Literature DB >> 21303441

Evaluation of medetomidine-ketamine and dexmedetomidine-ketamine in Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis).

Tim Bouts1, Polly Taylor, Karla Berry, Andrew Routh, Frank Gasthuys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate physiological and sedative/immobilization effects of medetomidine or dexmedetomidine combined with ketamine in free-ranging Chinese water deer (CWD). STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: 10 free-ranging adult Chinese water deer (11.0±2.6 kg).
METHODS: Animals were darted intramuscularly with 0.08±0.004 mg kg(-1) medetomidine and 3.2±0.2 mg kg(-1) ketamine (MK) or 0.04±0.01 mg kg(-1) dexmedetomidine and 2.9±0.1 mg kg(-1) ketamine (DMK). If the animal was still laterally recumbent after 60 minutes of immobilization, atipamezole was administered intravenously (MK: 0.4±0.02 mg kg(-1), DMK: 0.2±0.03 mg kg(-1)). Heart rate (HR) respiratory rate (f(R)) and temperature were recorded at 5-minute intervals. Arterial blood was taken 15 and 45 minutes after initial injection. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test or ANOVA. p<0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Animals became recumbent rapidly in both groups. Most had involuntary ear twitches, but there was no response to external stimuli. There were no statistical differences in mean HR (MK: 75±14 beats minute(-1); DMK: 85±21 beats minute(-1)), f(R) (MK: 51±35 breaths minute(-1); DMK; 36±9 breaths minute(-1)), temperature (MK: 38.1±0.7 °C; DMK: 38.4±0.5 °C), blood gas values (MK: PaO(2) 63±6 mmHg, PaCO(2) 49.6±2.6 mmHg, HCO(3)(-) 30.8±4.5 mmol L(-1); DMK: PaO(2) 77±35 mmHg, PaCO(2) 45.9±11.5 mmHg, HCO(3)(-) 31.0±4.5 mmol L(-1)) and biochemical values between groups but temperature decreased in both groups. All animals needed antagonism of immobilization after 60 minutes. Recovery was quick and uneventful. There were no adverse effects after recovery. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both anaesthetic protocols provided satisfactory immobilisation. There was no clear preference for either protocol and both appear suitable for CWD.
© 2011 The Authors. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia © 2011 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21303441     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00591.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg        ISSN: 1467-2987            Impact factor:   1.648


  2 in total

1.  A Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparison of Medetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam and Dexmedetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam Anesthesia in Free-Ranging Brown Bears (Ursus Arctos).

Authors:  Núria Fandos Esteruelas; Marc Cattet; Andreas Zedrosser; Gordon B Stenhouse; Susanne Küker; Alina L Evans; Jon M Arnemo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A comparison of medetomidine and its active enantiomer dexmedetomidine when administered with ketamine in mice.

Authors:  Wesley M Burnside; Paul A Flecknell; Angus I Cameron; Aurélie A Thomas
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.741

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.