Literature DB >> 21302814

Ecological boundary detection using Bayesian areal wombling.

Matthew C Fitzpatrick1, Evan L Preisser, Adam Porter, Joseph Elkinton, Lance A Waller, Bradley P Carlin, Aaron M Ellison.   

Abstract

The study of ecological boundaries and their dynamics is of fundamental importance to much of ecology, biogeography, and evolution. Over the past two decades, boundary analysis (of which wombling is a subfield) has received considerable research attention, resulting in multiple approaches for the quantification of ecological boundaries. Nonetheless, few methods have been developed that can simultaneously (1) analyze spatially homogenized data sets (i.e., areal data in the form of polygons rather than point-reference data); (2) account for spatial structure in these data and uncertainty associated with them; and (3) objectively assign probabilities to boundaries once detected. Here we describe the application of a Bayesian hierarchical framework for boundary detection developed in public health, which addresses these issues but which has seen limited application in ecology. As examples, we analyze simulated spread data and the historic pattern of spread of an invasive species, the hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae), using county-level summaries of the year of first reported infestation and several covariates potentially important to influencing the observed spread dynamics. Bayesian areal wombling is a promising approach for analyzing ecological boundaries and dynamics related to changes in the distributions of native and invasive species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21302814      PMCID: PMC4024662          DOI: 10.1890/10-0807.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  6 in total

1.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis.

Authors:  Catherine H Graham; Simon Ferrier; Falk Huettman; Craig Moritz; A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Differential systematics.

Authors:  W H WOMBLE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1951-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations.

Authors:  Matthew C Fitzpatrick; Evan L Preisser; Aaron M Ellison; Joseph S Elkinton
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Mountains, valleys, and rivers: The transmission of raccoon rabies over a heterogeneous landscape.

Authors:  David C Wheeler; Lance A Waller
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 1.524

5.  Hierarchical and joint site-edge methods for medicare hospice service region boundary analysis.

Authors:  Haijun Ma; Bradley P Carlin; Sudipto Banerjee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Variation in winter survival of the invasive hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) across the eastern United States.

Authors:  R Talbot Trotter; Kathleen S Shields
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.377

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Quantifying spatio-temporal variation of invasion spread.

Authors:  Joshua Goldstein; Jaewoo Park; Murali Haran; Andrew Liebhold; Ottar N Bjørnstad
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Comparing the response of birds and butterflies to vegetation-based mountain ecotones using boundary detection approaches.

Authors:  Rafi Kent; Oded Levanoni; Eran Banker; Guy Pe'er; Salit Kark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.