      Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

B. murdochii, strain 56-150T, DSM 12563, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 840 (Serpulina murdochii medium) [41] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with lysis modification st/L according to Wu et al. [40].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). In total, 861,386 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 3,554 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible misassemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher or transposon bombing of bridging clones [42]. A total of 300 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms provided 68.6× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 79,829 Sanger reads and 861,386 pyrosequencing reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [43] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [44]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [45].

Genome properties

The genome is 3,241,804 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with an overall GC content of 27.8% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,893 genes predicted, 2,853 were protein-coding genes, and 40 RNAs. A total of 44 pseudogenes were identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (66.2%) were assigned a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue  % of Total
Genome size (bp)3,241,804  100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)2,841,470  87.65%
DNA G+C content (bp)899,647  27.75%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes2,893  100.00%
RNA genes40  1.38%
rRNA operons1
Protein-coding genes2,893  98.62%
Pseudo genes44  1.52%
Genes with function prediction1,914  66.16%
Genes in paralog clusters610  21.09%
Genes assigned to COGs1,815  62.74%
Genes assigned Pfam domains1,973  68.20%
Genes with signal peptides577  19.94%
Genes with transmembrane helices737  25.48%
CRISPR repeats2
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   value   %age    Description
J   134   6.6    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   1   0.0    RNA processing and modification
K   81   4.0    Transcription
L   104   5.2    Replication, recombination and repair
B   0   0.0    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   20   1.0    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0   0.0    Nuclear structure
V   44   2.2    Defense mechanisms
T   116   5.8    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   143   7.1    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   100   5.0    Cell motility
Z   0   0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0   0.0    Extracellular structures
U   51   2.5    Intracellular trafficking secretion, and vesicular transport
O   62   3.1    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   111   5.5    Energy production and conversion
G   143   7.1    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   185   9.2    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   56   2.8    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   67   3.3    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   53   2.6    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   99   4.9    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   20   1.0    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   286   14.2    General function prediction only
S   143   7.1    Function unknown
-   1,078   37.3    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  38 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet.

Authors:  J P Euzéby
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-04

4.  Reclassification of Leptospira parva Hovind-Hougen et al. 1982 as Turneriella parva gen. nov., comb. nov.

Authors:  P N Levett; R E Morey; R Galloway; A G Steigerwalt; W A Ellis
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Serpulina alvinipulli sp. nov., a new Serpulina species that is enteropathogenic for chickens.

Authors:  T B Stanton; D Postic; N S Jensen
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1998-07

Review 6.  Phylogenetic foundation of spirochetes.

Authors:  B J Paster; F E Dewhirst
Journal:  J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2000-10

7.  Genome sequence of the pathogenic intestinal spirochete brachyspira hyodysenteriae reveals adaptations to its lifestyle in the porcine large intestine.

Authors:  Matthew I Bellgard; Phatthanaphong Wanchanthuek; Tom La; Karon Ryan; Paula Moolhuijzen; Zayed Albertyn; Babak Shaban; Yair Motro; David S Dunn; David Schibeci; Adam Hunter; Roberto Barrero; Nyree D Phillips; David J Hampson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identification of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and other pathogenic Brachyspira species in chickens from laying flocks with diarrhea or reduced production or both.

Authors:  Anneke Feberwee; David J Hampson; Nyree D Phillips; Tom La; Harold M J F van der Heijden; Gerard J Wellenberg; R Marius Dwars; Wil J M Landman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of porcine Brachyspira (Serpulina) species isolates.

Authors:  M Karlsson; C Fellström; A Gunnarsson; A Landén; A Franklin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  9 in total

1.  Characterization and Recognition of Brachyspira hampsonii sp. nov., a Novel Intestinal Spirochete That Is Pathogenic to Pigs.

Authors:  Nandita S Mirajkar; Nyree D Phillips; Tom La; David J Hampson; Connie J Gebhart
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Complete genome sequence of Brachyspira intermedia reveals unique genomic features in Brachyspira species and phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Therese Håfström; Désirée S Jansson; Bo Segerman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Brachyspira suanatina sp. nov., an enteropathogenic intestinal spirochaete isolated from pigs and mallards: genomic and phenotypic characteristics.

Authors:  Mamoona Mushtaq; Saima Zubair; Therese Råsbäck; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff; Désirée S Jansson
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  A phylogenomic and molecular signature based approach for characterization of the phylum Spirochaetes and its major clades: proposal for a taxonomic revision of the phylum.

Authors:  Radhey S Gupta; Sharmeen Mahmood; Mobolaji Adeolu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Genome sequence of the free-living aerobic spirochete Turneriella parva type strain (H(T)), and emendation of the species Turneriella parva.

Authors:  Erko Stackebrandt; Olga Chertkov; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Chongle Pan; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Markus Göker; John C Detter; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-05-25

6.  Complete genome sequence of the halophilic bacterium Spirochaeta africana type strain (Z-7692(T)) from the alkaline Lake Magadi in the East African Rift.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolos; Birte Abt; Carmen Scheuner; Hazuki Teshima; Brittany Held; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Manfred Rohde; Brian J Tindall; John C Detter; Markus Göker; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Tanja Woyke; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-05-20

7.  Genome sequence of the phylogenetically isolated spirochete Leptonema illini type strain (3055(T)).

Authors:  Marcel Huntemann; Erko Stackebrandt; Brittany Held; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Manfred Rohde; Sabine Gronow; Markus Göker; John C Detter; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Tanja Woyke; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Alla Lapidus
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-05-25

8.  Evidence of homologous recombination as a driver of diversity in Brachyspira pilosicoli.

Authors:  Anish Pandey; Maria Victoria Humbert; Alexandra Jackson; Jade L Passey; David J Hampson; David W Cleary; Roberto M La Ragione; Myron Christodoulides
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2020-11-11

9.  Comparative genomics of Brachyspira pilosicoli strains: genome rearrangements, reductions and correlation of genetic compliment with phenotypic diversity.

Authors:  Luke J Mappley; Michael L Black; Manal AbuOun; Alistair C Darby; Martin J Woodward; Julian Parkhill; A Keith Turner; Matthew I Bellgard; Tom La; Nyree D Phillips; Roberto M La Ragione; David J Hampson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.