Literature DB >> 21300480

Dynamic MRI analysis of tumor and organ motion during rest and deglutition and margin assessment for radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer.

Julie A Bradley1, Eric S Paulson, Ergun Ahunbay, Christopher Schultz, X Allen Li, Dian Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify swallowing frequency and tumor and normal structure displacements during deglutition using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to determine planning target volume (PTV) margins to account for resting and deglutition-induced displacements in patients with head-and-neck cancer (HNC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with HNC were imaged in the treatment position using dynamic MRI. Sagittal images were acquired. Two-dimensional displacement was analyzed using contours of normal structures and GTV drawn for one swallowing event. Deglutition-induced displacements were quantified based on position change during deglutition relative to preswallow structure location for anterior (A), posterior (P), superior (S), and inferior (I) directions. Additional long-time MRI series were obtained from a subset of 11 patients while they were resting in order to determine swallowing frequency and duration. PTV margins to account for setup error, frequency and duration of deglutition, and resting and deglutition-induced GTV motion were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean maximum resting displacements ranged from 1.5 to 3.1 mm for combined GTV subsites. Mean maximum swallowing GTV displacement for combined subsites ranged from 4.0 to 11.6 mm. Swallowing was nonperiodic, with a frequency ranging from 0 to 19 swallows over 12.8 min and mean swallow duration of 3.5 s. Based on the average swallowing characteristics in this cohort, the average PTV margins to account for setup error and tumor motion are estimated to be 4.7 mm anteriorly, 4.2 mm posteriorly, 4.7 mm inferiorly, and 6.0 mm superiorly.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurable mean maximum resting displacement for the GTV indicates that tumor motion occurs even when the patient is not swallowing. Nonuniform margins should be used as a standard PTV margin that accounts for setup error and tumor motion in radiotherapy of HNC unless adaptive radiotherapy with respect to intrafraction tumor motion is performed. The PTV margin can be individualized to a single patient's swallowing characteristics or calculated as an average based on the swallowing data from the cohort.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21300480     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

1.  T1-2 glottic cancer treated with radiotherapy and/or surgery.

Authors:  Mohamed Shelan; Lukas Anschuetz; Adrian D Schubert; Beat Bojaxhiu; Alan Dal Pra; Frank Behrensmeier; Daniel M Aebersold; Roland Giger; Olgun Elicin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Motion correction options in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  A prospective analysis of inter- and intrafractional errors to calculate CTV to PTV margins in head and neck patients.

Authors:  J Cacicedo; J F Perez; R Ortiz de Zarate; O del Hoyo; F Casquero; A Gómez-Iturriaga; A Lasso; E Boveda; P Bilbao
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  CTV Guidance for Head and Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Beth M Beadle; Carryn M Anderson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Automated algorithm for calculation of setup corrections and planning target volume margins for offline image-guided radiotherapy protocols.

Authors:  Auwal Abubakar; Nada Alia M Zamri; Shazril Imran Shaukat; Hafiz Mohd Zin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Estimation of adequate setup margins and threshold for position errors requiring immediate attention in head and neck cancer radiotherapy based on 2D image guidance.

Authors:  Mika Kapanen; Marko Laaksomaa; Tapio Tulijoki; Seppo Peltola; Tuija Wigren; Simo Hyödynmaa; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Estimation of daily interfractional larynx residual setup error after isocentric alignment for head and neck radiotherapy: quality assurance implications for target volume and organs-at-risk margination using daily CT on- rails imaging.

Authors:  Charles A Baron; Musaddiq J Awan; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Imad Akel; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Adam S Garden; Brandon A Dyer; Laurence Court; Parag R Sevak; Esengul Kocak-Uzel; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  MRI-based Assessment of 3D Intrafractional Motion of Head and Neck Cancer for Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Dualta McQuaid; Alex Dunlop; Kee H Wong; Liam C Welsh; Angela M Riddell; Dow-Mu Koh; Uwe Oelfke; Martin O Leach; Christopher M Nutting; Shreerang A Bhide; Kevin J Harrington; Rafal Panek; Kate L Newbold
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Organ motion in linac-based SBRT for glottic cancer.

Authors:  Annarita Perillo; Valeria Landoni; Alessia Farneti; Giuseppe Sanguineti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Consequences of tumor planning target volume reduction in treatment of T2-T4 laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia A J M Vugts; Chris H J Terhaard; Marielle E P Philippens; Frank A Pameijer; Nicolien Kasperts; Cornelis P J Raaijmakers
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.