Literature DB >> 21302272

Environmental effects on skeletal versus dental development II: further testing of a basic assumption in human osteological research.

E L N Conceição1, H F V Cardoso.   

Abstract

This study further tests the general assumption that skeletal development is more sensitive to socioeconomic factors than dental development in a sample of modern immature Portuguese skeletons (N = 41) of known sex, age, and socioeconomic background. Skeletal development was assessed from skeletal maturation of the knee and dental development was assessed from schedules of tooth formation. Discrepancies between physiological age (skeletal and dental age) and chronological age were used as a measure of developmental status. A positive score indicates that physiological age is in advance of chronological age, whereas a negative score indicates the reverse. Two socioeconomic groups, one of low and the other of high socioeconomic status, were created based on the occupation of the father and on the place of residence, and developmental status was compared between the two socioeconomic groups. Results confirm previous studies by showing that dental development is less affected by environmental insults than skeletal maturation. While socioeconomic differences in skeletal maturation range from 1.20 to 1.22 years (15-18% of chronological age), socioeconomic differences in dental maturation range from 0.51 to 0.53 years (4-9% of chronological age). Compared to a previous study, results also suggest that skeletal maturation is more affected than skeletal growth. Additionally, an adaptation of the radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the knee is proposed for use with dry skeletal material.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21302272     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  6 in total

1.  Age estimation of immature human skeletal remains using the post-natal development of the occipital bone.

Authors:  H F V Cardoso; J Gomes; V Campanacho; L Marinho
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Malnutrition has no effect on the timing of human tooth formation.

Authors:  Fadil Elamin; Helen M Liversidge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Craniofacial and oral alterations in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1.

Authors:  Vivian Visnapuu; Sirkku Peltonen; Lotta Alivuotila; Risto-Pekka Happonen; Juha Peltonen
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  Illegal tusk harvest and the decline of tusk size in the African elephant.

Authors:  Patrick I Chiyo; Vincent Obanda; David K Korir
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Deep orofacial phenotyping of population-based infants with isolated cleft lip and isolated cleft palate.

Authors:  Mimi Yow; Nuno V Hermann; Yuan Wei; Agneta Karsten; Sven Kreiborg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Machine learning assisted Cameriere method for dental age estimation.

Authors:  Shihui Shen; Zihao Liu; Jian Wang; Linfeng Fan; Fang Ji; Jiang Tao
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.