Literature DB >> 21304173

Tumor reversion holds promise.

Adam Telerman1, Robert Amson, Mary J C Hendrix.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21304173      PMCID: PMC3248106          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.100803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
In the present issue of the journal, Makoto Noda and colleagues present a screening assay for anti-cancer drugs based on tumor reversion, identifying a series of hitherto unsuspected compounds that are of potential therapeutic interest. More specifically, the assay is based upon triggering the promoter of Reck, which functions as an inhibitor of metalloproteinases. Among the pharmaceutical agents that were able to activate the Reck promoter, 1/3 were known anti-cancer drugs which act through different cytopathic mechanisms. The second group comprises drugs that inhibit growth of bacteria, plasmodium falciparum, fungi and worms. The third category consists of “drugs related to the function of the central nervous system”. Now, here comes the interesting and original idea of the paper. Activation of Reck induces “flat revertants” and Noda used this system already to clone the K-rev gene [1,2]. Flat revertants have a history of their own that started when investigators in the early 1960s used the NIH3T3 cells to assay the transforming potential of oncoviruses and oncogenes. A couple of years later in 1968, when Robert Pollack stepped into the field, he made a remarkable observation. Some of the cells infected with SV40 or polyoma viruses no longer showed the typical oncogenic phenotype, but instead, acquired a flat morphology [3]. These cells had also lost their oncogenic potential and were therefore named “flat revertants”. This reversion of the malignant phenotype was in line with the experiments initiated by Askanazy in teratocarcinoma cells at the beginning of the 20th century and later expanded to different species and cell types [4]. The most spectacular tumor reversion experiments have been carried out in plants by Braun [4]. Various approaches, using different biological systems [5,6,7] led to the identification of at least 300 genes that could be implicated in the tumor reversion process, including siah1, PS1, TSAP6, TCTP, Integrin receptors, and Nodal. Interestingly, Nodal is an embryonic morphogen recently found to be a key plasticity gene in aggressive tumor cells. Down-regulation of Nodal in this plastic phenotype results in reversion to a lineage specific cell type and tumor suppression [8]. Targeting tumor reversion genes in order to induce a suppression of the malignant phenotype has already led to the identification of a series of anti-histaminic, neuroleptic and anti-depressive drugs that inhibit intra-cellular levels of TCTP, a key gene in tumor reversion [9]. Other genes such as PS1, a predisposition gene to familial Alzheimer’s disease targeted by gamma-secretase inhibitors are tested in Kaposi sarcoma patients [4]. Tumor reversion as used here in Noda’s study [10] can be a fast-track for the identification of new anti-cancer drugs when we are still far away from understanding how reversion functions at the molecular level, and this is a major future challenge.
  10 in total

1.  A ras-related gene with transformation suppressor activity.

Authors:  H Kitayama; Y Sugimoto; T Matsuzaki; Y Ikawa; M Noda
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-01-13       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Embryonic and tumorigenic pathways converge via Nodal signaling: role in melanoma aggressiveness.

Authors:  Jolanta M Topczewska; Lynne-Marie Postovit; Naira V Margaryan; Anthony Sam; Angela R Hess; William W Wheaton; Brian J Nickoloff; Jacek Topczewski; Mary J C Hendrix
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2006-07-30       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Detection of genes with a potential for suppressing the transformed phenotype associated with activated ras genes.

Authors:  M Noda; H Kitayama; T Matsuzaki; Y Sugimoto; H Okayama; R H Bassin; Y Ikawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Growth control in cultured cells: selection of sublines with increased sensitivity to contact inhibition and decreased tumor-producing ability.

Authors:  R E Pollack; H Green; G J Todaro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Reprogramming metastatic tumour cells with embryonic microenvironments.

Authors:  Mary J C Hendrix; Elisabeth A Seftor; Richard E B Seftor; Jennifer Kasemeier-Kulesa; Paul M Kulesa; Lynne-Marie Postovit
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Translationally controlled tumor protein is a target of tumor reversion.

Authors:  Marcel Tuynder; Giusy Fiucci; Sylvie Prieur; Alexandra Lespagnol; Anne Géant; Séverine Beaucourt; Dominique Duflaut; Stéphanie Besse; Laurent Susini; Jean Cavarelli; Dino Moras; Robert Amson; Adam Telerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The molecular programme of tumour reversion: the steps beyond malignant transformation.

Authors:  Adam Telerman; Robert Amson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  A model for tumor suppression using H-1 parvovirus.

Authors:  A Telerman; M Tuynder; T Dupressoir; B Robaye; F Sigaux; E Shaulian; M Oren; J Rommelaere; R Amson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A novel screen using the Reck tumor suppressor gene promoter detects both conventional and metastasis-suppressing anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Ryuya Murai; Yoko Yoshida; Teruyuki Muraguchi; Emi Nishimoto; Yoko Morioka; Hitoshi Kitayama; Shinae Kondoh; Yoshinori Kawazoe; Masahiro Hiraoka; Motonari Uesugi; Makoto Noda
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2010-08

10.  Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies.

Authors:  V M Weaver; O W Petersen; F Wang; C A Larabell; P Briand; C Damsky; M J Bissell
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-04-07       Impact factor: 10.539

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent progress in targeting cancer.

Authors:  Zoya N Demidenko; James A McCubrey
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.682

2.  Cancer reversion with oocyte extracts is mediated by cell cycle arrest and induction of tumour dormancy.

Authors:  Norazalina Saad; Ramiro Alberio; Andrew D Johnson; Richard D Emes; Tom C Giles; Philip Clarke; Anna M Grabowska; Cinzia Allegrucci
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-03-23

Review 3.  Mutation or not, what directly establishes a neoplastic state, namely cellular immortality and autonomy, still remains unknown and should be prioritized in our research.

Authors:  Shengming Zhu; Jiangang Wang; Lucas Zellmer; Ningzhi Xu; Mei Liu; Yun Hu; Hong Ma; Fei Deng; Wenxiu Yang; Dezhong Joshua Liao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.478

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.