PURPOSE: To characterize optic nerve and retinal changes in a patient with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) with an implanted active epiretinal array. METHODS: A 74-year-old man with end-stage X-linked RP underwent implantation of an epiretinal array over the macula in the right eye and subsequent stimulation until his death at 5 years and 3 months after implantation. The optic nerves from this study patient, as well as those from two age-matched normal patients and two age-matched RP patients, were morphometrically analyzed against two different sets of criteria and compared. The retina underlying the array in the study patient was also morphometrically analyzed and compared with corresponding regions of the retina in the age-matched RP patients. RESULTS: Optic nerve total axon counts were significantly lower in the study patient and RP patients than in normal patients. However, there was no significant difference when comparing total axon counts from the optic nerve corresponding to the patient's implanted right eye versus the optic nerves from the RP patients (P = 0.59 and P = 0.61 using the two different criteria). Degenerated axon data quantified damage and did not show increased damage in the optic nerve quadrant that retinotopically corresponded to the site of epiretinal array implantation and stimulation. Except for the tack site, there was no significant difference when comparing the retina underlying the array and the corresponding perimacular regions of two RP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term implantation and electrical stimulation with an epiretinal array did not result in damage that could be appreciated in a morphometric analysis of the optic nerve and retina.
PURPOSE: To characterize optic nerve and retinal changes in a patient with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP) with an implanted active epiretinal array. METHODS: A 74-year-old man with end-stage X-linked RP underwent implantation of an epiretinal array over the macula in the right eye and subsequent stimulation until his death at 5 years and 3 months after implantation. The optic nerves from this study patient, as well as those from two age-matched normal patients and two age-matched RP patients, were morphometrically analyzed against two different sets of criteria and compared. The retina underlying the array in the study patient was also morphometrically analyzed and compared with corresponding regions of the retina in the age-matched RP patients. RESULTS: Optic nerve total axon counts were significantly lower in the study patient and RP patients than in normal patients. However, there was no significant difference when comparing total axon counts from the optic nerve corresponding to the patient's implanted right eye versus the optic nerves from the RP patients (P = 0.59 and P = 0.61 using the two different criteria). Degenerated axon data quantified damage and did not show increased damage in the optic nerve quadrant that retinotopically corresponded to the site of epiretinal array implantation and stimulation. Except for the tack site, there was no significant difference when comparing the retina underlying the array and the corresponding perimacular regions of two RP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term implantation and electrical stimulation with an epiretinal array did not result in damage that could be appreciated in a morphometric analysis of the optic nerve and retina.
Authors: Jeffrey L Goldberg; Juan S Espinosa; Youfeng Xu; Norman Davidson; Gregory T A Kovacs; Ben A Barres Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-02-28 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland; Gildo Y Fujii; Robert Greenberg; Richard Williamson; Jim Little; Brian Mech; Valerie Cimmarusti; Gretchen Van Boemel; Gislin Dagnelie; Eugene de Juan Journal: Vision Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Eyal Margalit; Mauricio Maia; James D Weiland; Robert J Greenberg; Gildo Y Fujii; Gustavo Torres; Duke V Piyathaisere; Thomas M O'Hearn; Wentai Liu; Gianluca Lazzi; Gislin Dagnelie; Dean A Scribner; Eugene de Juan; Mark S Humayun Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Ilkay Kilic Muftuoglu; Hema L Ramkumar; Dirk-Uwe Bartsch; Amit Meshi; Raouf Gaber; William R Freeman Journal: Retina Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Tai-Chi Lin; Lei-Chi Wang; Lan Yue; Yi Zhang; Paulo Falabella; Danhong Zhu; David R Hinton; Narsing A Rao; David G Birch; Rand Spencer; Jessy D Dorn; Mark S Humayun Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Diego García-Ayuso; Manuel Salinas-Navarro; Marta Agudo-Barriuso; Luis Alarcón-Martínez; Manuel Vidal-Sanz; María P Villegas-Pérez Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2011-06-25 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Diego García-Ayuso; Manuel Salinas-Navarro; Francisco Manuel Nadal-Nicolás; Arturo Ortín-Martínez; Marta Agudo-Barriuso; Manuel Vidal-Sanz; María P Villegas-Pérez Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Diego García-Ayuso; Johnny Di Pierdomenico; Manuel Vidal-Sanz; María P Villegas-Pérez Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 5.923