| Literature DB >> 21299305 |
Inge Henselmans1, Joke Fleer1, Eric van Sonderen1, Ans Smink1, Robbert Sanderman1, Adelita V Ranchor1.
Abstract
The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21299305 DOI: 10.1037/a0021536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Aging ISSN: 0882-7974