Literature DB >> 21302335

Demographic differences in Down syndrome livebirths in the US from 1989 to 2006.

James F X Egan1, Kathleen Smith, Diane Timms, Jay M Bolnick, Winston A Campbell, Peter A Benn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore demographic differences in Down syndrome livebirths in the United States.
METHODS: Using National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) birth certificate data from 1989 to 2006 we analyzed Down syndrome livebirths after correcting for under-reporting. We created six subsets based on maternal age (15-34 and 35-49 years old); US regions, that is, Northeast, Midwest, South and West; marital status, (married, unmarried); education, ( ≤ 12 years, ≥ 13 years); race, (white, black); and Hispanic ethnicity, (non-Hispanic, Hispanic). We estimated expected Down syndrome livebirths assuming no change in birth certificate reporting. The percentage of expected Down syndrome livebirths actually born was calculated by year.
RESULTS: There were 72 613 424 livebirths from 1989 to 2006. There were 122 519 Down syndrome livebirths expected and 65 492 were actually born. The Midwest had the most expected Down syndrome livebirths actually born (67.6%); the West was lowest (44.4%). More expected Down syndrome livebirths were born to women who were 15 to 34 years old (61 vs 43.8%) and to those with ≤ 12 years education (60.4 vs 46.9%), white race (56.6 vs 37%), unmarried (56.0 vs 52.5%), and of Hispanic ethnicity (55.0 vs 53.3%).
CONCLUSION: The percentage of expected Down syndrome livebirths actually born varies by demographics.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21302335     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

Review 1.  Human Germline Genome Editing.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Douglas P Mortlock; Derek T Scholes; Yvonne Bombard; Lawrence C Brody; W Andrew Faucett; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Laura Hercher; Rosario Isasi; Anna Middleton; Kiran Musunuru; Daniel Shriner; Alice Virani; Caroline E Young
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Current estimate of Down Syndrome population prevalence in the United States.

Authors:  Angela P Presson; Ginger Partyka; Kristin M Jensen; Owen J Devine; Sonja A Rasmussen; Linda L McCabe; Edward R B McCabe
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Kathryn B Sheets; Blythe G Crissman; Cori D Feist; Susan L Sell; Lisa R Johnson; Kelly C Donahue; Diane Masser-Frye; Gail S Brookshire; Amanda M Carre; Danielle Lagrave; Campbell K Brasington
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Better beings?

Authors:  Amber Dance
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Perinatal Natural History of the Ts1Cje Mouse Model of Down Syndrome: Growth Restriction, Early Mortality, Heart Defects, and Delayed Development.

Authors:  Millie A Ferrés; Diana W Bianchi; Ashley E Siegel; Roderick T Bronson; Gordon S Huggins; Faycal Guedj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Heart rate and blood pressure in male Ts65Dn mice: a model to investigate cardiovascular responses in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Lara R DeRuisseau; Candace N Receno; Kevin S Heffernan; Caitlin M Cunningham
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.