Literature DB >> 21303639

Evaluation of dexterity in insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Julia Pfützner1, Juliane Hellhammer, Petra Musholt, Anke H Pfützner, Jan Böhnke, Hero Torsten, Ildiko Amann-Zalan, Manfred Ganz, Thomas Forst, Andreas Pfützner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Daily routine for insulin-treated patients with diabetes mellitus requires correct performance of self-monitoring of blood glucose and insulin injections several times a day. Dexterity skills may play an important role in the performance efficacy of these procedures.
METHODS: We collected data of insulin-treated (>10 years) patients with different age ranges [healthy controls, 14 female/11 male, age (mean ± standard deviation) 55 ± 7 years; type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients, 12/13, 45 ± 9 years, disease duration 23.9 ± 6.5 years; T2DM patients, 8/17, 64 ± 6 years, 16.2 ± 6.9 years; T2DM patients (>70 years of age), 9/16, 75 ± 4 years, 19.7 ± 7.0 years]. After assessment of neuropathy (temperature, pain, and vibration perception), the patients participated in two dexterity test batteries [Jebsen-Taylor hand-function test (JHFT) and motoric performance series (MPS)].
RESULTS: Patients with type 2 diabetes showed disturbed vibration perception as compared to the other groups. The dexterity results were influenced by age to a large extent. Older T2DM patients performed worst in the majority of the subtests (e.g., JHFT, writing nondominant hand: control, 40.8 ± 11.7 s; T1DM, 46.3 ± 50.9 s, not significant versus control; old T2DM, 68.1 ± 29.5 s, p < .05; young T2DM, 52.5 ± 26.2 s, p < .05). Patients with type 1 diabetes showed similar JHFT and MPS results than the 10-year-older control subjects and performed outside of the age-dependent normal reference range.
CONCLUSIONS: Manual skills and dexterity differed between the groups, and age-corrected reduced skills were common in both T1DM and T2DM patients in this study. Our findings underline the importance of considering dexterity and manual skills when designing medical devices for patients with diabetes mellitus.
© 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21303639      PMCID: PMC3045243          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  16 in total

1.  Analysis: including visually impaired participants in validation design studies of diabetes technology.

Authors:  Mark Uslan; Morgan Blubaugh
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  An objective and standardized test of hand function.

Authors:  R H Jebsen; N Taylor; R B Trieschmann; M J Trotter; L A Howard
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Changes in hand function in the aging adult as determined by the Jebsen Test of Hand Function.

Authors:  M E Hackel; G A Wolfe; S M Bang; J S Canfield
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-05

Review 4.  Barriers to good glycaemic control: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  F J Snoek
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-09

Review 5.  Diabetic patients: Psychological aspects.

Authors:  Fatemeh Adili; Bagher Larijani; Mohammadreza Haghighatpanah
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Vibrotactile sense in median and ulnar nerve innervated fingers of men with Type 2 diabetes, normal or impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  L B Dahlin; S Thrainsdottir; R Cederlund; N O B Thomsen; K F Eriksson; I Rosén; T Speidel; G Sundqvist
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Evaluation of the Modified Jebsen Test of Hand Function and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke.

Authors:  T J H Bovend'Eerdt; H Dawes; H Johansen-Berg; D T Wade
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Hand function in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  J E Casanova; J S Casanova; M J Young
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Assessing subclinical tactual deficits in the hand function of diabetic blind persons at risk for peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  David Travieso; Susan J Lederman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Cognitive and psychomotor function in hypoglycemia: response error patterns and retest reliability.

Authors:  Hartmut Schächinger; Daniel Cox; Lilly Linder; Stuart Brody; Ulrich Keller
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Actionable self-monitoring of blood glucose: redefining the role for patients using multiple daily injection therapy.

Authors:  David Kerr; Rebecca Messing; Ansgar Resch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 2.  Benefits and Challenges of Diabetes Technology Use in Older Adults.

Authors:  Elena Toschi; Medha N Munshi
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  FlexTouch: An Insulin Pen-Injector with a Low Activation Force Across Different Insulin Formulations, Needle Technologies, and Temperature Conditions.

Authors:  Niels Gudiksen; Thibaud Hofstätter; Birgitte B Rønn; Thomas Sparre
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Point-of-Care HbA1c Testing with the A1cNow Test Kit in General Practice Dental Clinics: A Pilot Study Involving Its Accuracy and Practical Issues in Its Use.

Authors:  Shiela M Strauss; Mary Rosedale; Michael A Pesce; Caroline Juterbock; Navjot Kaur; Joe DePaola; Deborah Goetz; Mark S Wolff; Dolores Malaspina; Ann Danoff
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2014-12

5.  A comparison of glide force characteristics between 2 prefilled insulin lispro pens.

Authors:  Tina M Rees; Amanda H Lennartz; Debra A Ignaut
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-14

6.  Detecting subtle fingertip sensory and motor dysfunction in adults with type II diabetes.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Aisha Khan; Nereyda Ochoa; Morali D Sharma; Cecile L Phan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Bilateral deficits in fine motor control ability and manual dexterity in women with fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  Marta Pérez-de-Heredia-Torres; Rosa M Martínez-Piédrola; Margarita Cigarán-Méndez; Ricardo Ortega-Santiago; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Comparison of patient preference for two insulin injection pen devices in relation to patient dexterity skills.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Christina Schipper; Marcus Niemeyer; Marianne Qvist; Andrea Löffler; Thomas Forst; Petra B Musholt
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

9.  Comparative Assessment of Lixisenatide, Exenatide, and Liraglutide Pen Devices: A Pilot User-Based Study.

Authors:  Udo Stauder; Diplom Enginee; Hina Elton; Alfred Penfornis; Steve Edelman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 10.  Battle of GLP-1 delivery technologies.

Authors:  Minzhi Yu; Mason M Benjamin; Santhanakrishnan Srinivasan; Emily E Morin; Ekaterina I Shishatskaya; Steven P Schwendeman; Anna Schwendeman
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.