Literature DB >> 21304093

Use of a screening tool improves appropriate referral to an electrophysiologist for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Laura M Gravelin1, Jennifer Yuhas, Michael Remetz, Martha Radford, John Foley, Rachel Lampert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite data showing the benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion for primary prevention in populations at risk for sudden death, professional society guidelines recommending primary prevention, and recognition by payers of the clinical value of ICDs in these populations, ICDs for primary prevention remain underused. We sought to determine whether implementing a screening tool would increase appropriate identification of patients showing clinical evidence of ICD benefit and prompt referral to an electrophysiologist for ICD implantation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Screening tools were affixed to medical records for patients seen in 2 outpatient cardiology offices that queried ejection fraction and whether referral to an electrophysiologist was made (N=6632). The number of appropriate referrals in the screening period were compared with analogous data collected before implementation of the screening tool (control period) through retrospective record review (n=3606). Significantly more eligible patients were offered referral during the screening period than during the control period at both sites, 80% (8/10 eligible) versus 33% (5/15) at site 1 (P<0.02) and 100% (44/44) versus 60% (21/35) at site 2 (P<0.001). Of all patients offered referral, 41% (32/78) accepted.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a screening tool increases referral to electrophysiology for patients in whom placement of an ICD confers the benefit of sudden cardiac death primary prevention. Barriers to referral include both physician and patient factors. Verification of these findings on a larger scale as well as studies defining the foundation of these barriers may further improve use of ICDs in patients for whom their mortality benefit is well described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21304093     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.956987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  5 in total

1.  Failure to reassess ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction in potential implantable cardioverter/defibrillator candidates: insights from the Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in acute Myocardial infarction Patients' Health Status (TRIUMPH) registry.

Authors:  Amy Leigh Miller; Kensey Gosch; Stacie L Daugherty; Saif Rathore; Pamela N Peterson; Eric D Peterson; P Michael Ho; Paul S Chan; David E Lanfear; John A Spertus; Tracy Y Wang
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Editorial Comment: Over, Under, or Just Right? How do we interpret ICD utilization in the modern era?

Authors:  Prakriti Gaba; Suraj Kapa; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 3.  Effectiveness of implementation interventions in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Deepti Shanbhag; Ian D Graham; Karen Harlos; R Brian Haynes; Itzhak Gabizon; Stuart J Connolly; Harriette Gillian Christine Van Spall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Evaluation of potential underuse of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Makoto Takano; Yui Nakayama; Hisao Matsuda; Tomoo Harada; Yoshihiro J Akashi
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-10-13

5.  A Population-Based Study of Device Eligibility, Use, and Reasons for Nonimplantation in Patients at Heart Function Clinics.

Authors:  Rochelle Bernier; Jessica Ng; Dat T Tran; Evan Lockwood; Lucy Reyes; Karen Cowan; Nowell M Fine; Justin Ezekowitz; Derek V Exner; Satish R Raj; Roopinder K Sandhu
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2019-06-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.