Literature DB >> 21303811

A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.

Wasundhara A Bhad1, Subash Nayak, Umal H Doshi.   

Abstract

In orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, an accurate antero-posterior measurement of jaw relationships is critically important. Previously described angular and linear measurements can be inaccurate because of their dependency on various factors. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new cephalometric measurement, named the W angle, to assess the sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible with accuracy and reproducibility. This angle uses three skeletal landmarks--point S, point M, and point G--to measure an angle that indicates the severity and the type of skeletal dysplasia in the sagittal dimension. One hundred and forty-two pre-treatment cephalometric radiographs of patients between the age of 15 and 25 years were selected. They were again subdivided into Classes I, II, and III groups on the basis of Beta angle, Wits appraisal, and ANB angle. The W angle was measured between the perpendicular from point M on S-G line and the M-G line. The mean and the standard deviation for the W angle were calculated. After using the one-way analysis of variance and the Newman-Keuls test, receiver operating characteristics curves were obtained. Results showed that a patient with a W angle between 51 and 56 degrees can be considered to have a Class I skeletal pattern. With an angle less than 51 degrees, patients are considered to have a skeletal Class II relationship and with an angle greater than 56 degrees, patients have a skeletal Class III relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21303811     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  P Aparna; Dilip N Kumar; Mandav Prasad; Naveen Shamnur; Arun Kumar G; Sridhar K R; Gopal Krishna B R; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns.

Authors:  Shobha Sundareswaran; Vinay Kumar
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

3.  Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perinetti; Michele Ceschi; Alessandro Scalia; Luca Contardo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.

Authors:  Maheen Ahmed; Attiya Shaikh; Mubassar Fida
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

5.  Sagittal discrepancies of the jaw in a Bangladeshi cohort: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Mushrath Islam; Ayman Hameed Uraibi; Arkan Al Azzawi; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Asilah Yusof
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  A Digital Cephalometric Study on The Morphometric Evaluation of Soft Palate in Oral Submucous Fibrosis.

Authors:  Manaswita Tripathy; Jayaprasad Anekar; Raj Ac; Sandeepa N C; Deepika Napplli; Priya Lokanath; Abdulrahman Nahi Alharbi; Fahad Mohammed A Alsobil; Darshan Devang Divakar; Aftab Ahmed Khan; Chitra Jhugroo; Sanjeev Balappa Khanagar; Sachin Naik
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-07-01

7.  Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.

Authors:  Rahul Trivedi; Amit Bhattacharya; Falguni Mehta; Dolly Patel; Harshik Parekh; Vaibhav Gandhi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  The morphology and bridging of the sella turcica in adult orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Gunjan Kumar Shrestha; Prabhat Ranjan Pokharel; Rajesh Gyawali; Bhushan Bhattarai; Jamal Giri
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Comparison of popular sagittal cephalometric analyses for validity and reliability.

Authors:  Irfan Qamaruddin; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Fazal Shahid; Sadaf Tanveer; Marvee Umer; Erum Amin
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-10-28

10.  Tau Angle: A New Approach for Assessment of True Sagittal Maxillomandibular Relationship.

Authors:  Prateek Gupta; Navneet Singh; Tulika Tripathi; Ram Gopal; Priyank Rai
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.