Leo Pang1, Jean-Pierre Jeannon, Ricard Simo. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The term salvage surgery denotes oncological surgery after failed radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Salvage surgery is a high-risk endeavour as it carries a significant risk of complications. The purpose of this review is to assess the ways in which complications from salvage surgery can be prevented and minimized. This is a complex subject and complications are often multifactorial and interrelated. There are many aspects that can be discussed; however, to address each of them individually would be impossible and beyond the scope of this article. We will, therefore, focus this review on the most relevant aspects to current practice for head and neck surgeons. RECENT FINDINGS: Salvage surgery after failure of radiotherapy and CRT remains controversial and many aspects still lack evidence. Many patients with recurrent cancer are not suitable for salvage surgery due to severe co-morbidities or disease progression. Salvage surgery is best carried out in tertiary centres by experienced multidisciplinary teams. Preoperative assessment and evaluation is critical to success and to minimize complications. Surgical principles include single incisions, delicate tissue handling, use of frozen sections, adopting a critical approach to neck dissections and the use of flaps, secondary surgical voice restoration for laryngectomies and appropriate postoperative care. SUMMARY: This review emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach by experienced teams, the centralization of resources and teams, a structured and thorough patient assessment, surgical planning and a systematic attention to detail when addressing patients undergoing salvage surgery.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The term salvage surgery denotes oncological surgery after failed radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Salvage surgery is a high-risk endeavour as it carries a significant risk of complications. The purpose of this review is to assess the ways in which complications from salvage surgery can be prevented and minimized. This is a complex subject and complications are often multifactorial and interrelated. There are many aspects that can be discussed; however, to address each of them individually would be impossible and beyond the scope of this article. We will, therefore, focus this review on the most relevant aspects to current practice for head and neck surgeons. RECENT FINDINGS: Salvage surgery after failure of radiotherapy and CRT remains controversial and many aspects still lack evidence. Many patients with recurrent cancer are not suitable for salvage surgery due to severe co-morbidities or disease progression. Salvage surgery is best carried out in tertiary centres by experienced multidisciplinary teams. Preoperative assessment and evaluation is critical to success and to minimize complications. Surgical principles include single incisions, delicate tissue handling, use of frozen sections, adopting a critical approach to neck dissections and the use of flaps, secondary surgical voice restoration for laryngectomies and appropriate postoperative care. SUMMARY: This review emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach by experienced teams, the centralization of resources and teams, a structured and thorough patient assessment, surgical planning and a systematic attention to detail when addressing patients undergoing salvage surgery.
Authors: William Scotton; Richard Cobb; Leo Pang; Iain Nixon; Anil Joshi; Jeanne-Pierre Jeannon; Richard Oakley; Gary French; Carolyn Hemsley; Ricard Simo Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Magis Mandapathil; Marion Roessler; Jochen A Werner; Carl E Silver; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Carol M Lewis; Thomas A Aloia; Weiming Shi; Ira Martin; Stephen Y Lai; Jesse C Selber; Amy C Hessel; Matthew M Hanasono; Katherine A Hutcheson; Geoffrey L Robb; Randal S Weber Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: William J Scotton; I J Nixon; T F Pezier; R Cobb; A Joshi; T Guerrero Urbano; R Oakley; J P Jeannon; R S Simo Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Kaitlin M Christopherson; Amy C Moreno; Baher Elgohari; Neil Gross; Renata Ferrarotto; Abdallah Sherif Radwan Mohamed; G Brandon Gunn; Ryan P Goepfert; Frank E Mott; Shalin J Shah; C David Fuller; Jay P Reddy; Steven J Frank; William H Morrison; Jack Phan; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 5.972
Authors: Cesare Piazza; Alberto Paderno; Elisabeth V Sjogren; Patrick J Bradley; Hans E Eckel; Antti Mäkitie; Nayla Matar; Vinidh Paleri; Giorgio Peretti; Roberto Puxeddu; Miquel Quer; Marc Remacle; Vincent Vander Poorten; Isabel Vilaseca; Ricard Simo Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 2.503