| Literature DB >> 21297985 |
Laurence Mangin1, Guy Lesèche, Alain Duprey, Christine Clerici.
Abstract
Ventilatory chaos is strongly linked to the activity of central pattern generators, alone or influenced by respiratory or cardiovascular afferents. We hypothesized that carotid atherosclerosis should alter ventilatory chaos through baroreflex and autonomic nervous system dysfunctions. Chaotic dynamics of inspiratory flow was prospectively evaluated in 75 subjects undergoing carotid ultrasonography: 27 with severe carotid stenosis (>70%), 23 with moderate stenosis (<70%), and 25 controls. Chaos was characterized by the noise titration method, the correlation dimension and the largest Lyapunov exponent. Baroreflex sensitivity was estimated in the frequency domain. In the control group, 92% of the time series exhibit nonlinear deterministic chaos with positive noise limit, whereas only 68% had a positive noise limit value in the stenoses groups. Ventilatory chaos was impaired in the groups with carotid stenoses, with significant parallel decrease in the noise limit value, correlation dimension and largest Lyapunov exponent, as compared to controls. In multiple regression models, the percentage of carotid stenosis was the best in predicting the correlation dimension (p<0.001, adjusted R(2): 0.35) and largest Lyapunov exponent (p<0.001, adjusted R(2): 0.6). Baroreflex sensitivity also predicted the correlation dimension values (p = 0.05), and the LLE (p = 0.08). Plaque removal after carotid surgery reversed the loss of ventilatory complexity. To conclude, ventilatory chaos is impaired in carotid atherosclerosis. These findings depend on the severity of the stenosis, its localization, plaque surface and morphology features, and is independently associated with baroreflex sensitivity reduction. These findings should help to understand the determinants of ventilatory complexity and breathing control in pathological conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21297985 PMCID: PMC3030574 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics and lung function of the subjects.
| Control group | Moderate stenosis | Severe stenosis | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Age (yr) | 62±12 | 68±8 | 69±9 |
| Gender (M/F) | 13/12 | 17/6 | 20/7 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26±4 | 26±3 | 25±3 |
| Current Smokers | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Diabetes | 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Hypertension | 14 | 13 | 21 |
| Transient ischemic attack | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Carotid stenosis (%) | 0 | 39±12 | 72±22 |
|
| |||
| FEV1 (%predicted) | 96±14 | 90±18 | 85±13 |
| FEV1/FVC (%predicted) | 100±17 | 101±6 | 104±10 |
| FEF 75 (%predicted) | 106±23 | 102±30 | 92±24 |
| Oxygen Saturation (%) | 98±1 | 98±2 | 97±2 |
Values are mean±SD; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in the first second, FEV1/FVC: forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity, FEF75: 75% of the forced expiratory flow;
*p<0.5,
***p<0.001, Control group versus Severe stenosis;
p<0.001, Moderate stenosis versus Severe stenosis; Anova1 or χ2 tests when appropriate.
Linear measures, coefficients of variation and autocorrelation coefficient, of breath variables among the three groups.
| Control group | Moderate Stenosis | Severe Stenosis | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Inspiratory time (s) | 0.11±0.04 | 0.15±0.06 | 0.17±0.06 |
| Expiratory time | 0.13±0.03 | 0.15±0.05 | 0.18±0.05 |
| Total Cycle time | 0.10±0.04 | 0.13±0.04 | 0.15±0.04 |
| Tidal Volume (l) | 0.14±0.07 | 0.16±0.07 | 0.21±0.10 |
| Total duty cycle | 0.08±0.03 | 0.10±0.04 | 0.11±0.03 |
| Inspiratory flow (l/s) | 0.13±0.04 | 0.14±0.06 | 0.16±0.11 |
|
| |||
| Inspiratory flow | 0.7±0.22 | 0.83±0.12 | 0.77±0.21 |
Values are mean±SD;
***p<0.001,
**p<0.01,
*p<0.05 Control group versus Severe stenosis;
p<0.05,
p<0.001 Control versus Moderate stenosis,
p<0.001, Moderate versus Severe stenosis. Covariance analysis controlling for age.
Correlation coefficients between carotid stenosis and linear/nonlinear measures of breath variations and baroreflex sensitivity.
| Carotid stenoses | p value | |
| (%) | ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Inspiratory time | 0.4 | p<0.001 |
| Expiratory time | 0.4 | p<0.001 |
| Total cycle time | 0.4 | p<0.001 |
| Inspiratory flow | 0.3 | p = 0.02 |
|
| ||
| Inspiratory flow | 0.2 | p = 0.07 |
|
| ||
| Noise limit | −0.35 | p<0.01 |
| Correlation Dimension | −0.6 | p<0.001 |
| Largest Lyapunov exponent | −0.7 | p<0.001 |
|
| −0.3 | p = 0.02 |
Partial correlation coefficient are given controlling for age.
Figure 1Chaos characterization of inspiratory flow in the control group, in the groups with moderate and severe carotid stenosis.
Noise Limit value (%) in the top, Correlation dimension in the middle and largest Lyapunov exponent in the bottom. The boxes encompass the interquartile range with indication of the median, the whiskers delimit the 95th percentile of the data distribution (ANOVA).
Figure 2Three dimensional colored parametric surface showing the largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE) (z- axis) as a function of the autocorrelation coefficient (AC) (y-axis) and the coefficient of variation (CV) (x-axis) of inspiratory flow (Vt/Ti) in all subjects of the control group (A), moderate carotid stenosis group (B) and severe carotid stenosis group (C).
Color is proportional to the surface height (the value of the LLE). For clarity, the scale of the y-axis (AC) of the middle panel (B) has been narrowed whereas the scale of the x-axis (CV Vt/Ti) of the bottom panel (C) has been enlarged. See text for comments.
Figure 3Coefficient of variation, autocorrelation coefficient (one breath lag) (top) and chaotic analysis (correlation dimension and largest Lyapunov exponent) (bottom) of the inspiratory flow before and 72 hours after carotid endarterectomy.