Literature DB >> 21304699

Complete genome sequence of Nakamurella multipartita type strain (Y-104).

Hope Tice, Shanmugam Mayilraj, David Sims, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Alex Copeland, Jan-Fang Cheng, Linda Meincke, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Galina Ovchinnikova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, John C Detter, Thomas Brettin, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Feng Chen.   

Abstract

Nakamurella multipartita (Yoshimi et al. 1996) Tao et al. 2004 is the type species of the monospecific genus Nakamurella in the actinobacterial suborder Frankineae. The nonmotile, coccus-shaped strain was isolated from activated sludge acclimated with sugar-containing synthetic wastewater, and is capable of accumulating large amounts of polysaccharides in its cells. Here we describe the features of the organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the family Nakamurellaceae. The 6,060,298 bp long single replicon genome with its 5415 protein-coding and 56 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frankineae; GEBA; Gram-positive; MK-8 (H4); nonmotile; polysaccharide-accumulating; septa-forming; ‘Microsphaeraceae’

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304699      PMCID: PMC3035273          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.721316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain Y-104T [1] (DSM 44233 = ATCC 700099 = JCM 9533) is the type strain of the species Nakamurella multipartita, which is the sole member and type species of the genus Nakamurella [2], the type genus of the family Nacamurellaceae [2]. N. multipartita was first described in 1996 by Yoshimi et al. as polysaccharide-accumulating ‘Microsphaera multipartita’ and type species of the genus ‘Microsphaera’ [1]. Unfortunately, Yoshimi et al. [1] overlooked the priority of the named fungal genus Microsphaera described 145 years earlier [3]. Principle 1(2) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision) recommends avoiding the use of names which might cause confusion and therefore grants priority of the fungal genus Microsphaera in the family Erysiphaceae [4], Stackebrandt et al. maintained the illegitimate name when creating the likewise illegitimate family ‘Microsphaeraceae’ in 1997 [5]. In 2004 Tao et al. replaced the illegitimate genus and family names with the legitimate and validly published names Nakamurella and Nakamurellaceae, respectively, in honor of the Japanese microbiologist Kazonuri Nakamura, who also discovered strain Y-104T [2]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for N. multipartita strain Y-104T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features of organism

The environmental diversity of the members of the species N. multipartita appears to be limited. Only one 16S rRNA gene sequence from a Finish indoor isolate (BF0001B070, 96.2% sequence identity) is reported in Genbank [6], as well as two Finish indoor phylotypes (FM872655, 98.2%; FM873571, 96.2%) by Taubel et al., and a phylotype from fresh water sediment of the high altitude Andean Altiplano (northern Chile) with 96.6% sequence identity (EF632902). None of the sequences generated from large scale environmental samplings and genome surveys surpassed 93% sequence identity and were thereby significantly less similar to strain Y-104T than the closest related type strain, DS-52 T of Humicoccus flavidus (95.9%) [7] (status November 2009). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of N. multipartita strain Y-104T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies differ by one nucleotide (C-homopolymer close to 3’-end) from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from JCM 9543 (Y08541).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of N. multipartita Y-104T relative to the other type strains within the Frankineae. The tree was inferred from 1362 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and rooted with the type strain of the order. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [11] such as the GEBA organism Geodermatophilus obscurus [12] are shown in blue. Important non-type strains are shown in green [13], and published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of N. multipartita Y-104T relative to the other type strains within the Frankineae. The tree was inferred from 1362 aligned characters [8,9] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [10] and rooted with the type strain of the order. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [11] such as the GEBA organism Geodermatophilus obscurus [12] are shown in blue. Important non-type strains are shown in green [13], and published genomes in bold. N. multipartita strain Y-104T is aerobic and chemoorganotrophic. Cells are non-motile, non-spore forming, Gram-positive (Table 1) and coccus-shaped [1]. The cells are 0.8 to 3.0 µm in diameter; depending on the growth stage. They occur as singles, in pairs or in small irregular clusters (Figure 2). A rod-coccus cycle was not observed at any stage of the growth. Strain Y-104T has a characteristic cell division in which a cell wall-like structure occurs in the middle of each cell during their early growth phase. Such structures, also called septa, were frequently observed during the late log phase of the growth cycle [1]. The doubling time was reported to be approximately 11 hours in a liquid medium at pH 7.0 and at 25°C [1]. Colonies on agar plates are circular, smooth, convex and white at the early stage of growth and cream-colored at later stage of growth. The polysaccharide content of the cells is very high, sometimes more than 50% (wt/wt) depending on the culture conditions.
Table 1

Classification and general features of N. multipartita strain Y-104T according to the MIGS recommendations [14]

MIGS ID  Property   Term  Evidence code
  Current classification   Domain Bacteria   Phylum Actinobacteria   Class Actinobacteria   Order Actinomycetales   Suborder Frankineae   Family Nakamurellaceae   Genus Nakamurella   Species Nakamurella multipartita   Type strain Y-104  TAS [15]  TAS [16]  TAS [5]  TAS [5]  TAS [2]  TAS [2]  TAS [2]  TAS [2]  TAS [1]
  Gram stain   positive  TAS [1]
  Cell shape   coccus  TAS [1]
  Motility   non-motile  TAS [1]
  Sporulation   non-sporulating  TAS [1]
  Temperature range   10-35°C  TAS [1]
  Optimum temperature   25°C  TAS [1]
  Salinity   up to 6g NaCl/L  TAS [1]
MIGS-22  Oxygen requirement   aerobic chemoorganotroph  TAS [1]
  Carbon source   sugars, alcohols, glucose, maltose,   mannose, fructose, starch  TAS [1]
  Energy source   starch, ethanol, propanol  TAS [1]
MIGS-6  Habitat   activated sludge cultured in fed-batch reactors  TAS [1]
MIGS-15  Biotic relationship   free-living  NAS
MIGS-14  Pathogenicity   none  NAS
  Biosafety level   1  TAS [17]
  Isolation   activated sludge  TAS [1]
MIGS-4  Geographic location   not reported
MIGS-5  Sample collection time   not reported
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2  Latitude  Longitude   not reported
MIGS-4.3  Depth   not reported
MIGS-4.4  Altitude   not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [18]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors, or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of N. multipartita strain Y-104T

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [18]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors, or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements. Scanning electron micrograph of N. multipartita strain Y-104T Growth of strain Y-104T occurs at a temperature range of 10-35˚C and a pH range of 5.0 to 9.0 and in the presence of up to 6% NaCl. N. multipartita is positive for catalase production and negative for oxidase activity [1]. It is capable of utilizing glucose, fructose, mannose, galactose, xylose, sucrose, maltose, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol, ethanol, propanol, glycerol, starch, pyruvate, aranine, glutamate, glutamine and histidine as carbon and energy sources [1]. The strain cannot utilize acetate, malate, succinate, arginine, asparagine, methanol or glycogen as carbon and energy sources [1]. Strain Y-104T is able to accumulate large amounts of polysaccharides in its cells [1].

Chemotaxonomy

The murein of N. multipartita strain Y-104T contains meso-diaminopimelic acid as the diagnostic diamino acid [1]. The fatty acid pattern of Y-104T is dominated by iso-C16:0 (19.7%), iso-C15:0 (15.7%) and C18:1 (14.0%) and substantial amounts of C16:0 (10.3%), anteiso-C15:0 (9.2%), iso-C17:0 (8.5%) and anteiso-C17:0 (5.2%) were detected [1]. The predominant menaquinones are MK-8 (H4), approximately 97.0%, and minor amounts of MK-7 (H4), MK-8 (H2) and MK-9 (H4) were present [1]. Mycolic acids are absent [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of each phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [14] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID    Property   Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality   Finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used   Two Sanger genomic libraries: 8kb   pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms   ABI3730
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage   15.4× Sanger
MIGS-30    Assemblers   Arachne, phrap
MIGS-32    Gene calling method   Prodigal, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID   CP001737
    Genbank Date of Release   September 18, 2009
    GOLD ID   Gi02230
    NCBI project ID   29537
    Database: IMG-GEBA   2501939634
MIGS-13    Source material identifier   DSM 44233
    Project relevance   Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

N. multipartita Y-104T, DSM 44233, was grown in DSMZ 553 medium [19] at 28°C. DNA was isolated from 1-1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions with modification st/FT for cell lysis according to Wu et al. [20].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using Sanger sequencing platform. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found on the JGI website. Optimal raft assembly was produced using Arachne assembler. Finishing assemblies were made using the parallel phrap assembler (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [21] or transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification. A total of 2,596 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all Sanger reads provided 15.4× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 118,931 Sanger reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [22] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePrimp pipeline [23]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [24].

Genome properties

The genome is 6,060,298 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with a 70.9% G+C content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 5,471 genes predicted, 5,415 were protein coding genes, and 56 RNAs; 175 pseudo genes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (66.5%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute  Value  % of Total
Genome size (bp)  6,060,298  100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)  5,526,464  91.19%
DNA G+C content (bp)  4,297,749  70.92%
Number of replicons  1
Extrachromosomal elements  0
Total genes  5,471  100.00%
RNA genes  56  1.02%
rRNA operons  2
Protein-coding genes  5,415  98.98%
Pseudo genes  175  3.20%
Genes with function prediction  3,638  66.50%
Genes in paralog clusters  3,319  60.67%
Genes assigned to COGs  3,673  67.14%
Genes assigned Pfam domains  4,054  74.10%
Genes with signal peptides  1,713  31.31%
Genes with transmembrane helices  1,258  22.99%
CRISPR repeats  9
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   Value  %age   Description
J   160  3.9   Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   2  0.0   RNA processing and modification
K   400  9.7   Transcription
L   324  7.8   Replication, recombination and repair
D   31  0.8   Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
V   81  2.0   Defense mechanisms
T   238  5.8   Signal transduction mechanisms
M   173  4.2   Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
Z   1  0.0   Cytoskeleton
U   44  1.1   Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O   113  2.7   Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   308  7.5   Energy production and conversion
G   341  8.3   Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   334  8.1   Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   97  2.4   Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   190  4.6   Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   160  3.9   Lipid transport and metabolism
P   182  4.4   Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   117  2.8   Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   506  12.2   General function prediction only
S   330  8.0   Function unknown
-   1773  32.4   Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  17 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Humicoccus flavidus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Yoon; So-Jung Kang; Seo-Youn Jung; Tae-Kwang Oh
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification.

Authors:  Doug Hyatt; Gwo-Liang Chen; Philip F Locascio; Miriam L Land; Frank W Larimer; Loren J Hauser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Proposal of Nakamurella gen. nov. as a substitute for the bacterial genus Microsphaera Yoshimi et al. 1996 and Nakamurellaceae fam. nov. as a substitute for the illegitimate bacterial family Microsphaeraceae Rainey et al. 1997.

Authors:  Tian-Shen Tao; Ying-Yu Yue; Wen-Xin Chen; Wen-Feng Chen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Complete genome sequence of Geodermatophilus obscurus type strain (G-20).

Authors:  Natalia Ivanova; Johannes Sikorski; Marlen Jando; Christine Munk; Alla Lapidus; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Alex Copeland; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Feng Chen; Matt Nolan; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Linda Meincke; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-03-30

10.  Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment.

Authors:  Helena Rintala; Miia Pitkäranta; Mika Toivola; Lars Paulin; Aino Nevalainen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery.

Authors:  Richard H Baltz
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Changes in bacterial diversity of activated sludge exposed to titanium dioxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Pabel Cervantes-Avilés; César Augusto Caretta; Elcia Margareth Souza Brito; Pierre Bertin; Germán Cuevas-Rodríguez; Robert Duran
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Efficiency of sulfamethoxazole removal from wastewater using aerobic granular sludge: influence of environmental factors.

Authors:  Di Cui; Zeyi Chen; Ximing Cheng; Guochen Zheng; Yuan Sun; Hongna Deng; Wenlan Li
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Complete genome sequence of Geodermatophilus obscurus type strain (G-20).

Authors:  Natalia Ivanova; Johannes Sikorski; Marlen Jando; Christine Munk; Alla Lapidus; Tijana Glavina Del Rio; Alex Copeland; Hope Tice; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Feng Chen; Matt Nolan; David Bruce; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Linda Meincke; Thomas Brettin; John C Detter; Manfred Rohde; Markus Göker; Jim Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2010-03-30

6.  Candidatus Frankia Datiscae Dg1, the Actinobacterial Microsymbiont of Datisca glomerata, Expresses the Canonical nod Genes nodABC in Symbiosis with Its Host Plant.

Authors:  Tomas Persson; Kai Battenberg; Irina V Demina; Theoden Vigil-Stenman; Brian Vanden Heuvel; Petar Pujic; Marc T Facciotti; Elizabeth G Wilbanks; Anna O'Brien; Pascale Fournier; Maria Antonia Cruz Hernandez; Alberto Mendoza Herrera; Claudine Médigue; Philippe Normand; Katharina Pawlowski; Alison M Berry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bioinformatics analysis of bacterial annexins--putative ancestral relatives of eukaryotic annexins.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar Kodavali; Małgorzata Dudkiewicz; Sławomir Pikuła; Krzysztof Pawłowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  High quality draft genome of Nakamurella lactea type strain, a rock actinobacterium, and emended description of Nakamurella lactea.

Authors:  Imen Nouioui; Markus Göker; Lorena Carro; Maria Del Carmen Montero-Calasanz; Manfred Rohde; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2017-01-06

9.  Changes in Actinomycetes community structure under the influence of Bt transgenic brinjal crop in a tropical agroecosystem.

Authors:  Amit Kishore Singh; Major Singh; Suresh Kumar Dubey
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Keys to eukaryality: planctomycetes and ancestral evolution of cellular complexity.

Authors:  John A Fuerst; Evgeny Sagulenko
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.