| Literature DB >> 21304693 |
Markus Göker, Brittany Held, Alla Lapidus, Matt Nolan, Stefan Spring, Montri Yasawong, Susan Lucas, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Lynne Goodwin, Roxanne Tapia, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Evelyne Brambilla, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Thomas Brettin, John C Detter, Cliff Han, Manfred Rohde, Johannes Sikorski, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk.
Abstract
Ignisphaera aggregans Niederberger et al. 2006 is the type and sole species of genus Ignisphaera. This archaeal species is characterized by a coccoid-shape and is strictly anaerobic, moderately acidophilic, heterotrophic hyperthermophilic and fermentative. The type strain AQ1.S1(T) was isolated from a near neutral, boiling spring in Kuirau Park, Rotorua, New Zealand. This is the first completed genome sequence of the genus Ignisphaera and the fifth genome (fourth type strain) sequence in the family Desulfurococcaceae. The 1,875,953 bp long genome with its 2,009 protein-coding and 52 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.Entities:
Keywords: Crenarchaeota; Desulfurococcaceae; GEBA; cocci-shaped; fermentative; hot spring; hyperthermophile; moderately acidophilic; obligately anaerobic
Year: 2010 PMID: 21304693 PMCID: PMC3035270 DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1072907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Classification and general features of I. aggregans AQ1.S1T according to the MIGS recommendations [7]
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum | TAS [ | ||
| Class | TAS [ | ||
| Order | TAS [ | ||
| Family | TAS [ | ||
| Genus | TAS [ | ||
| Species | TAS [ | ||
| Type strain AQ1.S1 | TAS [ | ||
| Gram stain | not reported | ||
| Cell shape | regular or irregular cocci that occur singly, | TAS [ | |
| Motility | none | NAS | |
| Sporulation | not reported | ||
| Temperature range | 85°C–98°C | TAS [ | |
| Optimum temperature | 92-95°C | TAS [ | |
| Salinity | < 0.5% NaCl | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | obligate anaerobic | TAS [ |
| Carbon source | starch, trypticase, peptone, lactose, glucose, | TAS [ | |
| Energy source | carbohydrates, amino acids | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | boiling spring | TAS [ |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | free-living | TAS [ |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | none | TAS [ |
| Biosafety level | 1 | TAS [ | |
| Isolation | pool water | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Kuirau Park, Rotorau, New Zealand | TAS [ |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection time | 2002 | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.1 | Latitude | 176.24 | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.2 | Longitude | -38.13 | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.3 | Depth | ≤ 2 m | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | 268 m | NAS |
Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [15]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.
Figure 1Scanning electron micrograph of I. aggregans AQ1.S1T
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of I. aggregans AQ1.S1T relative to the type strains of the other genera within the order Desulfurococcales. The tree was inferred from 1,329 aligned characters [17,18] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [19] and rooted with the type strains of the genera of the neighboring order Acidilobales. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 250 bootstrap replicates [20] ,if greater than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [21] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold ([22-25], CP000504 and CP000852).
Genome sequencing project information
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS-31 | Finishing quality | Finished |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library, |
| MIGS-29 | Sequencing platforms | 454 Titanium; Illumina GAii |
| MIGS-31.2 | Sequencing coverage | 94.5× pyrosequence and Illumina |
| MIGS-30 | Assemblers | Newbler version 2.0.00.20- |
| MIGS-32 | Gene calling method | Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP |
| INSDC ID | CP002098 | |
| Genbank Date of Release | August 24, 2010 | |
| GOLD ID | Gc01330 | |
| NCBI project ID | 33361 | |
| Database: IMG-GEBA | 2502171146 | |
| MIGS-13 | Source material identifier | DSM 17230 |
| Project relevance | Tree of Life, GEBA |
Genome Statistics
| | ||
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 1,875,953 | 100.00% |
| DNA coding region (bp) | 1,623,145 | 86.52% |
| DNA G+C content (bp) | 669,463 | 35.69% |
| Number of replicons | 1 | |
| Extrachromosomal elements | 0 | |
| Total genes | 2,061 | 100.00% |
| RNA genes | 52 | 2.52% |
| rRNA operons | 1 | |
| Protein-coding genes | 2,009 | 97.48% |
| Pseudo genes | 79 | 3.83% |
| Genes with function prediction | 1,158 | 56.19% |
| Genes in paralog clusters | 190 | 9.22% |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 1,220 | 59.19% |
| Genes assigned Pfam domains | 1,280 | 62.11% |
| Genes with signal peptides | 147 | 7.13% |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 454 | 22.03% |
| CRISPR repeats | 9 |
Figure 3Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 158 | 11.9 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| A | 2 | 0.2 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 64 | 4.8 | Transcription |
| L | 70 | 5.3 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 2 | 0.2 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 9 | 0.7 | Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| Y | 0 | 0.0 | Nuclear structure |
| V | 22 | 1.7 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 23 | 1.7 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 31 | 2.3 | Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis |
| N | 11 | 0.8 | Cell motility |
| Z | 0 | 0.0 | Cytoskeleton |
| W | 0 | 0.0 | Extracellular structures |
| U | 16 | 1.2 | Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport |
| O | 56 | 4.2 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 82 | 6.2 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 80 | 6.0 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 135 | 10.2 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 46 | 3.5 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 64 | 4.8 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 13 | 1.0 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 89 | 6.7 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 4 | 0.3 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 209 | 15.8 | General function prediction only |
| S | 140 | 10.6 | Function unknown |
| - | 841 | 40.8 | Not in COGs |
Figure 4Phylogenetic network inferred from whole-genome (GBDP) distances, showing the relationships between Desulfurococcaceae (Aeropyrum, Ignisphaera, Staphylothermus and Thermosphaera), Pyrodictiaceae (Hyperthermus and Pyrolobus), Thermoproteaceae (Caldivirga, Pyrobaculum, Thermoproteus and Vulcanisaeta) and Thermofilaceae (Thermofilum).