INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death with poor survival due to the late stage at which lung cancer is typically diagnosed. Given the clinical burden from lung cancer and the relatively favorable survival associated with early-stage lung cancer, biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer are of important potential clinical benefit. METHODS: We performed a global lung cancer serum biomarker discovery study using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a set of pooled non-small cell lung cancer case sera and matched controls. Immunoaffinity subtraction was used to deplete the top most abundant serum proteins; the remaining serum proteins were subjected to trypsin digestion and analyzed in triplicate by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The tandem mass spectrum data were searched against the human proteome database, and the resultant spectral counting data were used to estimate the relative abundance of proteins across the case/control serum pools. The spectral counting-derived abundances of some candidate biomarker proteins were confirmed with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assays. RESULTS: A list of 49 differentially abundant candidate proteins was compiled by applying a negative binomial regression model to the spectral counting data (p < 0.01). Functional analysis with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tools showed significant enrichment of inflammatory response proteins, key molecules in cell-cell signaling and interaction network, and differential physiological responses for the two common non-small cell lung cancer subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a set of candidate serum biomarkers with statistically significant differential abundance across the lung cancer case/control pools, which, when validated, could improve lung cancer early detection.
INTRODUCTION:Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death with poor survival due to the late stage at which lung cancer is typically diagnosed. Given the clinical burden from lung cancer and the relatively favorable survival associated with early-stage lung cancer, biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer are of important potential clinical benefit. METHODS: We performed a global lung cancer serum biomarker discovery study using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a set of pooled non-small cell lung cancer case sera and matched controls. Immunoaffinity subtraction was used to deplete the top most abundant serum proteins; the remaining serum proteins were subjected to trypsin digestion and analyzed in triplicate by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The tandem mass spectrum data were searched against the human proteome database, and the resultant spectral counting data were used to estimate the relative abundance of proteins across the case/control serum pools. The spectral counting-derived abundances of some candidate biomarker proteins were confirmed with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry assays. RESULTS: A list of 49 differentially abundant candidate proteins was compiled by applying a negative binomial regression model to the spectral counting data (p < 0.01). Functional analysis with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis tools showed significant enrichment of inflammatory response proteins, key molecules in cell-cell signaling and interaction network, and differential physiological responses for the two common non-small cell lung cancer subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a set of candidate serum biomarkers with statistically significant differential abundance across the lung cancer case/control pools, which, when validated, could improve lung cancer early detection.
Authors: William M Old; Karen Meyer-Arendt; Lauren Aveline-Wolf; Kevin G Pierce; Alex Mendoza; Joel R Sevinsky; Katheryn A Resing; Natalie G Ahn Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: M Rapellino; J Niklinski; F Pecchio; M Furman; S Baldi; L Chyczewski; E Ruffini; E Chyczewska Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Jun Hou; Joachim Aerts; Bianca den Hamer; Wilfred van Ijcken; Michael den Bakker; Peter Riegman; Cor van der Leest; Peter van der Spek; John A Foekens; Henk C Hoogsteden; Frank Grosveld; Sjaak Philipsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Fangtian Huang; Xuemei Zeng; Woong Kim; Manimalha Balasubramani; Arola Fortian; Steven P Gygi; Nathan A Yates; Alexander Sorkin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Takefumi Kikuchi; Mohamed Hassanein; Joseph M Amann; Qinfeng Liu; Robbert J C Slebos; S M Jamshedur Rahman; Jacob M Kaufman; Xueqiong Zhang; Megan D Hoeksema; Bradford K Harris; Ming Li; Yu Shyr; Adriana L Gonzalez; Lisa J Zimmerman; Daniel C Liebler; Pierre P Massion; David P Carbone Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Charles E Birse; Robert J Lagier; William FitzHugh; Harvey I Pass; William N Rom; Eric S Edell; Aaron O Bungum; Fabien Maldonado; James R Jett; Mehdi Mesri; Erin Sult; Elizabeth Joseloff; Aiqun Li; Jenny Heidbrink; Gulshan Dhariwal; Chad Danis; Jennifer L Tomic; Robert J Bruce; Paul A Moore; Tao He; Marcia E Lewis; Steve M Ruben Journal: Clin Proteomics Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 3.988
Authors: Simona Viglio; Jan Stolk; Paolo Iadarola; Serena Giuliano; Maurizio Luisetti; Roberta Salvini; Marco Fumagalli; Anna Bardoni Journal: Proteomes Date: 2014-01-22
Authors: Lia R Edmunds; Lokendra Sharma; Huabo Wang; Audry Kang; Sonia d'Souza; Jie Lu; Michael McLaughlin; James M Dolezal; Xiaoli Gao; Susan T Weintraub; Ying Ding; Xuemei Zeng; Nathan Yates; Edward V Prochownik Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240