PURPOSE: Due to their high water solubilities and mobilities, persistent, polar perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) such as perfluorinated carboxylates and sulfonates are likely to end up in the oceans. In part 1 of this study, their distribution in North and Baltic Sea water is reported, being of special interest because these seas are surrounded by highly industrialized countries with high population densities. METHODS: A combination of solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was used after optimisation to determine nine PFCs with chain lengths of C(4) to C(10) in water samples at ultra-trace levels. RESULTS: The observed concentration distribution and gradients were explained by oceanographic mixing processes and currents. The big rivers were identified as major input sources. At the mouth of the river Elbe, concentrations of 9 ng/L were observed for perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), and 8 ng/L for perfluorooctylsulfonate (PFOS); all other PFC concentrations ranged from 0.6 to 1.7 ng/L. At coastal stations, concentrations decreased to 3.8 ng/L (PFOA) and 1.8 ng/L (PFOS), dropping to 0.13 and 0.09 ng/L, respectively, towards the open sea. Along the Dutch coast, high perfluorobutylsulfonate concentrations (3.9 ng/L) were observed as regional characteristics. In the Baltic Sea, fairly even PFC distributions with low gradients were observed. Again, PFOA and PFOS were the major compounds (up to 1.1 and 0.9 ng/L). CONCLUSION: The results underline the necessity to include PFCs in marine monitoring programs. Water was found to be a good matrix for monitoring environmental levels, sources, and transport pathways of PFCs.
PURPOSE: Due to their high water solubilities and mobilities, persistent, polar perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) such as perfluorinated carboxylates and sulfonates are likely to end up in the oceans. In part 1 of this study, their distribution in North and Baltic Sea water is reported, being of special interest because these seas are surrounded by highly industrialized countries with high population densities. METHODS: A combination of solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was used after optimisation to determine nine PFCs with chain lengths of C(4) to C(10) in water samples at ultra-trace levels. RESULTS: The observed concentration distribution and gradients were explained by oceanographic mixing processes and currents. The big rivers were identified as major input sources. At the mouth of the river Elbe, concentrations of 9 ng/L were observed for perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), and 8 ng/L for perfluorooctylsulfonate (PFOS); all other PFC concentrations ranged from 0.6 to 1.7 ng/L. At coastal stations, concentrations decreased to 3.8 ng/L (PFOA) and 1.8 ng/L (PFOS), dropping to 0.13 and 0.09 ng/L, respectively, towards the open sea. Along the Dutch coast, high perfluorobutylsulfonate concentrations (3.9 ng/L) were observed as regional characteristics. In the Baltic Sea, fairly even PFC distributions with low gradients were observed. Again, PFOA and PFOS were the major compounds (up to 1.1 and 0.9 ng/L). CONCLUSION: The results underline the necessity to include PFCs in marine monitoring programs. Water was found to be a good matrix for monitoring environmental levels, sources, and transport pathways of PFCs.
Authors: K Kannan; J Koistinen; K Beckmen; T Evans; J F Gorzelany; K J Hansen; P D Jones; E Helle; M Nyman; J P Giesy Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2001-04-15 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Konstantinos Prevedouros; Ian T Cousins; Robert C Buck; Stephen H Korzeniowski Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2006-01-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: S Wei; L Q Chen; S Taniyasu; M K So; M B Murphy; N Yamashita; L W Y Yeung; P K S Lam Journal: Mar Pollut Bull Date: 2007-09-18 Impact factor: 5.553
Authors: Norbert Theobald; Christina Caliebe; Wolfgang Gerwinski; Heinrich Hühnerfuss; Peter Lepom Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: M K So; S Taniyasu; N Yamashita; J P Giesy; J Zheng; Z Fang; S H Im; Paul K S Lam Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Heinz Rüdel; Winfried Schröder; Karl Theo von der Trenck; Gerhard A Wiesmüller Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2009-05-31 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Norbert Theobald; Christina Caliebe; Wolfgang Gerwinski; Heinrich Hühnerfuss; Peter Lepom Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 4.223