Literature DB >> 21304672

Complete genome sequence of Xylanimonas cellulosilytica type strain (XIL07).

Brian Foster, Rüdiger Pukall, Birte Abt, Matt Nolan, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Feng Chen, Susan Lucas, Hope Tice, Sam Pitluck, Jan-Fang Cheng, Olga Chertkov, Thomas Brettin, Cliff Han, John C Detter, David Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Amrita Pati, Natalia Mikhailova, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Patrick Chain, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Jim Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Alla Lapidus.   

Abstract

Xylanimonas cellulosilytica Rivas et al. 2003 is the type species of the genus Xylanimonas of the actinobacterial family Promicromonosporaceae. The species X. cellulosilytica is of interest because of its ability to hydrolyze cellulose and xylan. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of a member of the large family Promicromonosporaceae, and the 3,831,380 bp long genome (one chromosome plus an 88,604 bp long plasmid) with its 3485 protein-coding and 61 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic; GEBA; Gram-positive; Promicromonosporaceae; cellulases; non-motile; xylanases

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304672      PMCID: PMC3035249          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.571102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain XIL07T (= DSM 15894 = CECT 5975 = JCM 12276) is the type strain of the species Xylanimonas cellulosilytica and was first described in 2003 by Rivas et al. [1]. It was isolated from a decayed tree, Ulmus nigra, in Salamanca, Spain. X. cellulosilytica is of high interest because it produces a set of hydrolytic enzymes, cellulases and xylanases that enable the organism to hydrolyze cellulose and xylan. Cellulolytic enzymes from microorganisms have many biotechnological and industrial applications, for example in the food, detergent, paper and textile industries or in the production of biofuels. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for X. cellulosilytica XIL07T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

The most closely related 16S rRNA gene sequences from cultivated strains that are stored in Genbank originate from isolates classified into neighboring genera within the Promicromonosporaceae. Among them are some Isoptericola species isolated from different habitats, including soil, tufa, decayed wood and the hindgut of the humus-feeding larva of the beetle Pachnoda ephippiata. Sequences of 16S rRNAs from several uncultivated bacteria detected in midgut and hindgut of P. ephippiata (AJ576375, AJ576390, AJ576391 AJ576404, AJ576378, AJ576417) [2] are apparently the most closely related phylotypes, with 96-97% sequence similarity. Environmental samples from metagenomic surveys do not surpass 92% sequence similarity, indicating that members of the species are not heavily represented in the so far genomically screened habitats (status July 2009). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of X. cellulosilytica XIL07T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three copies of the 16S rRNA gene in the genome differ by up to four nucleotides, and differ by up to five nucleotides from the previously published sequence generated from DSM 15894 (AF403541).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of X. cellulosilytica XIL07T relative to the other type strains within the family Promicromonosporaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,393 aligned characters [3,4] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [5] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [6] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of X. cellulosilytica XIL07T relative to the other type strains within the family Promicromonosporaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,393 aligned characters [3,4] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [5] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [6] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold. Based on thin section EMs, cells of strain XIL07T were described as coccoid (approximately 1.1 x 0.8 µm) that occur singly [1]. However, SEM images (Figure 2) show coccobacillary forms and short rods, as known from other members of the Promicromonosporaceae: Cellulosimicrobium, Isoptericola and Promicromonospora (Table 1). Strain XIL07T is Gram-positive, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, nonmotile and non-spore-forming. Colonies grown on YED are white-to-cream colored and their morphology is circular, smooth and mostly flat. Strain XIL07T utilizes L-arabinose, carboxymethylcellulose, mannose, maltose, rhamnose, starch and xylan as sole carbon source, and produces acid from amygdalin, L-arabinose, arbutin, cellobiose, fructose, galactose, getobiose, glucose, glycerol, glycogen, lactose, lyxose, maltose, mannose, melozitose, rhamnose, salicin, sucrose, trehalose, turanose and D-xylose. No growth was observed with acetate, citrate, gluconate, inositol, malate or mannitol as carbon sources. Strain XIL07T actively produces amylases, cellulases, gelatinase, xylanases and β-galactosidase and shows weak catalase activity. Esculin was hydrolyzed and nitrate was not reduced [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of X. cellulosilytica XIL07T

Table 1

Classification and general features of X. cellulosilytica XIL07T according to the MIGS recommendations [7]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence code
ClassificationDomain BacteriaTAS [8]
Phylum ActinobacteriaTAS [9]
Class ActinobacteriaTAS [10]
Subclass ActinobacteridaeTAS [10]
Order ActinomycetalesTAS [10]
Suborder MicrococcineaeTAS [10]
Family PromicromonosporaceaeTAS [10]
Genus XylanimonasTAS [1]
Species Xylanimonas cellulosilyticaTAS [1]
Type strain XIL07
Gram stainpositiveTAS [1]
Cell shapecoccoid, short rodsTAS [1] & IDA
MotilitynonmotileTAS [1]
SporulationnonsporulatingTAS [1]
Temperature rangemesophileTAS [1]
Optimum temperature30 °CTAS [1]
Salinitynot reported
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementaerobic or facultatively anaerobicTAS [1]
Carbon sourceL-arabinose, carboxymethylcellulose, mannose,maltose, rhamnose, starch and xylanTAS [1]
Energy sourcechemoorganotrophTAS [1]
MIGS-6HabitatsoilTAS [1]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree livingNAS
MIGS-14Pathogenicitynon pathogenicNAS
Biosafety level1TAS [11]
Isolationdecaying treeTAS [1]
MIGS-4Geographic locationSalamanca, SpainTAS [1]
MIGS-5Sample collection timenot reported
MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2Latitude, Longitude40.965, -5.663NAS
MIGS-4.3Depthnot reported
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [12]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Scanning electron micrograph of X. cellulosilytica XIL07T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [12]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a living isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

The cell wall of X. cellulosilytica XIL07T contains A4α-type peptidoglycan (L-Lys-D-Asp). Cell wall sugars are galactose and rhamnose. Mycolic acids are absent. Strain XIL07T contains menaquinone MK-9(H4) as the major respiratory lipoquinone and a lower amount of MK-8(H4). The cellular fatty acid pattern is composed of iso- and anteiso-branched fatty acids with anteiso-C15:0 (12-methyl tetradecanoic acid) being the predominant and iso-C15:0 the minor fatty acid. The major polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol mannosides and other unidentified phosphoglycolipids [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [13]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [6] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property     Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used     One Sanger libraries 8 kb pMCL200     and one 454 Pyrosequencing     standard library
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms     ABI3730, 454 GS FLX
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage     9.2× Sanger, 26.9× Pyrosequencing
MIGS-30     Assemblers     Newbler, Arachne
MIGS-32     Gene calling method     Prodigal, GenePRIMP
     GenBank ID     CP001821 (chromosome), CP001822 (plasmid)
     GenBank Date of Release     November 20, 2009
     GOLD ID     Gc01153
     NCBI project ID     19715
     Database: IMG-GEBA     2501651194
MIGS-13     Source material identifier     DSM 15894
     Project relevance     Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

X. cellulosilytica XIL07T, DSM 15894, was grown in DSMZ medium 92 (Trypticase Soy Yeast Extract Medium) at 28°C [14]. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol without modifications.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at http://www.jgi.doe.gov/. 454 Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 4,321 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and to adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using Arachne assembler. Possible mis-assemblies were corrected and gaps between contigs were closed by custom primer walks from sub-clones or PCR products. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification. A total of 437 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together all sequence types provided 36.1× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 52,128 Sanger and 514,866 Pyrosequencing reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [15] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [16]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [17].

Genome properties

The genome is 3,831,380 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome and one plasmid with a 72.5% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,546 genes predicted, 3,485 were protein coding genes, and 61 RNAs. In addition, 42 pseudogenes were identified. The majority of the genes (68.4%) were assigned with a putative function while those remaining were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)3,831,380100%
DNA coding region (bp)3,531,10292.16%
DNA G+C content (bp)2,775,91372.45%
Number of replicons2
Extrachromosomal elements1
Total genes3,546100.00%
RNA genes611.72%
rRNA operons3
Protein-coding genes3,48598.28%
Pseudo genes421.18%
Genes with function prediction2,42668.42%
Genes in paralog clusters41111.59%
Genes assigned to COGs2,40367.77%
Genes assigned Pfam domains2,49070.22%
Genes with signal peptides86424.37%
Genes with transmembrane helices92526.09%
CRISPR repeats1
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

CodeValue%age  Description
J1554.4  Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A10.0  RNA processing and modification
K2437.0  Transcription
L1373.9  Replication, recombination and repair
B10.0  Chromatin structure and dynamics
D250.7  Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.0  Nuclear structure
V852.4  Defense mechanisms
T1183.4  Signal transduction mechanisms
M1313.8  Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N60.2  Cell motility
Z00.0  Cytoskeleton
W00.0  Extracellular structures
U391.1  Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O772.2  Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1534.4  Energy production and conversion
G2948.4  Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2146.1  Amino acid transport and metabolism
F792.3  Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1103.2  Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I732.1  Lipid transport and metabolism
P1524.4  Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q300.9  Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R3189.1  General function prediction only
S2005.7  Function unknown
-108231.0  Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  12 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis; Paul Hoover; Jacques Rougemont
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia N Ivanova; I-Min A Chen; Ken Chu; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Microbial community structure in midgut and hindgut of the humus-feeding larva of Pachnoda ephippiata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).

Authors:  Markus Egert; Bianca Wagner; Thorsten Lemke; Andreas Brune; Michael W Friedrich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Xylanimonas cellulosilytica gen. nov., sp. nov., a xylanolytic bacterium isolated from a decayed tree (Ulmus nigra).

Authors:  Raúl Rivas; Manuel Sánchez; Martha E Trujillo; José Luis Zurdo-Piñeiro; Pedro F Mateos; Eustoquis Martínez-Molina; Encarna Velázquez
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea.

Authors:  Dongying Wu; Philip Hugenholtz; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Rüdiger Pukall; Eileen Dalin; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor Kunin; Lynne Goodwin; Martin Wu; Brian J Tindall; Sean D Hooper; Amrita Pati; Athanasios Lykidis; Stefan Spring; Iain J Anderson; Patrik D'haeseleer; Adam Zemla; Mitchell Singer; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Alex Copeland; Cliff Han; Feng Chen; Jan-Fang Cheng; Susan Lucas; Cheryl Kerfeld; Elke Lang; Sabine Gronow; Patrick Chain; David Bruce; Edward M Rubin; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Genomics of aerobic cellulose utilization systems in actinobacteria.

Authors:  Iain Anderson; Birte Abt; Athanasios Lykidis; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos Kyrpides; Natalia Ivanova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.