Literature DB >> 21302201

Animal model for endoscopic neurosurgical training: technical note.

J C Fernandez-Miranda1, J Barges-Coll, D M Prevedello, J Engh, C Snyderman, R Carrau, P A Gardner, A B Kassam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The learning curve for endonasal endoscopic and neuroendoscopic port surgery is long and often associated with an increase in complication rates as surgeons gain experience. We present an animal model for laboratory training aiming to encourage the young generation of neurosurgeons to pursue proficiency in endoscopic neurosurgical techniques.
METHODS: 20 Wistar rats were used as models. The animals were introduced into a physical trainer with multiple ports to carry out fully endoscopic microsurgical procedures. The vertical and horizontal dimensions of the paired ports (simulated nostrils) were: 35×20 mm, 35×15 mm, 25×15 mm, and 25×10 mm. 2 additional single 11.5 mm endoscopic ports were added. Surgical depth varied as desired between 8 and 15 cm. The cervical and abdominal regions were the focus of the endoscopic microsurgical exercises.
RESULTS: The different endoscopic neurosurgical techniques were effectively trained at the millimetric dimension. Levels of progressive surgical difficulty depending upon the endoneurosurgical skills set needed for a particular surgical exercise were distinguished. LEVEL 1 is soft-tissue microdissection (exposure of cervical muscular plane and retroperitoneal space); LEVEL 2 is soft-tissue-vascular and vascular-capsule microdissection (aorto-cava exposure, carotid sheath opening, external jugular vein isolation); LEVEL 3 is artery-nerve microdissection (carotid-vagal separation); LEVEL 4 is artery-vein microdissection (aorto-cava separation); LEVEL 5 is vascular repair and microsuturing (aortic rupture), which verified the lack of current proper instrumentation.
CONCLUSION: The animal training model presented here has the potential to shorten the length of the learning curve in endonasal endoscopic and neuroendoscopic port surgery and reduce the incidence of training-related surgical complications. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21302201     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1269927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg        ISSN: 0946-7211


  6 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on rhino-neurosurgery.

Authors:  Werner Hosemann; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 2.  Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  W Hosemann; C Draf
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

3.  Chicken wing training model for endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Sananthan Sivakanthan; Carlos Diogenes Pinheiro-Neto; Paul A Gardner; Carl H Snyderman; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-07-12

4.  A Perfusion-based Human Cadaveric Model for Management of Carotid Artery Injury during Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Martin Pham; Aydemir Kale; Yvette Marquez; Jesse Winer; Brian Lee; Brianna Harris; Michael Minnetti; Joseph Carey; Steven Giannotta; Gabriel Zada
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2014-05-02

5.  Implantation of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Aneurysm Models into Cadaveric Specimens: A New Training Paradigm to Allow for Improvements in Cerebrovascular Surgery and Research.

Authors:  Arnau Benet; Julio Plata-Bello; Adib A Abla; Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton; David Saloner; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Learning neuroendoscopy with an exoscope system (video telescopic operating monitor): Early clinical results.

Authors:  Vijay Parihar; Y R Yadav; Yatin Kher; Shailendra Ratre; Ashish Sethi; Dhananjaya Sharma
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.