Literature DB >> 21300478

Predicting pelvic lymph node involvement in current-era prostate cancer.

Sophia Rahman1, Harry Cosmatos, Giatri Dave, Stephen Williams, Michael Tome.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Roach formula [2/3 × prostate-specific antigen + (Gleason score--6) × 10], derived in 1993 during the early prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening era, has been used to predict the risk of pelvic lymph node involvement in patients with prostate cancer. In the current era of widespread PSA screening with a shift to earlier disease stages, there is evidence to suggest that the Roach score overestimates risk of nodal metastasis. This study retrospectively reviews the validity of this formula as a prediction tool. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective institutional review including men with clinical T1c-T3 prostate cancer, with baseline PSA levels and biopsy-obtained Gleason scores who underwent radical prostatectomy with pelvic node dissection from 2001 through 2009 (N = 1,022). The predicted risk of nodal involvement was calculated for each patient using the Roach formula and then compared with actual rates following surgery.
RESULTS: The study included 1,022 patients; 99.6% had clinical T1c/T2 disease, with a mean of 10.3 lymph nodes surgically evaluated. Overall, 42 patients (4.1%) had nodal metastasis. For every range of scores, the Roach formula overestimates the risk of nodal involvement. Observed nodal positivity was 1%, 6.3%, 10%, 15.2%, and 16.7% for Roach scores ≤ 10%, >10%-20%, >20%-30%, >30%-40%, and >40%, respectively. The Roach score overestimates the risk by approximately 4.5-fold in patients with scores ≤ 10%, by 2.5-fold for all scores between 10% and 40%, and by 4-fold for scores >40%.
CONCLUSION: The Roach formula overpredicts the risk of pelvic nodal involvement in current-era prostate cancer patients undergoing regular PSA screening and with mainly T1c/T2 disease. Contemporary patients are much less likely to have nodal involvement for a given PSA and Gleason score.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21300478     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  Elective pelvic versus prostate bed-only salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Changhoon Song; Hyun-Cheol Kang; Jae-Sung Kim; Keun-Yong Eom; In Ah Kim; Jin-Beom Chung; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Predictive value of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for lymph node metastasis in locally advanced prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Otto; Peter Gerber; Wolfgang Rößler; Wolf F Wieland; Stefan Denzinger
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10-03

3.  Lymph Node Involvement in Treatment-Naïve Prostate Cancer Patients: Correlation of PSMA PET/CT Imaging and Roach Formula in 280 Men in Radiotherapeutic Management.

Authors:  Stefan A Koerber; Gerald Stach; Clemens Kratochwil; Matthias F Haefner; Henrik Rathke; Klaus Herfarth; Klaus Kopka; Tim Holland-Letz; Peter L Choyke; Uwe Haberkorn; Juergen Debus; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 11.082

4.  The Roach Equation: Value of Old Clinical Tools in the Era of New Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Yun Rose Li; Mack Roach
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 11.082

5.  Sentinel lymph node imaging guided IMRT for prostate cancer: Individualized pelvic radiation therapy versus RTOG guidelines.

Authors:  Chien P Chen; Julian Johnson; Youngho Seo; Vivian K Weinberg; Katsuto Shinohara; I-Chow J Hsu; Mack Roach
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-17

6.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-PET imaging on target volume definition and guidelines in radiation oncology - a patterns of failure analysis in patients with primary diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Schiller; M Devecka; T Maurer; M Eiber; J Gschwend; M Schwaiger; S E Combs; G Habl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in patients with prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jae-Uk Jeong; Taek-Keun Nam; Ju-Young Song; Mee Sun Yoon; Sung-Ja Ahn; Woong-Ki Chung; Ick Joon Cho; Yong-Hyub Kim; Shin Haeng Cho; Seung Il Jung; Dong Deuk Kwon
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Prevalence of lymph node metastasis in radical prostatectomy; a retrospective and multicenter study in iran.

Authors:  Mohsen Ayati; Mohammad Reza Nowroozi; Hassan Jamshidian; Elnaz Ayati; Farhad Zarghan
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03

9.  The outcome and prognostic factors for lymph node recurrence after node-sparing definitive external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Jen Wang; Chao-Yuan Huang; Wei-Hsien Hou; Chia-Chun Wang; Keng-Hsueh Lan; Chung-Hsin Chen; Hong-Jen Yu; Ming-Kuen Lai; Ann-Lii Cheng; Shihh-Ping Liu; Yeong-Shiau Pu; Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  External Validation of an MRI-Derived Radiomics Model to Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Surgery for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Bourbonne; Georges Fournier; Martin Vallières; François Lucia; Laurent Doucet; Valentin Tissot; Gilles Cuvelier; Stephane Hue; Henri Le Penn Du; Luc Perdriel; Nicolas Bertrand; Frederic Staroz; Dimitris Visvikis; Olivier Pradier; Mathieu Hatt; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.