Literature DB >> 21298384

Different relation between ERCC1 overexpression and treatment outcomes of two platinum agents in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma patients.

I G Hwang1, J S Jang, J H Do, J H Kang, G W Lee, S Y Oh, H C Kwon, H J Jun, H Y Lim, S Lee, K C Chi, S J Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) expression on treatment outcomes in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (ABTA) patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.
METHODS: One hundred and six patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of biliary tract were enrolled at 5 institutions in South Korea between January 2002 and September 2008. Of 106 patients, 93 were assessed by immunohistochemistry from tissue specimens. Sixty-five patients were treated with cisplatin-based regimens and the other 28 treated with oxaliplatin-based ones.
RESULTS: For total study population, no significant differences were noted in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between ERCC1-negative and ERCC1-positive patients, respectively (4.2 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.116; 7.0 vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.143). In patients treated with cisplatin-based regimens, median PFS and OS were significantly longer in ERCC1-negative group than in ERCC1-positive group, respectively (4.6 vs. 1.9 months, p = 0.014; 9.1 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.017). Disease control rate (DCR) was better in patients with ERCC1 negative than in patients with ERCC1 positive (p = 0.048). On the other hand, in patients treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens, median PFS and OS tended to be longer in ERCC1-positive group, but these did not reach statistical significances. Response rate was better in patients with ERCC1 positive (p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: ERCC1 shows a significant prognostic value in ABTA patients treated with cisplatin. A survival benefit was observed in ERCC1-negative patients from cisplatin-containing chemotherapy but not from oxaliplatin-containing ones. The action mechanism of ERCC1 on cisplatin may be different from that on oxaliplatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21298384     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1558-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Jesus M Banales; Jose J G Marin; Angela Lamarca; Pedro M Rodrigues; Shahid A Khan; Lewis R Roberts; Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Jesper B Andersen; Chiara Braconi; Diego F Calvisi; Maria J Perugorria; Luca Fabris; Luke Boulter; Rocio I R Macias; Eugenio Gaudio; Domenico Alvaro; Sergio A Gradilone; Mario Strazzabosco; Marco Marzioni; Cédric Coulouarn; Laura Fouassier; Chiara Raggi; Pietro Invernizzi; Joachim C Mertens; Anja Moncsek; Sumera Rizvi; Julie Heimbach; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Jordi Bruix; Alejandro Forner; John Bridgewater; Juan W Valle; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Prognostic role of ERCC1 in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua A Roth; Josh J Carlson
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 3.  DNA Damage Response Inhibitors in Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  Öykü Gönül Geyik; Giulia Anichini; Engin Ulukaya; Fabio Marra; Chiara Raggi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and excision repair cross complement-1 (ERCC1) expression in esophageal cancers and response to cisplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anubha Bharthuar; Sana Saif Ur Rehman; Jennifer D Black; Charles Levea; Usha Malhotra; Terry L Mashtare; Renuka Iyer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08

5.  Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA).

Authors:  Jesus M Banales; Vincenzo Cardinale; Guido Carpino; Marco Marzioni; Jesper B Andersen; Pietro Invernizzi; Guro E Lind; Trine Folseraas; Stuart J Forbes; Laura Fouassier; Andreas Geier; Diego F Calvisi; Joachim C Mertens; Michael Trauner; Antonio Benedetti; Luca Maroni; Javier Vaquero; Rocio I R Macias; Chiara Raggi; Maria J Perugorria; Eugenio Gaudio; Kirsten M Boberg; Jose J G Marin; Domenico Alvaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Autocrine and Paracrine Mechanisms Promoting Chemoresistance in Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cadamuro; Simone Brivio; Carlo Spirli; Ruth E Joplin; Mario Strazzabosco; Luca Fabris
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  A Pilot Trial of Molecularly Tailored Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Anteneh A Tesfaye; Hongkun Wang; Marion L Hartley; Aiwu Ruth He; Louis Weiner; Nina Gabelia; Lana Kapanadze; Muhammad Shezad; Jonathan R Brody; John L Marshall; Michael J Pishvaian
Journal:  J Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2019-05-02

Review 8.  Current and New Biomarkers for Early Detection, Prognostic Stratification, and Management of Gallbladder Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Patricia García; Angela Lamarca; Javier Díaz; Enrique Carrera; Juan Carlos Roa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Meta-analysis showing that ERCC1 polymorphism is predictive of osteosarcoma prognosis.

Authors:  Xueyong Liu; Zhan Zhang; Chunbo Deng; Yihao Tian; Xun Ma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-19

Review 10.  Overview of current targeted therapy in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoling Song; Yunping Hu; Yongsheng Li; Rong Shao; Fatao Liu; Yingbin Liu
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.