Literature DB >> 21296780

Candesartan versus imidapril in hypertension: a randomised study to assess effects of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies.

Fen Wei1, Xiu-Jie Jia, Su-Qin Yu, Ye Gu, Li Wang, Xiao-Mei Guo, Min Wang, Feng Zhu, Xiang Cheng, Yu-Miao Wei, Zi-Hua Zhou, Micheal Fu, Yu-Hua Liao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 (AT1 receptor) autoantibodies have previously been shown in sera of hypertensive patients. This study assessed whether anti-AT1-receptor autoantibody in serum is correlated with the efficacy of an AT1-receptor blocker (ARB; candesartan)-based regimen in hypertensive patients after 8 weeks of treatment.
DESIGN: The Study of Optimal Treatment in Hypertensive Patients with Anti-AT1-Receptor Autoantibodies is a multicentre, randomised, blinded endpoint, open-label, parallel-group comparison clinical trial conducted in five centres in Wuhan, China. Treatment is designed as stepwise added-on therapy to reduce blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mm Hg. 512 patients with moderate to severe primary hypertension were randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment with either ARB (candesartan)-based regimen (n=257) or ACE inhibitor (imidapril)-based regimen (n=255).
RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic BP was reduced significantly in both treatment groups. The candesartan-based regimen achieved a significantly greater systolic BP reduction than imdapril (30.8 ± 10.3 vs 28.8 ± 10.3 mm Hg, p = 0.023). In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-positive hypertensive patients, the mean systolic BP at baseline was higher than in the anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative group (160.5 ± 16.5 vs 156.2 ± 17.7 mm Hg; p = 0.006). The mean BP reduction was greater in the candesartan-based regimen than the imidapril-based regimen (-35.4 ± 9.8/16.9 ± 6.9 vs -29.4 ± 9.8/14.2 ± 6.9 mm Hg; p = 0.000 and 0.002, respectively), and more patients on imidapril required add-on medications to achieve BP control (94% vs 86%; p=0.03). No correlation was observed between the titre of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody and the efficacy of candesartan-based therapy. In those anti-AT1 receptor autoantibody-negative patients similar BP lowering was reached in the candesartan and the imidapril-based regimens.
CONCLUSIONS: An ARB-based regimen is more effective in BP lowering than an ACE inhibitor-based regimen in the presence of anti-AT1 receptor autoantibodies. Trial registration number This trial has been registered at http://www.register.clinicaltrials.gov/ (identifier: NCT00360763).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296780     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2009.192104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  21 in total

1.  Hypertension: AT1 autoantibodies and response to therapy.

Authors:  Alexandra King
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  The immunological basis of hypertension.

Authors:  Bernardo Rodríguez-Iturbe; Héctor Pons; Yasmir Quiroz; Richard J Johnson
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibody (AT1-AA)-mediated pregnancy hypertension.

Authors:  Florian Herse; Babbette LaMarca
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Structure-Function Basis of Attenuated Inverse Agonism of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers for Active-State Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor.

Authors:  Takanobu Takezako; Hamiyet Unal; Sadashiva S Karnik; Koichi Node
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 5.  The bidirectional interaction between the sympathetic nervous system and immune mechanisms in the pathogenesis of hypertension.

Authors:  Revathy Carnagarin; Vance Matthews; Maria T K Zaldivia; Karlheinz Peter; Markus P Schlaich
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Assessment and management of hypertension in transplant patients.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Ellen D Burgess; James E Cooper; Andrew Z Fenves; David Goldsmith; Dianne McKay; Anita Mehrotra; Mark M Mitsnefes; Domenic A Sica; Sandra J Taler
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 7.  Receptor-activating autoantibodies and disease: preeclampsia and beyond.

Authors:  Yang Xia; Rodney E Kellems
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 8.  Current topics in angiotensin II type 1 receptor research: Focus on inverse agonism, receptor dimerization and biased agonism.

Authors:  Takanobu Takezako; Hamiyet Unal; Sadashiva S Karnik; Koichi Node
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 7.658

Review 9.  Role of the Immune System in Hypertension.

Authors:  Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe; Hector Pons; Richard J Johnson
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 10.  Hypertension after kidney transplantation: a pathophysiologic approach.

Authors:  Beje Thomas; David J Taber; Titte R Srinivas
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.