Literature DB >> 21297152

Respiratory health and lung function in Chinese restaurant kitchen workers.

Tze Wai Wong1, Andromeda H S Wong, Frank S C Lee, Hong Qiu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure air pollutant concentrations in Chinese restaurant kitchens using different stove types and assess their influence on workers' respiratory health.
METHODS: 393 kitchen workers from 53 Chinese restaurants were surveyed over 16 months: 115 workers from 21 restaurants using only electric stoves and 278 workers from 32 restaurants using only gas stoves. Workers were interviewed about their respiratory symptoms and had their lung function tested. Concentrations of nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO(2)), methane (CH(4)), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) and fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) were measured using portable monitors and air-bag sampling. Temperature and noise levels were assessed.
RESULTS: Median concentrations of NO, NO(2) and CO were 7.4, 1.5 and 1.6 times higher in gas-fuelled kitchens than in electric ones and average concentrations of PM(2.5) and TVOC were 81% and 78% higher, respectively. Differences were smaller for CH(4) and NMHC. Electricity-run kitchens were 4.5°C cooler and 9 dBA less noisy than gas-fuelled ones. Workers using electric cookers had significantly better lung function than their gas-using counterparts and their mean FEV(1) and FVC values were 5.4% and 3.8% higher, respectively, after adjustment for confounders. Wheeze, phlegm, cough and sore throat were more prevalent in workers using gas. The adjusted OR for having phlegm regularly was significantly higher.
CONCLUSIONS: The poorer lung function and higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms among workers in gas-fuelled kitchens compared to those in electricity-powered kitchens may be associated with exposure to higher concentrations of toxic air pollutants generated during gas cooking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21297152     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2010.059378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  7 in total

1.  Work environment factors and respiratory complaints in Norwegian cooks.

Authors:  Sindre Rabben Svedahl; Bjørn Hilt; Kristin Svendsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Environmental and non-infectious factors in the aetiology of pharyngitis (sore throat).

Authors:  Bertold Renner; Christian A Mueller; Adrian Shephard
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 4.575

3.  Cooking smoke and respiratory symptoms of restaurant workers in Thailand.

Authors:  Chudchawal Juntarawijit; Yuwayong Juntarawijit
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.317

4.  Effect of Particulate Matter Exposure on Respiratory Health of e-Waste Workers at Agbogbloshie, Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Afua Asabea Amoabeng Nti; John Arko-Mensah; Paul K Botwe; Duah Dwomoh; Lawrencia Kwarteng; Sylvia Akpene Takyi; Augustine Appah Acquah; Prudence Tettey; Niladri Basu; Stuart Batterman; Thomas G Robins; Julius N Fobil
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Peak expiratory flow rate and chronic respiratory symptoms among restaurant workers: a cross-sectional study from Thailand.

Authors:  Chudchawal Juntarawijit
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-08-14

6.  Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the chemical composition and sources of urban PM2.5.

Authors:  Cheol-Heon Jeong; Meguel Yousif; Greg J Evans
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and pulmonary function: a cross-sectional study among non-smoking employees of bar and restaurants in Santiago, Chile.

Authors:  Javiera Parro; Paulina Aceituno; Andrea Droppelmann; Sthepanie Mesías; Claudio Muñoz; Nella Marchetti; Verónica Iglesias
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.