Literature DB >> 21299316

Grouping information for judgments.

Anuj K Shah1, Daniel M Oppenheimer.   

Abstract

Models of cue weighting in judgment have typically focused on how decision-makers weight cues individually. Here, the authors propose that people might recognize and weight groups of cues. They examine how judgments change when decision-makers focus on cues individually or as parts of groups. Several experiments demonstrate that people can spontaneously pack information into cue groups. Moreover, group-level weighting depends on how people assess similarity or how they think of categorical hierarchies. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21299316     DOI: 10.1037/a0021946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  2 in total

1.  Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Bridgid Finn; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

2.  From mind to matter: neural correlates of abstract and concrete mindsets.

Authors:  Michael Gilead; Nira Liberman; Anat Maril
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.