Literature DB >> 21301636

Droplet charging regimes for ultrasonic atomization of a liquid electrolyte in an external electric field.

Thomas P Forbes, F Levent Degertekin, Andrei G Fedorov.   

Abstract

Distinct regimes of droplet charging, determined by the dominant charge transport process, are identified for an ultrasonic droplet ejector using electrohydrodynamic computational simulations, a fundamental scale analysis, and experimental measurements. The regimes of droplet charging are determined by the relative magnitudes of the dimensionless Strouhal and electric Reynolds numbers, which are a function of the process (pressure forcing), advection, and charge relaxation time scales for charge transport. Optimal (net maximum) droplet charging has been identified to exist for conditions in which the electric Reynolds number is of the order of the inverse Strouhal number, i.e., the charge relaxation time is on the order of the pressure forcing (droplet formation) time scale. The conditions necessary for optimal droplet charging have been identified as a function of the dimensionless Debye number (i.e., liquid conductivity), external electric field (magnitude and duration), and atomization drive signal (frequency and amplitude). The specific regime of droplet charging also determines the functional relationship between droplet charge and charging electric field strength. The commonly expected linear relationship between droplet charge and external electric field strength is only found when either the inverse of the Strouhal number is less than the electric Reynolds number, i.e., the charge relaxation is slower than both the advection and external pressure forcing, or in the electrostatic limit, i.e., when charge relaxation is much faster than all other processes. The analysis provides a basic understanding of the dominant physics of droplet charging with implications to many important applications, such as electrospray mass spectrometry, ink jet printing, and drop-on-demand manufacturing.

Year:  2011        PMID: 21301636      PMCID: PMC3033869          DOI: 10.1063/1.3541818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)        ISSN: 1070-6631            Impact factor:   3.521


  13 in total

1.  Dynamics of Drop Formation in an Electric Field.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 8.128

2.  Single-pulse nanoelectrospray ionization.

Authors:  W Travis Berggren; Michael S Westphall; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Flexing the electrified meniscus: the birth of a jet in electrosprays.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Lida Parvin; Linda Heffernan; Akos Vertes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Dynamics of field-induced droplet ionization: time-resolved studies of distortion, jetting, and progeny formation from charged and neutral methanol droplets exposed to strong electric fields.

Authors:  Ronald L Grimm; J L Beauchamp
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Electrohydrodynamic generation and delivery of monodisperse picoliter droplets using a poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchip.

Authors:  Sung Jae Kim; Yong-Ak Song; Paul L Skipper; Jongyoon Han
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  High-resolution electrohydrodynamic jet printing.

Authors:  Jang-Ung Park; Matt Hardy; Seong Jun Kang; Kira Barton; Kurt Adair; Deep Kishore Mukhopadhyay; Chang Young Lee; Michael S Strano; Andrew G Alleyne; John G Georgiadis; Placid M Ferreira; John A Rogers
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Electrohydrodynamics of charge separation in droplet-based ion sources with time-varying electrical and mechanical actuation.

Authors:  Thomas P Forbes; F Levent Degertekin; Andrei G Fedorov
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Analytical performance of a venturi-assisted array of micromachined ultrasonic electrosprays coupled to ion trap mass spectrometry for the analysis of peptides and proteins.

Authors:  Christina Y Hampton; Thomas P Forbes; Mark J Varady; J Mark Meacham; Andrei G Fedorov; F Levent Degertekin; Facundo M Fernández
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Comparison of the internal energy deposition of Venturi-assisted electrospray ionization and a Venturi-assisted array of micromachined ultrasonic electrosprays (AMUSE).

Authors:  Christina Y Hampton; Catherine J Silvestri; Thomas P Forbes; Mark J Varady; J Mark Meacham; Andrei G Fedorov; F Levent Degertekin; Facundo M Fernández
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Characterization of charge separation in the Array of Micromachined UltraSonic Electrospray (AMUSE) ion source for mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Thomas P Forbes; R Brent Dixon; David C Muddiman; F Levent Degertekin; Andrei G Fedorov
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.109

View more
  1 in total

1.  DRILL: An Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Interface for Improved Sensitivity via Inertial Droplet Sorting and Electrohydrodynamic Focusing in a Swirling Flow.

Authors:  Peter A Kottke; Jung Y Lee; Alex P Jonke; Chinthaka A Seneviratne; Elizabeth S Hecht; David C Muddiman; Matthew P Torres; Andrei G Fedorov
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 6.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.