Literature DB >> 21298053

The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Scotland: inferences from hospital admissions.

Adam E Handel1, Lynne Jarvis, Ryan McLaughlin, Anastasia Fries, George C Ebers, Sreeram V Ramagopalan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder with a highly characteristic disease distribution. Prevalence and incidence in general increase with increasing distance from the equator. Similarly the female to male sex ratio increases with increasing latitude. Multiple possible risk factors have been hypothesised for this epidemiological trend, including human leukocyte antigen allele frequencies, ultraviolet exposure and subsequent vitamin D levels, smoking and Epstein-Barr virus. In this study we undertook a study of medical records across Scotland on an NHS health board level of resolution to examine the epidemiology of MS in this region. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We calculated the number and rate of patient-linked hospital admissions throughout Scotland between 1997 and 2009 from the Scottish Morbidity Records. We used weighted-regression to examine correlations between these measures of MS, and latitude and smoking prevalence. We found a highly significant relationship between MS patient-linked admissions and latitude (r weighted by standard error (r(sw)) = 0.75, p = 0.002). There was no significant relationship between smoking prevalence and MS patient-linked admissions. DISCUSSION: There is a definite latitudinal effect on MS risk across Scotland, arising primarily from an excess of female MS patients at more Northerly latitudes. Whether this is a true gradient or whether a threshold effect may apply at particular latitude will be revealed only by further research. A number of genetic and environmental factors may underlie this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21298053      PMCID: PMC3029296          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex neurological disorder characterised by demyelination and axonal loss.[1] MS shows a marked variation by latitude throughout the world, with increasing prevalence and incidence with increasing distance from the equator.[2], [3] This latitudinal effect has been observed in a large number of different studies in the Northern hemisphere and also holds true in the Southern hemisphere. Much of this latitude gradient appears to stem from an excess of female MS patients at higher latitudes.[4], [5] Multiple genetic and environmental risk factors have been hypothesised to underlie the distribution of MS, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele frequencies, ultraviolet radiation and vitamin D levels, smoking, and infection with Epstein-Barr virus.[6], [7], [8], [9] It is likely that many of these interact together on a population-wide level to determine MS prevalence and incidence.[8], [10], [11] The Northern parts of Scotland have previously been shown to have a particularly high prevalence of MS.[12] This appears to be responsible for much of the latitudinal variation in MS across the United Kingdom.[13] However recent data on the prevalence of MS in Scotland is not available. Given suggestions that the latitude gradient in MS is decreasing,[5] we undertook an analysis of MS hospital admissions stratified by NHS health board in Scotland in order to examine epidemiological trends in MS in fine detail.

Methods

Data on hospital admissions for MS between 1997 and 2009 were analysed using a file of linked hospital admission statistics, built from the Scottish Morbidity Records (SMR01) system. SMR01 records all inpatient and day case discharges from non-obstetric and non-psychiatric specialties in NHS Hospitals in Scotland. Probability matching methods have been used to link together individual hospital records for each patient, thereby creating “linked” patient histories. Up to six diagnoses (1 principal, 5 secondary) are recorded on SMR01 returns. All six diagnoses have been used to select Multiple Sclerosis. The following code was used from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Other Health Problems, tenth revision (ICD10): Multiple Sclerosis - G35. These diagnoses are made by the lead physician responsible for each patient's care during the admission. We show data for the areas of the 14 Scottish Strategic Health Boards. MS indirect admission rates were calculated using observed average annual numbers of MS patients from each area with one or more hospital admissions as the numerators and the expected number of average annual MS admissions from census data as the denominators, before multiplying this by the overall MS admissions rate for Scotland. Using data linkage, we identified each person only once for MS, regardless of how many admissions each person had, and recorded their residence at first known admission for MS. To adjust for differences in the age structure of different areas, age-standardisation was undertaken using the indirect method and the age-specific rates in the Scottish population. All rates are expressed per 100 000 population with 95% lower and upper confidence limits. Rates were calculated separately for males and females as well as both sexes combined. We also calculated rates for other autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus) and a neurological disease (motor neuron disease). Smoking data was obtained from the Atlas of Tobacco Smoking in Scotland, produced by the NHS Health Scotland, ISD Scotland and ASH Scotland.[14] Population smoking prevalence estimates were used from 2003/2004 and were based upon all age groups combined. Latitudes for each NHS health board were defined as the latitude of the administrative centre for that health board. As anonymised data were used we followed the ethical principles of existing UK data protection legislation and guidance, including two National Statistics (NS) Protocols on Data Access and Confidentiality, and Data Matching and so specific ethical approval was not required for this study. We performed Pearson and linear weighted regression to compare the admissions for MS, latitude and smoking using MATLAB R2009a. Least-squared weighted regression was conducted based both on standard error estimates and a weighting value derived from NHS health board population numbers. χ2 tests were used to compare observed and expected hospital admissions throughout Scottish health boards.

Results

MS admissions by NHS health board

The overall number of patients admitted with MS (as an absolute value over the 13 year period and a yearly average) and indirect rate per 100,000 population are shown in . Overall 11,094 individual patients were admitted with MS in Scotland between 1997 and 2009. This was equivalent to a yearly average of 853 and an indirect rate of 16.87 per 100,000 population. However, it was clear that the admission rates varied considerably between NHS health boards, with the highest rate in NHS Orkney Islands (37.38 [95% CI 25.40–49.37]) and the lowest in NHS Forth Valley (12.54 [95% CI 5.60–19.47]).
Table 1

Overall admissions data for MS in Scotland between 1997 and 2009.

NHS board of residenceObserved patients (13 year total)Expected patients (13 year total)Average yearly observed patientsAverage yearly expected patientsIndirect rate per 100,000Lower 95% CIUpper 95% CI
NHS Ayrshire & Arran949816.2073.0062.7819.6210.9428.30
NHS Borders202246.3215.5418.9513.846.5521.13
NHS Dumfries & Galloway341336.3326.2325.8717.119.0025.22
NHS Fife793769.5561.0059.2017.399.2225.56
NHS Forth Valley455612.4835.0047.1112.545.6019.47
NHS Grampian1,3771,153.98105.9288.7720.1411.3428.93
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde2,1902,567.77168.46197.5214.396.9621.83
NHS Highland900682.0369.2352.4622.2713.0231.52
NHS Lanarkshire1,0511,206.5680.8592.8114.707.1822.21
NHS Lothian1,6111,688.84123.92129.9116.108.2323.96
NHS Orkney Islands9743.787.463.3737.3825.4049.37
NHS Shetland Islands7247.705.543.6725.4715.5835.36
NHS Tayside844851.4664.9265.5016.738.7124.74
NHS Western Isles7359.025.624.5420.8711.9229.83
Scotland 11,094 853 16.87
The data for male and female patients admitted with MS are shown in and . The indirect rate for MS in females across Scotland was significantly higher than in males (males 10.69 vs. females 22.64, χ2 =  4.28, d.f. = 1, p = 0.04).
Table 2

Male only admissions data for MS in Scotland between 1997 and 2009.

NHS board of residenceObserved patients (13 year total)Expected patients (13 year total)Average yearly observed patientsAverage yearly expected patientsIndirect rate per 100,000Lower 95% CIUpper 95% CI
NHS Ayrshire & Arran304248.1223.3819.0913.106.0120.19
NHS Borders5676.824.315.917.792.3213.27
NHS Dumfries & Galloway97104.877.468.079.893.7316.05
NHS Fife244235.5218.7718.1211.084.5517.60
NHS Forth Valley128187.049.8514.397.322.0212.62
NHS Grampian393363.1430.2327.9311.574.9018.24
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde691768.4053.1559.119.623.5415.69
NHS Highland280214.2021.5416.4813.986.6521.30
NHS Lanarkshire314363.6124.1527.979.233.2815.19
NHS Lothian503510.8738.6939.3010.534.1716.89
NHS Orkney Islands2713.932.081.0720.7211.8029.64
NHS Shetland Islands2315.431.771.1915.948.1123.76
NHS Tayside246261.0318.9220.0810.083.8516.30
NHS Western Isles2219.011.691.4612.385.4819.27
Scotland 3,384 260.31 10.69
Table 3

Female only admissions data for MS in Scotland between 1997 and 2009.

NHS board of residenceObserved patients (13 year total)Expected patients (13 year total)Average yearly observed patientsAverage yearly expected patientsIndirect rate per 100,0001 Lower 95% CIUpper 95% CI
NHS Ayrshire & Arran645571.3949.6243.9525.5515.6435.46
NHS Borders146168.9211.2312.9919.5610.9028.23
NHS Dumfries & Galloway244231.0918.7717.7823.9014.3233.48
NHS Fife551534.6042.3841.1223.3313.8632.80
NHS Forth Valley328426.6125.2332.8217.409.2325.58
NHS Grampian984778.8175.6959.9128.6018.1239.08
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde1,5011,812.62115.46139.4318.7410.2627.23
NHS Highland620463.5547.6935.6630.2719.4941.06
NHS Lanarkshire738848.5856.7765.2819.6910.9928.38
NHS Lothian1,1101,180.1985.3890.7821.2912.2530.33
NHS Orkney Islands7029.415.382.2653.8839.4968.27
NHS Shetland Islands4931.323.772.4135.4223.7547.08
NHS Tayside598591.7846.0045.5222.8713.5032.25
NHS Western Isles5139.143.923.0129.5018.8540.14
Scotland 7,718 594 22.64

Correlation of MS admissions with latitude

Overall MS hospital admissions showed a strong correlation with latitude ( ; r = 0.76, p = 0.001; r weighted by SE (rsw) = 0.75, p = 0.002; r weighted by population (rpw) = 0.71, p = 0.004). This held true when analysed separately by gender, although the male data was not significant when weighted by population ( ; males – r = 0.77, p = 0.001; rsw = 0.74, p = 0.002; rpw = 0.52, p = 0.06; females – r = 0.77, p = 0.001; rsw = 0.76, p = 0.002; rpw = 0.76, p = 0.001).
Figure 1

Scatter plots of MS admission rates against latitude.

(A) Overall data. (B) Male (blue) and female (red) specific data.

Scatter plots of MS admission rates against latitude.

(A) Overall data. (B) Male (blue) and female (red) specific data.

Correlation of MS admissions with smoking prevalence

There was a nominally significant inverse correlation with smoking but this was lost in the weighted regression ( ; overall – r = −0.55, p = 0.04, rsw = −0.49, p = 0.08; rpw = −0.25, p = 0.39; ; males – r = −0.52, p = 0.06, rsw = −0.47, p = 0.09; rpw = −0.21, p = 0.47; females – r = −0.56, p = 0.04; rsw = −0.49, p = 0.08; rpw = −0.25, p = 0.38).
Figure 2

Scatter plots of MS admission rates against smoking prevalence.

(A) Overall data. (B) Male (blue) and female (red) specific data.

Scatter plots of MS admission rates against smoking prevalence.

(A) Overall data. (B) Male (blue) and female (red) specific data.

Sex ratio

There was no significant correlation between the sex ratio and latitude in MS patient-linked admissions except when weighted by population ( ; r = 0.32, p = 0.27; rsw = 0.41, p = 0.15, rpw = 0.75, p = 0.002). There was no relationship between the sex ratio and smoking prevalence (r = 0.27, p = 0.36; rsw = 0.36, p = 0.21; rpw = 0.14, p = 0.64).
Figure 3

Scatter plots of female-to-male sex-ratio of MS admission rates against latitude.

Other autoimmune and neurological diseases

There was no significant overall correlation between indirect admissions rate and latitude for several autoimmune diseases (data not shown; rheumatoid arthritis – rsw = 0.29, p = 0.39; Crohn's disease – rsw = 0.06, p = 0.81; type 1 diabetes mellitus – rsw = 0.26, p = 0.37) or a neurological disease (motor neuron disease – rsw = 0.26, p = 0.37). Indirect admissions rates for ulcerative colitis did show a nominally significant correlation with latitude (rsw = 0.57, p = 0.03) but this was lost after correction for multiple hypothesis testing.

Discussion

We present here the most up to date available map of the distribution of MS in Scotland. Our findings have shown that the latitude gradient of MS prevalence and incidence observed still exists in Scotland.[2] As suggested by previous work,[2] much of this latitude gradient is as a result of an increase in female MS risk at increasing latitudes. It must be noted, however, that, although our data does support a latitudinal gradient, the data itself could also argue for a “threshold” effect around 57°N. Until more is understood about the aetiological origin for this effect of latitude on MS prevalence, conclusions regarding this must remain tentative. Smoking does not appear to underlie this latitudinal effect, especially given the apparent inverse correlation of smoking prevalence with latitude. Although there is some suggestion that the sex-ratio in MS admissions may be inversely related to smoking prevalence, this is quite unlikely to be a real effect given that where MS risk is highest (NHS Orkney Islands), smoking prevalence is lowest and so, regardless of the ratio between male and female smoking behaviour, it is difficult to envision how the absence of a susceptibility factor could result in a sex-specific increase of disease risk.[15] There are clear limitations in using background population measures of smoking prevalence as a surrogate for exposure in patients with MS. In particular, effects on the level of individual patients will not be detected in this sort of population-based data. Future studies should re-examine this question in relation to MS-specific smoking data. Limitations of record linkage studies using routinely collected administrative data are well known, and include the facts that the data are limited to hospitalised patients and that information about some variables of potential interest, such as social circumstances and ethnicity, are generally unavailable. It is also worth noting that the sample size of regions primarily driving the latitudinal effect (e.g. the Orkney and Shetland Islands) and relatively small and so this effect will need to be confirmed in future work. The fact that latitudinal effects were not seen for other autoimmune and neurological diseases argues strongly against the gradient we observed being solely due to underlying trends in hospital services or background population admissions rates. The environmental risk factor that most likely explains the latitudinal effect observed in this study is the effect of ultraviolet irradiation on vitamin D biosynthesis. Vitamin D deficiency has already been associated with risk of MS and controls the expression of HLA-DRB1*1501, the key genetic risk factor in MS.[10], [16] However, it is likely that MS prevalence will be explained only by considering a complex interplay of genetic and environmental risk factors, some of which may not yet have been identified [8]. The latitudinal variation in MS prevalence may have important implications for neurological service provision. For example, although the number of MS-relevant clinics per week correlates well with the total number of admissions as one would expect with the tendency of admissions to follow hospital resources (r = 0.69, p<0.01), these show a trend towards inverse correlation with MS indirect admissions rates, probably a better estimate of background disease prevalence (r = −0.52, p = 0.06) [17]. MS disease distribution should be considered when evaluating neurology services in Scotland in the future. In conclusion, the distribution of MS across Scotland shows nearly three-fold variation, at least as measured by hospitalisation rates. The higher rates in the North than South of Scotland persist; they are consistent with earlier findings from studies in different parts of the UK; and they are consistent with the more general finding across the world that MS prevalence increases with increasing distance from the equator in both hemispheres. The high prevalence of MS in the North of Scotland should be recognised in funding of care for MS and for studies of disease prevention.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J H Noseworthy; C Lucchinetti; M Rodriguez; B G Weinshenker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part I: the role of infection.

Authors:  Alberto Ascherio; Kassandra L Munger
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 3.  Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part II: Noninfectious factors.

Authors:  Alberto Ascherio; Kassandra L Munger
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Kassandra L Munger; Lynn I Levin; Bruce W Hollis; Noel S Howard; Alberto Ascherio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Explaining multiple sclerosis prevalence by ultraviolet exposure: a geospatial analysis.

Authors:  B D Beretich; T M Beretich
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Surveying multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  N Robertson; A Compston
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Low maternal exposure to ultraviolet radiation in pregnancy, month of birth, and risk of multiple sclerosis in offspring: longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Judith Staples; Anne-Louise Ponsonby; Lynette Lim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-29

8.  The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the Outer Hebrides compared with north-east Scotland and the Orkney and Shetland Islands.

Authors:  G Dean; J Goodall; A Downie
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Temporal trends in the incidence of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alvaro Alonso; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Expression of the multiple sclerosis-associated MHC class II Allele HLA-DRB1*1501 is regulated by vitamin D.

Authors:  Sreeram V Ramagopalan; Narelle J Maugeri; Lahiru Handunnetthi; Matthew R Lincoln; Sarah-Michelle Orton; David A Dyment; Gabriele C Deluca; Blanca M Herrera; Michael J Chao; A Dessa Sadovnick; George C Ebers; Julian C Knight
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  13 in total

1.  A potent and selective C-11 labeled PET tracer for imaging sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 in the CNS demonstrates sexually dimorphic expression.

Authors:  Xuyi Yue; Hongjun Jin; Hui Liu; Adam J Rosenberg; Robyn S Klein; Zhude Tu
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  Multiple sclerosis in the Republic of San Marino, Italian peninsula: an incidence and prevalence study from a high-risk area.

Authors:  Marta Caniglia-Tenaglia; Susanna Guttmann; Chiara Monaldini; Dario Manzaroli; Mirco Volpini; Maurizio Stumpo; Elisabetta Groppo; Ilaria Casetta; Vittorio Govoni; Mattia Fonderico; Maura Pugliatti; Enrico Granieri
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  FutureMS cohort profile: a Scottish multicentre inception cohort study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Patrick K A Kearns; Sarah J Martin; Jessie Chang; Rozanna Meijboom; Elizabeth N York; Yingdi Chen; Christine Weaver; Amy Stenson; Katarzyna Hafezi; Stacey Thomson; Elizabeth Freyer; Lee Murphy; Adil Harroud; Peter Foley; David Hunt; Margaret McLeod; Jonathon O'Riordan; F J Carod-Artal; Niall J J MacDougall; Sergio E Baranzini; Adam D Waldman; Peter Connick; Siddharthan Chandran
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Enhanced sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 expression underlies female CNS autoimmunity susceptibility.

Authors:  Lillian Cruz-Orengo; Brian P Daniels; Denise Dorsey; Sarah Alison Basak; José G Grajales-Reyes; Erin E McCandless; Laura Piccio; Robert E Schmidt; Anne H Cross; Seth D Crosby; Robyn S Klein
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Solar radiation and vitamin D: mitigating environmental factors in autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Gerry K Schwalfenberg
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-01-11

6.  Epigallocatechin-3-gallate: a useful, effective and safe clinical approach for targeted prevention and individualised treatment of neurological diseases?

Authors:  Anja Mähler; Silvia Mandel; Mario Lorenz; Urs Ruegg; Erich E Wanker; Michael Boschmann; Friedemann Paul
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Is it time to revise the classification of geographical distribution of multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Hossein Pakdaman; Ali Amini Harandi
Journal:  Iran J Neurol       Date:  2012

Review 8.  What went wrong? The flawed concept of cerebrospinal venous insufficiency.

Authors:  José M Valdueza; Florian Doepp; Stephan J Schreiber; Bob W van Oosten; Klaus Schmierer; Friedemann Paul; Mike P Wattjes
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Individual, environmental, and meteorological predictors of daily personal ultraviolet radiation exposure measurements in a United States cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Khaykin Cahoon; David C Wheeler; Michael G Kimlin; Richard K Kwok; Bruce H Alexander; Mark P Little; Martha S Linet; Daryl Michal Freedman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can we prevent or treat multiple sclerosis by individualised vitamin D supply?

Authors:  Jan Dörr; Andrea Döring; Friedemann Paul
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.